Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

The Light Brigade V's Barclaycard "WON"


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6001 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Mastercard: N1 done, just waiting for the confirmation etc.

Visa: received a final response letter this morning, (I havent had an initial response) offering the charges £120 as they cant access the account due to it being closed. They managed to access the account for the sar though??

I called them this morning to query what was going on but their systems are down and supposed to get a call back. If they cant access the information then they got the £120 figure from my SOC, so they can also get the interest figure from my SOC. I will call them again to see if the IT guy has been(reboot, unplug, clean the screen)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi TLB,

 

With respect, you're wasting your time on the phone to them - they just give you the run around.

 

If they offer what you want in a letter, take it.

 

If not, sue the beggars for it.

 

Slick

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I called them back and spoke to someone dealing with my visa claim, they are offering the charges, no interest either 8% or the 27.9% I had on my SOC, and no default removal. She said they don't pay interest??

Looking for advice please, if I N1 them, how likely are they to pay the interest of £300+ ?? I am not that bothered about the default and forgot about it in my prelim but included it in the LBA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick, I know I shouldnt ring them, but my patience seems to be running out, I have about 6 claims in progress and it just seems to be dragging on, I wish they had offered to pay the mastercard charges in full, could have paid the bills then!

I think I just need to re focus...................

Link to post
Share on other sites

TLB,

 

I've asked for Site Helper to look in - I'm out of my depth beyond s.69 int't @ 8% !

 

Slick

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

She was right on the phone. They dont pay interest. You have to file your N1 to get the interest.

 

But if you have been offered the full charge amount, then basically you have won!

 

You have been awarded the amount you origanaly asked for.

 

If you take it to a judge to claim CI after you have been awarded your requested amount, then im afraid the chances are not vey good.

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sea-sidelady,

 

Would it have been better to ask for CI from the outset, ie Prelim Letter. Or is the problem here that BC are willing to refund all the charges without question.

 

Like to know for my own thread and for future ref.

 

Thanks, Slick

 

PS Hope your puter's better now.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Slick.

 

You are supposed to ask for CI at the start of your claim.

 

But yes, it is because they are offering all the charges before court.

 

There are plenty of threads, where people have won their charges, then fought on for the CI and it has been thrown out.

 

But obviously it is a personal choice wether to do it or not.

 

 

 

Puter is over worked me thinks....!!

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi SSL, Slick

I requested £120 charges and £357 interest with my prelim and LBA. BC have offered a goodwill gesture of £120 as they cant access the account information anymore. So technically is this a goodwill gesture that coinidently equals the charges or deemed a refund of charges?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was still getting calls from Mercers despite explaining without breach of DPA that the missus is not well enough to speak with them so called Littlewoods and after a bit she eventually called Mercers while I was on hold and arranged a 14 day stop on calls, this allows enough time for the CCA to arrive(or not). This is after I had just spoken to Mercers and asked them yet again to stop the calls as I have explained the situation and now deem the calls as harrassment, she just said the calls will continue as they need to speak with the missus, so I explained again that they will not be able to for at least a month, maybe 2...........thick as sh*t springs to mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you send the harassment letter?

 

They DONT have to speak to hear. Any thing they need to say has to be written correspondance only.

 

If you have sent the harassment letter in the link Slick gave you, then senf this one.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-1038615.html

 

If they phone, hang up, or leave them talking to them selves while you go make a brew!!:D

  • Haha 1

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

TLB,

 

As they've denied their chgs are unlawful isn't it "a refund of the chgs, being made as a gesture of goodwill".

 

Call it what you like, but are you going to take it or hang out for CI.

 

Did you see Noomill's comments on my thread.

 

Slick

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick

I am not sure what to do, I have claimed the interest from the start, so I might N1 them and see what happens, I have already sent an N1 for the Mastercard account. All my CC claims have been for interest form prelim letter, so if I use this one as a test to see what happens?? MBNA have also paid the charges element as good will gestures. I think I will see it through...................maybe

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi TLB,

 

Also may be an idea to see what Noomill advises on my thread.

 

Did you use the advanced CC spreddy on this site and how much do you charge for lessons.

 

Slick

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used 27.9% as that is what I have been charged, thats why £120 charges attracts £360+ of interest. I used 19.9% to test my calc and got a few pence less than your posting. I was more concerned that I was over calculating. Have you claimed and won the interest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 days have passed, no correspondence from them. maybe something to do with the postal chaos so I will wait a couple of days.

I had sent recorded delivery but not showing on site as signed for yet. RAng royal mail and they said give it 15 days and if it has not arrived I will get a book of stamps!

Assuming they have received the CCA request and are ignoring it, what is my next move? Is the acount now in dispute?

Link to post
Share on other sites

N1 time for the visa card now, I have not heard anything since their final letter, so they have had the full 14 days anyway. Still not had the court copy for the mastercard either, this blinkin' postal strike!!

So I have 3 N1's to do on monday, with another 3 simmering away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I would re send the CCA request. As you mentioned the postal strikes played havoc recently and ideally you need proof they received it on a given date.

 

Remember to put 'I acknowledge no debt to your company' on the letter and a note saying the £1 is not to be allocated to your account but as a fee for the request.

 

If you haven't already done so, send Mercers a letter simply saying the account is in dispute until such a time as Barclays provide me with a true copy of my agreement. If you haven't already sent the harrassment leter to them (mercers) simply add the dispute comments to it and send ASAP.

 

In my experience Barcays rarely have copies of original agreements and in most cases prescribed terms are missing meaning by virtue of section 127 (3) the alleged debt is unenforcable by law. However, I've only dealt with accounts that were opened before 2000 and it may be they learnt their lessons and started keeping better records, just have to wait and see what they send you.

 

regards,

shane

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the post this morning i received a letter from Barclaycard

"In order for us to disclose information and to continue processing your request we will require your signed authorisation"

 

They have returned our letter with a received stamp of 4th Oct.

 

SSL in post #4 advised not to sign the request, should I return the signed letter now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...