Hsbc Dg Conning Letter WARNING PLEASE READ

[Hasselhoof]

I got exactly the same letter

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-bank/144632-me-hsbc.html#post1545772

 

I have my response there as well

[Hasselhoof]

One person, I could believe is an error, two is a bit dodgy, but four?

 

Are you going to leave it at that Pete or take this any further?

 

If I havent heard anything from DG by end of next week Ill lodge papers with the court asking for the stay to be lifted and an order to be made in my favour in line with the 'generous' offer to settle from HSBC

 

Regards

 

Mailman

 

I totally agree, 1 person, a mistake, 2 possibly a mistake, but 4, or more, no chance. Let me know how you get on with your stay, I'm thinking of going down this route too.

[Hasselhoof]

Hi guys, I finally got a reply from DG

 

Dear Sir

 

Yourself -v- HSBC Bank plc

Claim Number: YYYYYYYYY

 

We refer to your letter of 30th May 2008.

 

We advise that due to an administrative error our letter of 28th May 2008 quoted the incorrect claim number. It should have refered to your claim number XXXXXX and not the above claim.

 

For the avoidance of doubt, your above claim has been stayed and the position remains the same as outlined in our letter of 22nd August 2007.

 

Yours faithfully

 

DG

 

This is ironic, but also whoever wrote this has a poor grasp of English. For clarity, as I'm hiding the claim numbers, claim YYYYYY was finished over a year and a half ago, claim XXXXXX is stayed. They say the letter of 28th May 2008 should have refered to claim XXXXXX not the above claim (YYYYYYY).... ok.... Aren't they trying to explain that this was the other way around....

[Hasselhoof]

Not signed by him, but says please ask for Jason Newbold in the letter