Jump to content

Eversir

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    306
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Eversir

  1. Bit of a pain I know, but ignoring Npower's bills for a moment...are you able to start working out what energy you've consumed over the time period (meter readings you've taken/actual Npower reads you're fairly sure are correct)? Not always possible to do accurately, but if you start working out cost from units used and the tariff applicable at the time, too. This starts to build up an indication of what you might actually owe (ignoring back billing rules for the time being). Would also be handy if you put together a really simple list of when readings were taken or estimated, and by who and on what date. Then a perhaps a separate list of payments you've made and on which date. Lists like this can quickly be referred to by all concerned; not having to pick out stuff from paragraphs Good luck! It can be done!
  2. Npower pretty much ignored our request/demand for compensation as per the same criteria too. Next stage for us is court proceedings (once again), but you should probably exhaust all other avenues first. The Ombudsman is optional, but you might as well try it. Expect the worst, hope for the best where they are concerned. Try and get a better breakdown of your key complaints if you can - the above is very difficult to follow from an outsider's point of view. Nice concise bulleted lists of the key information, in chronological order really helps others provide constructive answers. Try cut out the waffle wherever possible
  3. This might be better in a different forum category as it's not directly related to a utility supplier. A mod should hopefully sort this for you. In the meantime double check your contract for any relevant clauses. Not terribly familiar with tenant/landlord related laws but if you could show financial loss that might be a cause for action. From what I recall, claiming for discomfort isn't particularly easy and probably not worth the hassle for just over a week in duration.
  4. The saga continues! Given the recent decision by Ofgem, particularly their order in regards to compensating the worst affected customers, we thought it would be worthwhile sending Npower a quick letter of complaint (unsurprisingly we don't trust Npower's advice that we 'don't need to do anything'). Per Npower's own publication on its website, they should be awarding at least £200 compensation based on the criteria. In the letter we briefly outlined Npower's unacceptable conduct, highlighted the fact that they have still failed to remove the incorrect credit file entries, and provided a bullet list of what actions we'd like to be taken. Amazingly this was a single A4 page. Npower responded a couple of days ago, via email and not return mail (once again). Here is their response: Will be dropping a rather terse response to what is, clearly, a bit of a fob-off from Npower's customer service department. Wonder if they have a bulk closure exercise for this too? Update to follow.
  5. Npower have made a press release regarding compensation for affected customers (past and present): http://www.npower.com/home/customer/index.htm#tab-4 [ATTACH=CONFIG]60637[/ATTACH]
  6. You'll probably find this exercise will exceed the value of your claim. Chances are it wouldn't be allowed as the costs are disproportionate; failing that it is unlikely you'd be allowed to recover it even if you won. It still wouldn't rule out the possibility you borrowed a device or asked a friend to do it, so it doesn't actually prove you didn't send it. My point is, the burden of proof lies with Halfords. If they want to make wild accusations that damage your character, they better be able to back them up.
  7. Pointless excercise, IMO. Unless the IP addresses match, it wouldn't prove it wasn't you, just as they couldn't prove it was you without some extremely intensive data forensics. They need to either substantiate the allegation they are making or retract it. It is defamatory in nature and they should know better.
  8. Looking at this objectively, try and see things from the judge's perspective on the day. Chances are they are not going to be 100% knowledgable with vehicle mechanics and will have to rely on the evidence presented to them on the day; whether from you, Halfords or an independent expert witness (if instructed). As much as you know you've been wronged (and Halfords are no doubt pretty aware of it), the judge is an outside party; the legal system is overburdened at the moment and as it stands it really could go either way. To have been offered pretty much the full amount prior to a hearing, you clearly have enough of a case that it worries Halfords. If nothing else, take pride in that. It is more justice than most receive. Is the prospect of an extra ~9% that you'll have to spend £x on, with what might be a 50% chance of winning really worth two months of preparation and stress? Only you can decide that. The experience of a court room on the day is certainly worth something, but choose your battles wisely
  9. Think that was our fault to be honest. We didn't lay out these costs clear enough in the claim so he was unable to make an award on that basis. You live and you learn
