Michael Browne
-
Posts
15,096 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
44
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by Michael Browne
-
Thereis a missing sign : https://goo.gl/maps/j8zgZ6yxujuB6S3o7 although there is a sign round the corner: https://goo.gl/maps/DoUVK3DXMRQ2HU3H7 If your father lives in the area he must be aware of the CPZ and it's restrictions, why does he noot have a resident permit?
-
What's the exact location? Post a google streetview link
-
French Fixed charge for alledged speeding
Michael Browne replied to Poppy's father's topic in Speeding and Motoring Offences
Except bottom right 'You are appealing against the offence' , Ground 2: 'Another driver was using the vehicle at the time of the offence' , implies you can transfer liability (at least initially) -
I would think that the wording of the original agreement will be crucial and whether it says anything about what happens if you withdraw your consent. After 15 years do you or any of your neighbours still have a copy?
-
Harrow PCN
Michael Browne replied to JollyCinders's topic in Local Authority Parking and Traffic Offences
Sadly I think an adjudicator would say that teh no entry was clearly and sufficiently signed. Everything else you say is merely mitigaton and adjudicators generally cannot take mitigation into account. Ironically either of the other two options would not have resulted in a pcn. Discount looks the best coiurse. -
It's likely that the CPZ is meant to run from the end of the red route as shown in GSV in 2009 https://goo.gl/maps/T3S4hhop1X72 but by 2012 that sign has disappeared and been replaced by one in the current position https://goo.gl/maps/eFvJhaF5mMH2 which effectively leaves the SYL in no-mans-land without timeplate and not covered by a CPZ
-
If that were the case the reverse of the CPZ entry sign would also be an entry sign. It's not: https://goo.gl/maps/BFcq3SqFruB2 If you cross Brixton Hill the next CPZ starts at the end on the red route lines in Brixton Water Lane.
-
I agree, there should be a timeplate for the SYL. It's doubtful that Lambeth will agree, so you need to be prepared to go to adjudication
-
Goldfish pay up with barely a fight
Michael Browne replied to Michael Browne's topic in Other Institutions
This topic was closed on 10 March 2019. If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there. If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened. - Consumer Action Group -
This topic was closed on 09 March 2019. If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there. If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened. - Consumer Action Group
-
The debt won''t be registered with TEC until the councl send you the Order for Recovery, At that point you can make a witness statement to TEC that you didn't receive the PCN . The OfR will have details of how to do this.
-
As long as the drveway is not a shared drive way the following exemption applies:
-
1. Yes, normally with a notice of the Traffic Regulation Order in the local paper 2. No DYL's are 24/7 so no sign needed 3. In theory yes, in practice no 4. The TRO should mention the length of the lines
-
You can view the page at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?916-Orange-backtracks-on-free-broadband-axe-but-only-if-customers-complain or https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/bills/article-2225654/Orange-backtracks-free-broadband-axe--customer-keeps-complaining.html#ixzz2C2Ue7lX3
-
https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/review-of-enforcement-agent-bailiff-reforms/consultation/intro/
-
Absolutely, but without sufficient grounds you are going to have to bite the bullet and pay. If you don't within 14 days of their letter, it will go back up to £165 and will escalate even higher if you're not careful.
-
Well, you could prove he was lying by producing evidence that you were parked somewhere else, except of course that you can't. It's odd that you question the honesty of a CEO whilst being perfectly prepared to lie yourself.
-
Yeah, good idea, The council won't cancel the pcn and if you continue the lie to adjudication you open yourslf to a fine of up to £5000.
-
Your narrative is muddled, but I think you're saying you didn't receive the Notice to Owner in your name. Even though the council say it was sent, and you say they have now sent the Charge Certificate (where the penalty increases to £165) they are prepared to accept £110. Since you don't seem to have any grounds for the pcn to be cancelled, that's proably the best outcome. The alternative is you wait for the Order for Recovery and make a Witness Statement that you did'nt receive the NtO. That sets it back to the NtO stage where you can make representations and when they are rejected appeal to adjudication, where, on the basis of your non-existent grounds, you will lose.
-
DYL are 24/7 so the prescribed hours are at any time. The 01 contravention is correct.
-
It's almost certainly an auto-response, it doesn't mean they're taking it seriously since so far no human has read your email.
-
They're right. Once paid any appeal avenues are closed.
-
From the council pic it looks like you parked between lamp post 035 (which has the P for 30 mins) and the telephone box here: https://goo.gl/maps/9t8jc8PgCmJ2 The loading bay sign is further down outside the Hare & Tortoise. This sign is parallel to the carriageway (it should be at right angles to it, so facing on-coming traffic) and so it's perfectly understandable why you didn't see it/ look any further. There should be a clear demarcation where there are two different restrictions between the two. I would make reps before the 21 day deadline and also phone TFL and ask them to send a copy of the video
-
What is the addresss on your V5c registration document. Is it the same as your current address? You should have received a Notice to Owner, a Charge Certificate and an Order for Recovery. It's unlikely all 3 have gone astray, unless the V5c is still showing an old address
-
I would definitely appeal to London Tribunals. a) you now have nothing to lose, even if your appeal is refused, you will still only owe £130. b) IMO you have a very good chance of winning and owe nothing.
