Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 22/12/21 in all areas

  1. Well done, you have done your Christmas vacation homework and you get 9/10. When we see your draft particulars of claim we will consider offering you the final missing mark.
    1 point
  2. Just updating this thread to summarise my details. I sold an iPhone (in original packaging) on eBay for £700. I purchased shipping with InPost via eBay Packlink on 26th October 2021 I did not pay for "enhanced" insurance. I dropped off the parcel (Boxed iPhone within brown "postage" box) at an InPost locker on 26th October 2021. The Buyer told me (and thankfully sent me a lot of pictures) that the iPhone itself was missing from its original box, but that there was no obvious signs of tampering. I contacted Packlink claiming for £700, after some back-and-forths they confirmed with me that their investigations discovered that my parcel was tampered with. They automatically refunded me £25 even though I made it clear I was after the full amount. My next steps: I will now Email InPost directly to make a formal claim. I will give them 10 days to reply. InPost will more than likely deny responsibility and won't refund me. In which case, I will have to draft a letter of claim and begin legal process against InPost. The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 legislation allows me to begin legal proceedings against InPost (a UK registered company) and not Packlink (a Spain registered company). I will continue to read this sub-forum. Thanks again everyone, you have no idea how much I appreciate this.
    1 point
  3. Confusing. Well, maybe you should start with the forum sticky about court claims from PPCs and tell us the answers for the current one please. HB
    1 point
  4. You do realise you are saying that to someone living under Johnson and his civil war cabal, for whom simple muppetry would be a vast improvement Yes
    1 point
  5. Hi You have still not answered the questions I asked in post#29, you need to answer the questions asked and not bypass them The Garden not cleared and the notice not given it all depends what is in the Agreement your DAUGHTER THE LANDLORD signed with the Letting Agency. Irrespective the Tenant signed for the property and whatever rubbish is in that Garden if they haven't bothered to report it to letting agency is the Tenants responsibility to get removed. On the other hand since you have asked the Letting Agency to get this rubbish removed again depends what in Agreement signed and the Letting Agency may charge the Landlord for doing so note the may. As for the Notice again depends on Agreement signed but is there any reason that your DAUGHTER THE LANDLORD can't do this and forward copies to Letting Agency? As for the water issue with the next door property you would need to get a proper report done as to the cause and the cost to rectify I do hope your Daughter has Buildings Insurance as you will need to request the next door Landlords Insurance Details. As for doing a letter and posting it to the next door neighbour letter box when you state the tenants don't speak English how do you expect it to get passed to the Landlord of that property. 1. Do your research of the property next door internet is a wonderful resource. 2. As all Landlords need to be registered with the Council try asking the Council (they may not give Landlords details due to Data Protection) but no harm in asking. 3. Check the Land Registry for the Property (there is a cost for this service) Sorry but your DAUGHTER THE LANDLORD really need to register and be asking all this as dealing with this via a THIRD PARTY that does not answer questions asked that are relevant is making this difficult and your Daughter need to take a more pro active approach to this and do her research as I have said previously the Internet is a wonderful resource.
    1 point
  6. This is the past MOT which was done 14 days before it was passed Date tested3 November 2021 FAIL View test certificate Mileage99,484 miles Do not drive until repaired (dangerous defects): Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) Repair immediately (major defects): Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii)) Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.1.2 (h)) Offside Rear Anti-roll bar ball joint excessively worn Link (5.3.4 (a) (i)) Service brake excessively binding Both rear (1.2.1 (f)) Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i)) Monitor and repair if necessary (advisories): Service brake binding but not excessively Both front (1.2.1 (f))
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...