Jump to content


Hilesden securities court papers received ** Discontinued ***


john
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4484 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 323
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Would they need proof that I received them or just that they sent them? I'm worried now in case they sent them and she didn't give them to me, or they got binned or something. I'm really bad with correspondence but I think I'd have noticed if i'd opened a default letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they only need to prove the automated system generated them.

 

they dont have to hold the originals nor prove they were actually posted.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sri, i might have confused you here

 

i'm talking about a default notice only

 

the court papers etc are another thing you must have gotten them, if not good reason to set aside.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if I'm being dense but I'm really confused now. postggj said that my defense is I have no default or letter before action, and would request strict proof they were sent, but you say they only need to prove they generated the letter, not that they sent it? I do not understand, sorry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'll bow to post if this is correct

 

knows far more than me.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would this have been sent recorded delivery? What would I do if they say they have sent it but I havent recieved it? if this is my only defense couldnt they put a screen shot of anything on my account? I am now worried that I will also have to pay their court costs.

 

From reading other posts on here I also think that this debt is probably statute barred. Can I ask for any proof from them that I have contacted them in the last 6 years? Also would this still put a default on my file?

Edited by john
Link to post
Share on other sites

oh SB'ed as well

looking better!

 

post bobbydog needs help for hearing tomorrow BTW

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi johm

 

i know you are worried and confused but this has to be done in a tried and tested way

 

all this info can be requested later under the civil proceedure rules

 

remember on that embarrassed defence i did

 

it stated we ask the court to ammend our defence if and when hillesden reply

 

i realise it is hard but you are trying to run before you can walk

 

lets see what hillesdens reply is first to the embarrassed defence

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, yes i did read that in the defence. So i assume that means if they do produce the default and lba, then the next step would be the original cc agreement?. I am sorry to be so vague about my correspondence, I have buried my head in the sand for a long time.

 

As you can see i have spent hours pouring over threads related to this. i think its a case of information overload!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know I'm sorry, I just panic when I think I've done something wrong, especially regarding courts. I imagine myself needing a cake with a file in it!!! I will try to chill more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Acknowledge ASAP send the Claimant a CPR 31.16 in the absence of no detailed P.O.C(you can send a CPR 31.14 if and after they amend the P.o.C) request pertaining to the Claim and Defend all.

 

Hi Postggj I was just reading through my thread and noticed the above paragraph, and have not "sent the claimant a CPR 31.16". Was this in the defence or should I have done this, and if so, what is it,please? Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been looking online to find out how long H S have to respond to my defence, and it says that when the court recieves my defence it sends both parties an allocation questionaire. Is this what will happen next please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...