Approved Car Finance

[shudntbhere1]

So sorry to keep posting this.

 

I brought my car from acf on the 12/2/07, it broke down 8 days later with a faulty water pump. ACF took the car to their garage for repair 18 days later the car was returned. 2 weeks after that the car broke down again with a water pump fault. This time the finance company agreed that I could have the repair done locally at there expense, however when they done the repair they found that

 

a) the water pump had not been replaced

 

they had changed the head gasket

 

c) they had put the old cam belt back on

 

d) they had missed off a bolt

 

e) I had to front tyres nearly illegal

 

f) there was misting in the gearbox

 

g) my fog lights weren’t working

 

Local garage have said due to old cam belt being put back on, this car was a death trap, if the cam belt had snapped we would lose all electrics including breaks and power steering.

 

The finance co have said they will not cover the expense but ACF will, the car has now gone back to them for investigating.

 

During the first repair I had to hire cars as I work out of town at my expense. And now I am having to do this again.

 

Also on checking all through my papers I did not get the £1000 trade in for my old car this was reduced to 1 pence because of tax? Strangely this was after we had been persuaded to up my deposit to£1000.

 

The mechanical breakdown I was advised to take out only covers £300 worth of repair and the list of things it excludes is longer than what is covered.

 

Total cost of having my car for 2 months

 

Deposit 1000

 

Advertised Trade in 1000

 

HP instalment 356.22

 

Hire cars 552

 

Telephone Calls 50

 

---------

 

Total Cost 2958.22

 

Do we pursue legal action? Will a solicitor take this on? Or do we allow them to look at car and then fix it, possibly sending back a death trap?

 

Please help.

[Yasmin]

Hi, Sorry to hear of your problems. They're supposed to perform a million point check, aren't they! Can't you go for misrepresentation. Sure they must be in breach of contract. Did they finance you, or Welcome??? Interested, because I have pending court action with Approved C F and Welcome Finance!

[Yasmin]

Hi, Sorry to hear of your problems. They're supposed to perform a million point check, aren't they! Can't you go for misrepresentation? Sure they must be in breach of contract. Did they finance you, or Welcome??? Interested, because I have pending court action with Approved C F and Welcome Finance!

[shudntbhere1]

The finance is through First response. Yeah 136 point check they supposodly do.

 

Sorry can I ask what your pending court action is for? We are thinking of court action, but wary of it.

[StormWarrior]

http://www.tradingstandards.gov.uk/milton-keynes/E16%20Unroadworthy%20Vehicles.pdf

 

Check out this leaflet for another angle of attack.

[Yasmin]

My pending court case is primarily for "misrepresentation" at time of purchase. However other issues have now arisen, and I will be considering adding these to my defense, so I am taking advice....

[patdavies]

So sorry to keep posting this.

 

I brought my car from acf on the 12/2/07, it broke down 8 days later with a faulty water pump. ACF took the car to their garage for repair 18 days later the car was returned. 2 weeks after that the car broke down again with a water pump fault. This time the finance company agreed that I could have the repair done locally at there expense, however when they done the repair they found that

 

a) the water pump had not been replaced

 

Did they claim that they had, or merely 'repaired' it?

 

they had changed the head gasket

 

At least they looked at this after a water pump failure - many wouldn't in this circumstance. It is possible that this was the cause of the overheating, not the waterpump. Have you asked. or did they state this?

 

c) they had put the old cam belt back on

 

It is not necessary to fit a new belt every time. If in inspection, the cambelt is satisfactory, it can be refitted. So what you have is a difference of opinion between two garages as to the state of the cambelt

 

d) they had missed off a bolt

 

Carelessness or negligence perhaps. But was it actually there before they started work?

 

e) I had to front tyres nearly illegal

Easily seen by you before you bought the car. Only if they are actually illegal is the garage at fault. If you had noticed these, and brought it to the attention of the garage and they agreed to replace as part of the sale. then you have grounds to complain

 

f) there was misting in the gearbox

I am not sure what you mean by this, but if it is oil-misting then this isn't at all unusual when you have gears rotating at high speed in a bath of oil and it is actually providing additional lubrication

 

g) my fog lights weren’t working

 

Same as tyres above. Did you check them and ask the garage to fix them before you agreed to purchase. Non-working foglights (front) do not make the car unroadworthy

 

Local garage have said due to old cam belt being put back on, this car was a death trap, if the cam belt had snapped we would lose all electrics including breaks and power steering.

 

The finance co have said they will not cover the expense but ACF will, the car has now gone back to them for investigating.

 

 

Please see comments in red. I think that you have been exceedingly unlucky, but some of your points would not stand up in court - or even trigger a response from the garage/finance company

[wonkydonkey]

hi i bought a car from the same place with the same finance company in nov 06 mine had a fault with the water pump but i demanded i took it to a garage of my choice and they paid which i did and they did....i now have a thread going about first response who i am haing diffculties with.....a million point check my f****** a** they dont care just intrested in getting their sales

[shudntbhere1]

Hi thanks for the reply. Just an update, First response are paying in full to have it all fixed at the place of our choice, its being done as we speak! Took a long time but finally got it sorted. I suspect that they will be suing ACF for the money afterwards though. Good luck with first response.

[shudntbhere1]

Hi,

 

Just to add, after them paying to fix the problems back then.

 

Today the engine has blown, going to cost £2000 to fix.

 

Now not sure what to do? As in repairs this year car has cost nearly more then it is worth.

 

However not sure where we stand now, having owned the car for eight months.

 

We would be happy for them to just take the car back and stop the contract, with no refund. But think they will probably fight that too.

 

Any advice?

[Wigster69]

With the issue of not getting the £1,000 for your part exchange, you need to check the paperwork. The common practice of "writing back" deals does not mean that you are having to spend more money. Infact, depending on whether you have any finance outstanding on a part-exchange, "writing back" a deal can often be the only way to get the best deal from a garage. Any garage that sells a car is liable to pay VAT on the difference between the selling price of the car, less any costs (warranties, RFL etc), and the price that the garage paid for the vehicle in the first place. If they give you £999.99 less for your part exchange, you should find that your top-line cost of buying the vehicle has also dropped by £999.99, so that the balance payable is exacty the same figure that they agreed with you when the deal was done.