  10. Quite a serious allegation on their part. Not withstanding, the thing you need to consider is how likely you are to be awarded a sum greater than what they are offering you. If the answer is the same or less, take the money and have a less stressful start to 2016!
  11. Here we go. The judgement was split into two, but this one is more relevant to Npower's conduct. I have highlighted particular areas of interest (e.g. the judge's criticism of Npower). I'll try and find time to post parts of the other documents in due course (probably next week). Hope this is of use to someone!
  12. Sorry, the files were not the easiest to redact and time has been an issue this past month or so. Uploading the judgement shortly. Thanks for the kind words! Yes, it was bloody awful in some ways but incredibly satisfying to get a judgement in our favour (even if we didn't get a bunch of money from it).
  13. They did previously, but their March 2015 terms don't include a clause like that any more. In the absence of any specific mention, one would assume it reasonable to have 30 days' notice if the customer is adversely affected.
  14. Clause 17.1 of their terms and conditions, dated March 2015 stated the following: So assuming the changes meet those criteria, then once again Npower are incorrect and don't appear to understand their own terms and conditions. The changes came into effect when they told you. There is no other particularly relevant clause in regarding other T&C changes, although clause 6)a) of their previous contract dated October 2013 stated: Interesting they removed it.
  15. They have actually paid the bailiff; the Court is just taking time to transfer the funds Will consider taking Npower back to Court if they don't make good the false credit entries. Still to be published. Will need certain personal info redacting first.
  16. Still waiting for the Court to pay that to us. Should be this week. As tempting as it is! Giving them a day or so for a separate letter to come through, then will call or write. They still haven't removed their false credit entries, so there is that to sort out yet also.
  17. Recently received a mystery cheque from Npower for £25.00. Not a clue what this is relating to; merely states: "As promised, here is a cheque for £25.00". Very, very strange...
  18. OK, a bit longer than a week but... Npower failed to comply with the Court Order and either forgot - or chose not - to pay by the deadline stipulated by the judge. In fact, even two months on we have not had a payment from Npower. As a result of this, the CCJ against Npower was enforced. Bailiffs were instructed to recover the sum from Npower's head office in Swindon. We have now been informed they have finally recovered the money after visiting their premises last week; we should receive this from the Court shortly. Funnily enough the County Court bailiffs informed us that we were not the only ones with a successful judgement against Npower; they were also enforcing judgements for other people at the same time as ours. Apparently they visit Npower on an almost-weekly basis for this sort of thing.
  19. Perhaps my misunderstanding, but from the way the OP has written it would seem that they attempted to transfer to Scottish Power upon moving in to the property. They only later discovered that Npower had blocked the transfer of the electricity supply (and not the gas) - presumably due to a debt owed by a previous tenant. The first the OP knew of this was when a MeterPlus came to install a prepayment meter. From the sounds of it, the OP hasn't made a note of meter readings - particularly the starting read - and now Npower is trying to bill on a figure that may include usage from the previous tenant as well as their own. Granted it isn't particularly clear and it would be helpful if the OP will clarify this. Npower certainly shouldn't have blocked the transfer for the new tenant. Is Npower charging you one of their more expensive tariffs for electricity, and would you have gotten a better deal with SP had the transfer not been wrongly blocked? If so, you perhaps need to be working out how much money you are now worse-off due to Npowers mistake. As Conniff quite rightly says, you will have to pay for your electricity usage - the backbilling rules won't apply here I don't think. You need to check with your letting agent / landlord whether they have the final meter readings for the previous tenant.
  20. I'd consider getting an SAR sent to both Scottish Power and Npower to see what information they hold about you and what information has been communicated. They have 40 days to respond, so get the ball rolling now. Also read the customer services guide and record your calls!
  21. 1. Nope. You are not liable for another tenant's debt. 2. This is a tricky one. Really you should have recorded one, but so should the landlord. You should really have given initial meter readings to the current provider, which would have been Npower. Failing that I think the utility company is allowed to use a reasonable estimate. That would likely be a product of the number of days you were in the property multiplied by a reasonable daily usage (for the size of property, the number of occupants and time of year). 3. Depends on the situation, the length of time and the actual damages you have suffered as a result. Need to understand the situation with transferring to Scottish Power in more detail. Did SP contact you to say the move had been blocked? Did Npower contact you?
×
×
  • Create New...