Received in the post today, one order from the Court as follow:
Paragraph 2 of the Order made on 4th January 2007 stated:
I am trying to find out how the bank has decided upon it's lending to me, being the main purpose of my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request). I first raised a request in May 2006, and then a second in July 2006 with the following paragraph added:
I was then given bits of information, ignored, lied to and generally given a good run around by NatWest, for which their barrister has apologised in Court to me.
I asked the Judge if their were any Sanctions that she could enforce against Natwest to encourage them to comply with SARs in a more efficient and lawful manner. I was told to make my complaint to the Information Commissioners Office, which I shall be doing and Natwest are aware that I will be doing so.
In producing the witness statement, Natwest will have to sign a statement of truth. It will be interesting to see what they provide.
Edit: A huge thank you to a few people. You know who you are. x