Jump to content

Morr

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    76
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Morr

  1. I work within a big organisation split into smaller sub sections. In the other sub sections there is one person doing my job, but my sub section is much bigger so the role here is split between 2 people, myself and one other, we split the role normally done by one person. I have recently discovered that there has been an agreement to uplift the pay ranking of everyone doing the equivalent of my role, including the colleague who shares the role with me, giving them a nice payrise. I have not been uplifted, or been contacted about it. I have contacted HR to say I'm aware of this payrise and to ask why i was not considered. I have also sent them a job description of the normal singular role, where I have highlighted who does what out of the two of us, and the tasks are equal, if not slightly weighted on my role. My colleague has also only been here 18 months whilst i have been here much longer, and in fact I was the one responsible for training them. HR have agreed to reconsider my case, but I would still like answers as to why I wasn't considered the first time. Am I being treated unfairly? Am I right to be asking for answers as to why I wasn't considered? I have also found out I'm pregnant and whilst my immediate organisation are aware, HR are not aware as i don't want my impending Mat leave to have an influence on their decision now.
  2. Yes, I feel it's very sneaky for them to write there. That was an old address, but they have made contact with me at my newer addresses since then. I was paying them monthly payments but they stopped in 2010 when I had a baby and was on maternity leave. I'm 99.9% sure that after that I did not pay anything. I do recall a year or so ago trawling through bank statements for the last few years to see if there were any other payments, but it's always possible I have missed a one off card payment over the phone as it would not necessarily show up as them. I will sit tight for a bit longer and see if they carry on....
  3. Thanks Andy. Is it possible for them to be trying a sneaky CCJ by using an old address? Or is it not possible to do that due to the age of the debt? I'm pretty confident that the debt was not acknowledged within the last 6 years, but my memory isn't what it used to be, so don't want to rock the boat by sending them a letter and them replying saying I did pay something. I have had the date in my diary for some time, and it dropped off my credit file that month too, so I assumed I was correct, but don't want to chance them writing back!
  4. I have been chased for a number of years by Lowell for a debt. They go through phases of really chasing, then I don't hear anything for a while. In May of this year, the debt became statute barred. It has now disappeared from my credit file and my credit rating has gone to good again. However.... Lowell have REALLY started chasing the last few weeks. I have had letters galore, I have had about 5 phone calls a day and a couple of texts, and now they have started sending letters, addressed to me, to my parents house. My question is what action should I take. I know the debt is SB, but I'm concerned by their sudden chasing. Do I need to worry? Should I ignore it all, or should I write to them? I'm concerned as to why they are sending the letters to my parents address rather than mine, are they trying to get a CCJ by deliberately sending to the incorrect address? Is writing to them to tell them a debt is Statute Barred not an admission of ownership? Thanks everyone!
  5. Hi Dx, To clarify, I don't actually want any money from them via the reclaim, I just want them to agree the debt is settled to be honest and stop pursuing it (I realise this might be high hopes on my part!). As they are resuming debt collection activity, I wonder if I should write back and say that this matter is being disputed with the original creditor?
  6. My noddle report is pretty poor as it has 2 defaults on it which are 5 years old (and both currently being disputed). Today I paid the fee and viewed my experian report and that says I have excellent credit and no record of the 2 defaults? I have an old experian report from 2012 and that has one of the defaults on it, but not the other, but now they no longer appear on it. I even called experian to check, and she said there was no active record for them, so they are not part of the credit report. My 2012 report was in the region of ~700, but now it's mid 900's, and even says at the top that it has improved because there are no longer delinquent or defaulted accounts on it. One other thing that confuses me is that Experian have no record of my current bank account. They have my main bank account down as an old closed Barclays account. Again, I asked them and they said if the account was opened over 10 years ago it may be that my bank never agreed to share the information. So my credit score is now so good, do I risk calling my bank to ask them to share info? I've been a customer for 15+ years, have a 1500 OD that I basically live in. This may look negative!
  7. Hi All, I'm very confused today! I paid the £14.99 and joined experian (I had used up my free trial some years ago) and I nearly fell off my chair! My credit score is amazing, and it has no records of any defaults or delinquent accounts on there? And it has all my old addresses too. It does say that since 2012 my credit score has increased by 100 because there are no no longer defaulted accounts on there. I'm very confused....
  8. Hi All, It's been a long time since I updated! since my last post, I have received a few letters from Robinson Way saying their client is looking into the matter and they will get back to me, but I've had no direct response from JD Williams (who I had addressed the complaint too and the claim for charges as above). However, yesterday I received a debt collection letter from Robinson Way. Saying I have repeatedly failed to pay the account (the usual DCA letter they were sending before). So what has happened? I haven't yet heard back from the Creditors about my complaint, so how come they are suddenly resuming collection activity. Are they allowed to resume collection activity whilst the debt is being disputed? Any suggestions as to what I do next? Hold tight and let the letters come, or write back to Robinson Way saying that this matter is still in dispute? Thanks all!
  9. That is useful to know. So although the debts become SB (last payments made in Aug 2009) the defaults won't automatically come off until they are 6 years old? That's frustrating as they are there lingering on my credit file for another year then. Is it likely that these defaults are causing my low credit score? They aren't payday loans or anything. One is a very small credit card debt, and the other a catalogue debt.
