Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

scottandchris Vs woolwich


scottandchris
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6177 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

First time posting here, have been reading lots of info, great site

I have sent my SAR off to barclays/woolwich on the 3rd may, the 40 days are up today and i havn't had any contact at all from them.

I did send my letter (recorded delivery) to the data protection people at Radbroke hall, Knutsford, as this is where i had previously had a letter from.

Have i made a mistake sending it there or should they have forwarded it on.

 

thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi S&C

 

You were perfectly right to send your SAR to Radbroke and I would recommend that you go online to Royal Mail site and print off the confirmation page and/or electronic signature (unlikely you'll need it but always good as definitive proof should it go to court).

 

Fine that you've sent a LBA and moere than likely you'll get a standard auto response letter back. Unless you get the list of charges within 7 days (say 8 for postal politeness!), you can immediately claim for costs either via MCOL or by taking claim down to you local court.

 

I did it thru MCOL. If you do need to claim, you can pm me if you need any templates etc to use. Please note that if you are on a low income/benefits and are exempt from the £30 court fee, use your local court as you don't get the option to opt out if using MCOL.

 

Also, you can go online to ICO site and make an online complaint. ICO doesn't have any powers to penalise and they are approaching banks with en masse complaints once a month because of sheer quantity being submitted, however it does demonstrate to the bank that you're not a pushover and that you put your money where your mouth is.

 

My MCOL included my costs incurred so far and I have recently received offer from Litigations dep't to settle in full as long as I discontinue. Problem is if you accept and they haven't sent out your charge list, it's more delay so be sure you accept settlement only on condition they send the list of charges as per the date of your original SAR ... they are currently trying to fob me off with a 6 yr list that only goes back 6 yrs from most recent communication when in fact my original SAR was sent 3rd Nov 2006 (so they are avoiding including charges from NOv 2000 - June 2001).

 

Barclays are proving to be a right pain with more and more instances of DPA breaching so you're not alone.

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi S&C

 

Have you received your statements/list of charges? Nothing else they may have sent (like a standard blurb investigation letter) counts. If you don't have that list, MCOL them for DPA breach (remember you're claiming costs to pursue (with an applying 8% Stat Interest as well as court fee costs). You Particulars of Claim must also include that you're seeking compliance with DPA ie for them to satify legal obligation to provide the transaction list as per and date relative to the original SAR.

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

sorry for the delay, my mom was rushed to hospital last week and been a bit distracted.

I havnt had a thing off them, not even a standard letter.

So i am going to mcol them, what can i claim for as im not to sure.

many thanks for the reply

 

s&c

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI S&C

 

Sorry to hear abut mum, hope she's on the mend.

You are well within your rights to MCOL them for breach of DPA however you might get a faster resolution by simply ringing them, explaining that you haven't had a response to SAR and will they post them out immediately to avoid taking it to court. Give the mail til Wednesday then MCOL.

 

The alternative is to simply MCOL them anyway. The advantage of this is that you are using the muscle of the law to demonstrate to them that you mean business. You can alternatively file straight a t your local court and tbh this would probably be far quicker as MCOL is snowed under and many people are finding their claim processing slow.

 

Just because they haven't sent through the charges, doesn;t mean you need delay your Preliminary letter for refund (I did and I wish I hadn't) - all you need to do is estimated the charges for last 6 years and include an explaination in the letter as to why you have had to do this and invite them to provide an accurate breakdown of the charges, whereupon you'll amend the figure.

 

If you'd like any of the letters/court applications, PM me and I send you through mine.

Barclays offer to settle my DPA breach claim in full and I recently wrote to them saying ok but I accept on condition you still send through my statements. They haven't responded yet but it's ok, as the claim is still plodding on and I've sent my Preli letter so any delays on this DPA breach no longer affects my claim for charges to be returned.

 

(Sorry, quick typing cos going out so excuse any typos)

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I always think it's best to direct calls to the department who *should* have a record of your last communication.

 

Their number is 01565 614000

 

Their Fax is 01565 613583

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

I phoned the radbroke hall number and they informed me that they are no longer dealing with woolwich customers and gave me another number at barclays.

When i phoned them they told me that i had already logged a complaint with them regarding my sar (which i hadnt) on the 20th june, they also said that they were still within the 40 days timescale to provide my statements, when i informed them that the original letter was sent on the 3rd may and that the 40 days were up and i had also sent a lba, they just said continue with you claim then, they wasnt bothered at all.

so i will have to go through mcol now, more hassle and more expense, the only thing that keeps me going is the help from this site.

welshcakes if you could send me the templates i would be most appreciative.

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI S&C

 

Sorry, just logged on to internt. Will send the 1st of the template letters.

 

Could you please post the new tel number they gave you - it will help alot of people reading this who are about to enter dispute over non-compliance.

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry for the delay, been hectic 2 weeks.

The number they gave me was the Barclays Customer Relations - 08457 555 555.

Ive now got a letter from them explaining that they have made a mistake and that my statements will be with me within 28 days.

So as im in no hurry at the moment so i am prepared to wait until they come through, i know i should get a claim going as they didnt respond within 40 days but at the moment with so many other thing going on (mom still in hospital) i havnt the time.

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...