Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Northern rock ask to set aside default judgement


N#1N#2
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6275 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My Request for access were issued some weeks ago. the Northern rock responded within 30 days with statements, charges total £3500, which i have issued the claim letter from the libary with the excel spreadsheet.

TSB have not responded yet, getting anxious, but will wait another 10 days for the total 40 days to elapse.

Next step I understand a letter of compliant and copy the information officer??

Any standard letter format available for this??

Are the TSB always slow to react.

 

Any advice on the next steps

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi there and welcome. There is nothing to worry about. You will find a letter before action for non-compliance of the Data Protection Act in the Bank Templates Library.

 

As well as familiarising yourself with the FAQ's, start a thread in each of the forums for the banks you deal with so others claiming from the same bank can offer advice and support. Read some of the threads there, especially the successes, so you can see what is likely to happen with your own claims.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I need some guidance.

  1. Recieved statements from Bank
  2. Issued charges letter
  3. recieved first response from bank saying sorry and they will invetsigate
  4. Today recieve another letter, long winded but will copy some items from it. All within the specified time

Extract from letter

'Northern rock refutes any suggestions that the charges applied to my account are either unlawful, unfair and represent a penalty. Small blub about terms and conditions?'

Next Reference to OFT report dated 5th april 2006, in which high levels of penalties were considered to be unfair. This pronouncement was in relation to default charges on credit card accounts and not service charges on current accounts as in this case. As an aside it is for the courts rather than the OFT to decide what is or is not unlawful'

You also make reference to a regime that is"unlawful at common law, statue and recent consumer regulations" without identifying the common law,statute or consumer regulations or indeed specific sections or regulations you seek to rely on.

They then state that the charges applied to my current account represent a core term of the contract i have with the northern Rock.

A little bit more about there terms and conditions.

The next bit a little more interesting

'With regards to the threat of court proceedings, northern rock plc looks forward to receiving your substantive response to the legal points rasied above, prior to the issue of any proceeedings. for the reasons set out above. Northern Rock plc does not consider that the letter recieved 2 november 2006 discloses any reasonable grounds to bring a claim against it, and nor if such a claim were issued that it would have any prospect of success.

In the event that proceedings are issued without your having provided a substantive response to the legal issues raised Northern rockl plc reserves the right to bring such failure to respond and the content of this letter to the attention of the court in relation to its costs.

 

I presume that all this is a frightening tactic and hoping that I retract my intentions.

 

Next Week I am due to issue a LBA to them .do I try and answer there questions or do I just go for it and issue the LBA then plan the CC papers

 

Any advice appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This seems like pretty standard stufff, have a read around in the Northern Rock sectino and you'll probably see that they send this letter to everyone. Don't answer their questions simply send your LBA and crack on.

Ex CAG helper ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

I need some advice?

 

Response from Northern rock on request for my money back asking for more information from me, Stalling tactic I guess.

 

So need to issue LBA but the opening line on this lter 'is that sorry that you have not resonded etc

 

Or do I go staright to the moneyclaim and start a claim or do i still issue the LBA but modify the opening paragraph about mention there response and the lack of a settlement??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Berry

Find Northen Rock under the "list of banks" linked below, make your self another thread, A V's thread in there as this is the Welcome section.

 

I notice you have many posts in teh Welcome section if you are finding problmes keeping track of your psost follow the tips below.

 

Good Luck

BL:)

If you are LOST in CAG

Click the Consumeractiongroup at the top left hand corner of this blue section on your screen.

This will show you a detailed Index of the forum.

 

Tracking your Claim Thread

Once you have located your bank and have made your thread, select thread tools at the top right of the thread, choose subscribe to thread, then select Yes.

 

To locate your Claim Threads

Just up from thread tools and to the left click Quick Links, this will offer subscribed threads. In here you will see your claims

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hi all

 

I have received a response from the Northern rock after I had sent the LBA letter.

It is too late anyway as it outside the 14 days as i have already started my moneyclaim.

 

however what they say is i do not have a leg to stand on????

 

See what you think

in summary

  1. Charges on current accounts are charges for services and are not DEFAULT charges or put it another way charges that arise due to breach of contract.
  2. in law for a clause to be deemed a penalty clause it has to operate due to a breach of contract
  3. the essence of a current account contract is the provision of current account services by a provider to the current account holder
  4. the charges made by the current account provider for those services go directly to the adequacy of the bargain between the current account holder and the currrent account provider and as such are a core term of the contract and
  5. Northern rock plc's current account charges are clearly and unambiguously stated at the outset and prior to the conclusion of the agreement between the customer and Northern Rock plc.
  6. The combined effects of points 1-5 above is that the current account charges are entirely lawful they are not 'unlawful penalty' and nor are they unfair or unenforeable.

you again make reference to the regime of fees applied to your account being 'unlawful at the common law,statute and recent consumer regulations' without identifying the common law,statute or consumer regulation or indeed the specific or regulations you seek to rely on.

