Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

M&S Chargecard/credit card PLEASE HELP *** SUCCESS ***


emmtay
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4370 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Ok, here's their reply...

 

Thank you for your email dated 11 June. I'm sorry that you remain unhappy with my reply. However, I trust my email will now answer any outstanding questions you have regarding the Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) refund.

 

As we only hold account information for up to six years we have used an average balance to calculate the PPI premium from account opening up to August 2003. From August 2003 up to when the PPI policy was cancelled, we have used the account statements to calculate the contractual interest. The rolling contractual interest is shown in the calculator tab under "Rolling interest balance".

 

To compensate you for the loss of the PPI premiums from the inception of the policy 8% interest has been calculated on each premium at a simple rate. This calculation can be found on the same page under "Additional Interest".

 

M&S Money firmly believes that the calculation is in line with the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) redress guidance.

 

I have again attached a copy of the calculation for your records. The password to open this document is ********** (case sensitive).

 

I have again reviewed the amount of compensation for the delay in providing you with the requested information. As your specific questions hadn't been satisfactorily addressed I've increased the compensation by a further £100 to £300.

 

This is our final offer and if you remain unhappy with our calculations, you should refer the matter back to the ombudsman service.

 

Once again, I'm sorry that you felt it necessary to contact me and I trust that I've been able to clarify our position.

 

Kind regards

 

 

Does this sound correct? Any advice greatly appreciated :)

Emmtay

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they have now explained how they arrived at the figures and it sounds like they have provided their workings.

 

In addition they have upped the compo from £100 to £300.

 

Time to consider their offer and see if it is acceptable to you

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect that the FOS will not make them provide any different "evidence" - so unless their calculations are widely different to yours, I would accept :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ims, do you think their workings are correct? Obviously mine were much more, what do you think the chances are of getting what i worked it out to be if I did go to court? Or would I have to go back to FOS first and see what they think?

Thanks

Emmtay

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Citizen B, yes they are VERY different to mine! They are on this thread, please can you also look at their figures and mine, and give me your opinion too? I would really appreciate that,

Thanks

Emmtay

Link to post
Share on other sites

The compund interest sheet that you prepared and posted earlier has a "claim to" date of 29/5/12. Change it to 21/3/06 and let us know what the resultant figures are in the green box at the top.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so the totals of the two are £4,412.82. Pop that figure in the statutory interest spreadsheet with the date of the payment as 21/3/06 and the claim to date as 25/5/12 (which I think is the date they offered to) and you will see the stat interest amount is about £2,191.

 

Add that to the figure of £4,412 and you get £6,603.

 

Now if we look at what they are offering in total which is £6,365 + £300 = £6,665 if you take that as a global offer then you are about there.

 

If you compare their total offer to the one we have now calculated then our margin of error is about 3.5% which for home made spreadsheets compared to the bank's is not a bad result I would think.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Im confused!

Using the stat int sheet recommended on here, I put in those figures, which total 4412.82, with a claim from date of 21/2/1994 and claim to date of 24/5/2012, and it says interest is 6472.46, therefore total 10,885.28! Plus the 300 comp, 11,185.28.

Cheers

Emmtay

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look at the printout they sent you, the last column shows the statutory interest awarded on the month by month basis so it has been accounted for up to 2006.

 

So all that remains is the bit from 2006 to date.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not unless you want to mount a claim whereby you would have to prove mis-selling and claim a higher rate of interest in restitution.

 

It is likely that they would put up a defence and with the value of your claim it would fall outside the small claims court which would leave you exposed to the potential of their costs should you lose.

 

Their offer seems to stack up with the regulatory guidelines.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely as they have admitted they mis-sold the PPI I wouldn't have to prove much? What would it entail, would I need to involve a solicitor? I claimed my bank charges back through MCOL a few years ago but it didn't get to actually going to court stage, so I'm a little nervous about doing it, but £6k is a big difference to the 26K I had oroginally worked out! Also, I feel a bit p***ed off as I have been waiting over 3.5 years for this, so can't help but feel I want every penny I can get from them if you know what I mean!:!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldnt want to risk going to court either :(

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...