Jump to content


Natwest And Payment Loan Protection


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5689 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It's like this...

 

I started a new job in April 1988 which necessitated the purchase of a car - to this end, NatWest loaned me £4,053, including a PLP element of £553.

 

I only recently came to realise that any such insurance must have been 'mis-sold' as - quite apart from NatWest's failure to ensure I was fully aware of what I was signing up for; advise me that there may be cheaper alternatives; etc; etc - I was starting a new job and, therfore, hadn't been in continuous employment for six months and wouldn't have qualified for any pay-outs under the terms of the PLP.

 

The person who sold me the policy was well aware of my reason for having to purchase a car and ought, therefore, to have advised me there was no point in paying for the PLP.

 

PLEASE CAN SOMEONE CONFIRM I'M THINKING ALONG THE RIGHT LINES?!

 

Moreover, is anyone able to confirm that there would have been a clause referring to continuous employment in any PLP sold by NatWest at this time? I assume there would, as it seems to be standard practice in all types of PPI, but am still waiting for a response to my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to confirm this.

 

Thanks in anticipation

Fred_Funk

NatWest: seeking unlawful charges + interest incurred as a result of those charges of £4,292.82 and contractual interest (compounded) of £4,559.41. Court claim issued 16.01.08; acknowledgement of service filled by Cobbetts on 30.01.08

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry, I meant 1998... doh!

 

The first repayment was on Jun 24 1998 and the final one approximately three years later.

NatWest: seeking unlawful charges + interest incurred as a result of those charges of £4,292.82 and contractual interest (compounded) of £4,559.41. Court claim issued 16.01.08; acknowledgement of service filled by Cobbetts on 30.01.08

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank god to a degree. I was thinking 1988 and that you have no chance. To make you absolutely certain, there has never been any clause that the bank have to tell you that there are cheaper alternatives. That is like saying have a current account with NatWest but Halifax pay more, does that make sense?

However, and this is not my strong point on the forums(never really got involved on the PPI side), if the cover meant that you were ineligible to claim then it is missold. I have to make sure that you wait for others who ARE more experience like Hellsonfury, to respond because there maybe other things advised on PPI. I am not an expert on that part of things, ok?

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fingers crossed, some kind soul will be able to point me in the right direction... I'm after a spreadsheet which can deal with mis-sold PPI on a NatWest loan and the interest incurred as a result of this.

 

Futhermore, I'm also looking for compound interest, at the rate charged to me by NatWest, to compensate for their unjust enrichment and would, therefore, like a spreadsheet which can cope with this too.

 

I've spent the last couple of hours searching high and low on here but, alas, to no avail. The only thing I can find are the spreadsheets for current accounts and credit cards in the templates library and, try as I might, I simply can't get 'em to do the job.

 

Please, someone point me in the right direction!

 

As ever, thanks in anticipation

Fred_Funk

Edited by Fred_Funk

NatWest: seeking unlawful charges + interest incurred as a result of those charges of £4,292.82 and contractual interest (compounded) of £4,559.41. Court claim issued 16.01.08; acknowledgement of service filled by Cobbetts on 30.01.08

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks yourbank.

 

Appreciate this isn't your area of expertise but, just wondered, can you confirm that it's usual for NatWest PLP to make pay-outs dependent on something like 'six months continuous employment'.

 

Assuming this is the case then, clearly, I was just about to start a new job when I took out this loan yet wasn't advised that this would render me illegible for any pay-out, thereby making, IMO, the insurance mis-sold.

NatWest: seeking unlawful charges + interest incurred as a result of those charges of £4,292.82 and contractual interest (compounded) of £4,559.41. Court claim issued 16.01.08; acknowledgement of service filled by Cobbetts on 30.01.08

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be wrong here Fred but I'm almost positive that one of the stipulations for PPi is that you have to have been in continous employment (length varies depending on company I think) prior to the PPi application.

"Never annoy a redhead - especially when she's a member of CAG!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

without seeing a copy of the PLP from 1998 I simply cannot say. If it said that then you would have been ineligible for it at that time.

As I said, wait for some other experienced PPI posters who can clarify this.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks deb4tlj but I don't think that's quite what I'm looking for.

 

I just want a spreadsheet which can calculate how much of the loan repayment I made every month was attributable to the mis-sold PPI and can then calculate the compound interest accordingly (as an equitable remedy to NatWest's unjust enrichment).

 

Anyone?!

