Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Robbersway and citi loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4517 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Complain to the OFT online, when the OFT send you their letter, remove your e-mail address. Send a copy of the OFT letter with a copy of the latest RW threat letter. Send it Recorded.

 

One would have thought so, but this is the second case on here where they have started to chase a debt in dispute due to lack of a cca request being complied with, time the OFT were informed methinks
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

PG,

They seem quiet fearce but surely if robbinscum can not produce a valid cca or at all,there is no case against debtors.

 

Well there will be a percentage that give up as soon as the court papers hit the mat and its those that finance the ones that fight back tbh. No CCA SHOULD be enough but it is down to a judge on the day and two sides convincing him/her of their case.... bad decisions happen and without the will or finances to appeal for a potential better standard of judge.....

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I now believe there was a charge of £850 forppi

And a charge of £900 for interest on the ppi can anything be done about theese

This whole thing dates from 2006 r/way rekon they own the alledged debt but have never recieved any thing any time stating this after reading other threads I rekon court claim shortly from end.

Edited by safc
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi safc

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/factsheets/payment-protection-insurance.pdf

 

Provided you've been Mis-sold PPI. Send a covering letter, the FOS PPI Questionnaire and the speadsheet to work out the interest to the original creditor. You should find the correct single Premium PPI spreadsheet in the links below, care of ims. Send the claim Recorded.

 

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI

Read Here

 

 

I now believe there was a charge of £850 forppi

And a charge of £900 for interest on the ppi can anything be done about theese

This whole thing dates from 2006 r/way rekon they own the alledged debt but have never recieved any thing any time stating this after reading other threads I rekon court claim shortly from end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The alledged debt in this thread would possiblly have had credit agreement dateing to june 2006

From what I have read is it that because it is pre 2007 a signed copy still has to be produced

Will my cca request to r/way still stand form june 2007 which they never replyed to

or should I send another to ind

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...