  10. I use this forum and money saving expert forums foo. I have posted here before regarding my debt issues and have taken advice from other posters regarding the letters to send.
  11. Can you explain why I am a Goof as stated in your email above? When I say 3 letter process I mean the letters asking for CCA and not acknowledging letter and the SAR request.
  12. Hello, I have 2 current defaults on my credit file (both of which are being appealed). Both are from April 2010, and both debts become SB in August of this year. I am in contact with both debtors with the 3 letter process and nervously awaiting any action they may take before August. My question is regarding the affect these old defaults have. My noddle credit rating still say 1 out of 5 despite the fact I have no other problems and an up to date bank account and mobile phone contract, and on electoral role etc. What would happen after the 6 years, will these defaults disappear off my credit file, or do I have to request to have them removed. Could these 5 year old defaults be the reason my credit rating is so low? Thanks Everyone.
  13. Okay, will try and avoid conversing with them then.. will just keep a record of all letters and hope they don't send me a letter in BC's custom cream envelope!
  14. Oh God, you guys are hardcore! Sitting on my hands is so hard! In an ideal world I want to resolve this so i never get a court threat from BC's, but I know that you guys say I should just wait. Maybe I will wait a bit longer and see how quick they pick up speed. I'm SCARED!
  15. Hi All, yesterday I received the letter from lowells saying they were chasing me again for this debt. I'm surprised actually as I expected their first point of action to be to set Bryan Carter straight back onto me. what should I do now I have received this letter?! Do I start the whole process again? I actually disagree with lowells findings about my complaint (if you read above 1. they never responded to a CCA in 2010, and 2. Most importantly, in their letter they said they had ceased activity while they investigated my complaint in line with the OFT rules, but this is untrue as I was sent a letter by Bryan Carter while Lowell were investigating my complaint, I have a copy of the letter). DX told me to sit on my hands though, I haven't responded to lowells yet since their last letter. What should I do now?! Thanks all!
  16. I know Andy, born worrier! All this mess is my own making so guess I have to ride the stress out! Something else that has occurred to me - On this proof page that they have sent to me, it has my address, and it has the box saying 'time at the address' which i have put in as 9 months. But then there is just blank boxes under previous address, apart from postcode. Surely this company wouldn't have granted me credit if I didn't put full details of my previous address? It also has details of my employers, but under time at employers it says 0 years and 0 months. It also asks for my email address and the box says (if supplied). i have put my email address, but surely if i applied online I would have to give an email address, surely it would be a compulsary box rather than an option for them to email a response to? I'm not sure to be honest that I even had a computer, let alone internet at that time, so I'm unsure how i could have applied online?!
  17. Hello, The date on their records is March 2007, and this is the same date that is on my noddle report. I have no idea how this account would have been opened.... Some additional points I have just remembered; 1) I sent them a CCA request in 2010 and sent the £1 fee. I never heard back and they never ceased collection activity then. I know they received it as they cashed the £1 fee against my account. My noddle report has the figure the account was opened with and it is £1 more than it is now, so I assume they banked the CCA £1 toward the debt. This might all be a bit too long ago to complain about though. I only have a copy of the letter I sent them. 2) They say they ceased collection activity on 30th Jan 2014 while they investigated, but this isn't true, as I was sent a letter from Bryan Carter on 28th march 2014. So if they ceased activity, why was he contacting me?!
  18. Hi Andy, you are so brave! So you suggest just wait and see if I hear from them? IF i do wait and then get a letter to them again, will I then be able to put the account into dispute (so they stop collection activity) or do i have to do that again before the 30 days are up? My personal preference would be to get things resolved now, a s I hate stressing every day waiting to see what comes in the post, know what i mean?
  19. Hi Everyone, I received a letter from Lowells yesterday (they sent it signed for too!). This is a reply to my letter sent 4th june. don't believe they breached the OFT collection guidelines (about Bryan Carter chasing me). say that the account was opened online so there is no signed cca and i would have been expected to click a terms and conditions box online. sent a document which they say is sufficient as proof of the account. This looks just like a basic spreadsheet they have knocked up. also included a copy of some T&C's. The letter also goes on to say that even though they didn't get me the paperwork within 12 days, it is still enforceable because they have now provided it. They will now resume collection activity in 30 days. So, my questions are 1) What do I do now?! 2) is this spreadsheet 'really' proof that I ticked a terms and conditions box? it doesn't look very convincing 3) is the legislation about the time limit correct and is the debt still enforceable even though it took them 4 months to come back to me? 4) once the 30 days are up, is it likely that Bryan Carter will just go straight in for a court summons? Thanks everyone! keen to get writing to them this week so I don't get back into the 30 days loop.
  20. See attached my letter and my spreadsheet. Can you confirm this all looks correct?
  21. Quick question: When it says in the letter ' I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.' Is this talking about the CCA? As there is no CCA in the SAR they sent me, does this statement matter?!
  22. Oh okay, great! So they say I owe £612 (ordered goods worth £67, and paid over £150). So there wouldn't really be anything left to pay on the account. I will dig out the letter and post it up once i have amended it. Thanks!
  23. Okay great. What risk do I take by doing that. Can they still pursue court action if I have asked them for charges back? I'm scared if I get their back up by asking for them back, they will go all guns blazing! Can you direct me to the exact letter to use/ the letters I keep finding are to do with credit cards or PPI charges. Thanks so much for your help!
×
×
  • Create New...