NatWest: seeking unlawful charges + interest incurred as a result of those charges of £4,292.82 and contractual interest (compounded) of £4,559.41. Court claim issued 16.01.08; acknowledgement of service filled by Cobbetts on 30.01.08

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello fred,

 

this may help you from this site bank templates library.:D

 

6. Interest calculation spreadsheets

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may just be me but, as far as I can see, there isn't a template available there which does compound interest (as Vamp's used to do).

 

:-(

Edited by Fred_Funk

NatWest: seeking unlawful charges + interest incurred as a result of those charges of £4,292.82 and contractual interest (compounded) of £4,559.41. Court claim issued 16.01.08; acknowledgement of service filled by Cobbetts on 30.01.08

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello fred,

 

you could try this as found by bankerrhymeswith ..it is the oft calculator but it is complex should be able to sort your compound interest once you get an idea on how it works.

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/advice_and_resources/resource_base/consumer-regulations/dualcalc/dualcalc/

 

You will need to download it but it looks a cracking calculator and one the banks simply cannot argue with as it is OFT.

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason you are having difficulty is because there is no ready made spreadsheet to do this. You will have to use dualcalc I think. I was going to post a link but it seems the OFT server now wants a usernamd and password.

 

Try yourself later - Google 'dualcalc oft' to find the link. You can download it to your own PC. It is not very obvious how to use it but I think the way to calculate what you want is as follows:

 

Put in the total loan (loan+PPI), monthly repayments and number of repayments. Click 'calculate' and it should come up with the correct APR. All these figures should be on your loan agreement.

 

Repeat the calculation with just the loan, same number of repayments and then do several runs with different monthly repayments until you get the same APR.

 

The difference between the two monthly repayments is then the monthly chareg for PPI+interest

 

If you can't get your head round that (or can't download dualcalc) perhaps you can send me the figures and I'll have ago.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks deb4tlj but I don't think that's quite what I'm looking for.

 

I just want a spreadsheet which can calculate how much of the loan repayment I made every month was attributable to the mis-sold PPI and can then calculate the compound interest accordingly (as an equitable remedy to NatWest's unjust enrichment).

 

Anyone?!

 

You could always have a go at doing your own spreadsheet from scratch - found this great site to help do just that. :-)

 

Excel Spreadsheets for Beginners: Financial Functions

"Never annoy a redhead - especially when she's a member of CAG!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's like this...

 

I started a new job in April 1988 which necessitated the purchase of a car - to this end, NatWest loaned me £4,053, including a PLP element of £553.

 

I only recently came to realise that any such insurance must have been 'mis-sold' as - quite apart from NatWest's failure to ensure I was fully aware of what I was signing up for; advise me that there may be cheaper alternatives; etc; etc - I was starting a new job and, therfore, hadn't been in continuous employment for six months and wouldn't have qualified for any pay-outs under the terms of the PLP.

 

The person who sold me the policy was well aware of my reason for having to purchase a car and ought, therefore, to have advised me there was no point in paying for the PLP.

 

PLEASE CAN SOMEONE CONFIRM I'M THINKING ALONG THE RIGHT LINES?!

 

Moreover, is anyone able to confirm that there would have been a clause referring to continuous employment in any PLP sold by NatWest at this time? I assume there would, as it seems to be standard practice in all types of PPI, but am still waiting for a response to my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to confirm this.

 

Thanks in anticipation

Fred_Funk

 

Hello Fred,

 

See you going for the nastywest:D

 

I was very successful with a loan I took out with them in 2001, but have not been very successful with 3 loans prior to that. They state their databases do not hold any information from that period and I must confess it is like trying to get blood out of a stone, but onwards and upwards, I am happy with the situation as it stands.

 

My case is a little bit more complicated, in the fact they have defaulted me on this loan and are threatening recovery action on the alleged balance, of which their is no credit agreement so the account is in legal dispute and has been for over a year. I have calculated that they owe me over £18,000 in ppi premiums over the 3 previous loans, plus statutory interest:confused: So I am waiting for their next move.

 

Regarding your loan, I fear that they will state they do not hold any information regarding it as they do not have a legal obligation to retain information from 1998. but don't let that put you off. If you know your figures, work out the contractual or statutory interest and send them your prelim, state your reasons for mis=selling and see what they come back with. You can then turn around their arguement with the relevant legislation ie misrepresentation act, will turn the onus on them to prove they did not mis-sell you it.

 

During these years mis-selling was rife, many customers did not even realise they had it on the loan (I didn't know till I found this site and started to investigate) Don't forget this is why the ppi market is under investigation and companies are being heavily fined.:grin:

 

When you send your prelim, you are inviting them into a sincere dialogue, but be ready for them,

  • Haha 1

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have actually done a spreadsheet, which gives a fairly accurate figure and helped me with my sucessfull calim with First Plus.

 

It's not perfect, but my figure was very close to what First Plus refunded (

 

I have sent it to a couple on Mods for review and upload to the site, but no one has come back to me :mad:

------------------------------------------------------------

 

First Direct - Refund of Bank Charges...... **WON** (Offered full amount of £5200 2 days before court)

 

Amex - Refund of charges..... **WON** (£330 refunded without much fight)

 

First Plus PPI - **WON** (Full Refund of over £7000 + Interest)

Norton Finance - Owe me over £6000 for mis-sold PPI - Starting court action in the new year!

Barclaycard PPi - Ongoing (Being complete tos*ers!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that you have to use an iterative solution method to solve the equations - there is no formula to do it

 

?????

 

If you are guessing your figures then yes, but if you do your SAR and get the actual figures from the lender, then it is possible to calculate!

------------------------------------------------------------

 

First Direct - Refund of Bank Charges...... **WON** (Offered full amount of £5200 2 days before court)

 

Amex - Refund of charges..... **WON** (£330 refunded without much fight)

 

First Plus PPI - **WON** (Full Refund of over £7000 + Interest)

Norton Finance - Owe me over £6000 for mis-sold PPI - Starting court action in the new year!

Barclaycard PPi - Ongoing (Being complete tos*ers!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll send it through to you, as I would welcome the feedback. I'm far from an expert on these calculations, but if between us we can create a spreadsheet which other CAG users can use (If relevant to their circumstances)

------------------------------------------------------------

 

First Direct - Refund of Bank Charges...... **WON** (Offered full amount of £5200 2 days before court)

 

Amex - Refund of charges..... **WON** (£330 refunded without much fight)

 

First Plus PPI - **WON** (Full Refund of over £7000 + Interest)

Norton Finance - Owe me over £6000 for mis-sold PPI - Starting court action in the new year!

Barclaycard PPi - Ongoing (Being complete tos*ers!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to everyone who's taken the time to contribute to this thread.

 

I think I've finally managed to get my brain into gear and sort things out - though if someone can confirm my figures sound about right it would be much appreciated.

 

Fortunately, I have my old statements from which I deduced I had a loan for just over 4k - of which £553 was, IMO, mis-sold PPI (or PLP as NatWest prefers to call it) - and made 36 repayments of £140.19.

 

By my reckoning that means I repaid a shade over 5k in total and, according to a loan calculator I found online, the APR was 15.94% or thereabouts.

 

My old statements also detail the breakdown of my 36 monthly repayments - in June 1998, £50.14 of the £140 was interest by May 2001 it was just £1.70 - and using them I've come up with some figures to input on a version of Vamp's compound interest spreadsheet for current accounts.

 

That tells me the £553 I paid for my mis-sold PLP in 1998 with compound interest at NatWest's 15.94% now equates to £2,510.96. In addition, the interest paid on penalties over the three-year term totals £235.79 and the compound interest on this is a further £620.05. This produces a grand total of £3,366.80.

 

So, my question to you guys, do these figures seem feasible?!

 

As ever, thanks in anticipation

Fred_Funk

NatWest: seeking unlawful charges + interest incurred as a result of those charges of £4,292.82 and contractual interest (compounded) of £4,559.41. Court claim issued 16.01.08; acknowledgement of service filled by Cobbetts on 30.01.08

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK I checked - loan of £4053 paid by 36 installments of £140.19 = 15.9% APR

 

£553 at 15.9% over 10 years gives interest of £2418.57 altough the interest you actually paid is over 3 years - £860.95

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Steven

 

Thanks for taking the trouble to have a look at this.

 

Just not quite sure what you're trying to say in your second line... where does the £860.95 figure for interest I actually paid over three years come from?!

 

Are you saying some of my calculations are incorrect?

 

Fred_Funk

NatWest: seeking unlawful charges + interest incurred as a result of those charges of £4,292.82 and contractual interest (compounded) of £4,559.41. Court claim issued 16.01.08; acknowledgement of service filled by Cobbetts on 30.01.08

Link to post
Share on other sites

The £860.95 is £553 at 15.9% over three years - but that's not what we want to calculate anyway because it ignores the payments you made.

 

It goes back to what I said a few posts ago - we need to do this with dualcalc.

 

I'm tied up until later tonight (possibly tomorrow) but I'll try and have a look at it and come up with the 'right' answer

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...