 

They then go on a bit about looking for to my response to the above law,statute and regulations????:idea:

 

But in the event that proceedings are isued without your having provided a substantive response to the legal issues raised, Northern Rock plc reserves the right to bring such failure to respond and the content of these letters to the attention of the court in relation to its costs.:mad:

 

Are they trying to put me off??? Too late anyway:p :p

 

Any help would be appreciated although I have already started the moneyclaim on line, they have initially until the 17th december to respond

 

many thanks

 

BJB

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a feeling that MCOL is next to sue them in the courts for your money. Remember the fist two letters are making sure you give them ample time to respond. When you sue them you will be giving case law and it is for the courts to decide who is right which is errrrrmmm YOU

Good Luck

Just re read what you wrote so as you are already suing them so keep going

I came I saw I helped. I could do no more.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all

 

I have received a response from the Northern rock after I had sent the LBA letter.

It is too late anyway as it outside the 14 days as i have already started my moneyclaim.

 

however what they say is i do not have a leg to stand on????

 

See what you think

in summary

  1. Charges on current accounts are charges for services and are not DEFAULT charges or put it another way charges that arise due to breach of contract.
  2. in law for a clause to be deemed a penalty clause it has to operate due to a breach of contract
  3. the essence of a current account contract is the provision of current account services by a provider to the current account holder
  4. the charges made by the current account provider for those services go directly to the adequacy of the bargain between the current account holder and the currrent account provider and as such are a core term of the contract and
  5. Northern rock plc's current account charges are clearly and unambiguously stated at the outset and prior to the conclusion of the agreement between the customer and Northern Rock plc.
  6. The combined effects of points 1-5 above is that the current account charges are entirely lawful they are not 'unlawful penalty' and nor are they unfair or unenforeable.

you again make reference to the regime of fees applied to your account being 'unlawful at the common law,statute and recent consumer regulations' without identifying the common law,statute or consumer regulation or indeed the specific or regulations you seek to rely on.

 

They then go on a bit about looking for to my response to the above law,statute and regulations????:idea:

 

But in the event that proceedings are isued without your having provided a substantive response to the legal issues raised, Northern Rock plc reserves the right to bring such failure to respond and the content of these letters to the attention of the court in relation to its costs.:evil:

 

Are they trying to put me off??? Too late anyway:p :p

 

Any help would be appreciated although I have already started the moneyclaim on line, they have initially until the 17th december to respond

 

many thanks

 

BJB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BJ.

 

That letter is a standard response, churned out by computer.

It is designed and worded to try to intimidate you into dropping your claim.

Just stick to your own timetable and provided you follow, faithfully, the well-tried and tested procedures suggested on this site, YOU WILL WIN.

 

Good luck with your claim.

 

Regards, Rooster.

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Dear all

 

i need some help.

 

I followed all the steps and used the correct documents, filled in the money on line details, waited no response from the northern rock, after 14 days filled in the request to win my cliam by default. this all happened back on 19th December.

the court issued the 'award by deafult letter' to me and the northern rock.

 

I heard nothing, i thought it was just christmas, so i rang them up for my money, nicely of course.

Today I receive a letter from the Northern rock with a copy of an application Notice, in respect of an application to set aside judgement in default pursuant to part 13.3(a)(1)

 

apparently the court paperwork got lost in there system???

 

They want to defend they state' the defendant has a real prospect of sucessfully defending the claim'

 

They want a telephone conference??

 

Can they do this and what are my next steps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello

 

Recieved my new court date this morning 12 th Feb.

Northern rock PLC have asked the court to set aside there original default judgment, they feel they can defend my origianal argument??

 

Northern rock have files there defence papers but the court have not asked myself for any further information i.e court bundle, do i still prepare this in readiness??

 

will they actually defend??

 

Any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

No nothing at all I have rang the courts twice this week, wednesday and yesterday.

Yesterday they could not find my file so i have to ring back monday.

 

So the saga drags on and on.

 

but the NR will not respond until the court instructs them too. But they did declare that they would submit there defence within seven days of the instruction by the court.

 

so will wait and see

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

AQ complete and going in the post tonight.

 

Hope the judge follows the draft directions, I have started on the next phase so all my documents are ready and prepared when i here form the court next

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

A friend of mine is also at the same stage as you with the NR - They also did not respond to any of the court documents he sent, there reason, they were lost in the system!

 

They have also applied to have judgement set aside, and have had the cheek to ask my friend to consent to the set aside without a hearing!

 

The date of hearing is not until 2nd May though so he has a pretty long wait.

 

Good luck..keep us informed!

Link to post
Share on other sites

arkanara, can you link me to a thread for your friend as I have an idea to speed things up which may or may not work.;)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Caro,

 

He is not a member of the site, he has no computer access which is why I am helping him. It is my brother in law so I dont mind too much. I have started a thread in the A&L forum as I did not realise these threads were her until later.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester/73680-application-set-aside-judgement.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

All

 

My AQ had to be last monday, used the new directions to support the AQ.

spoke to the courts on friday they expect to present the AQ to the judge today so hopefully by the end of the week i might here something and see if the judge has followed the new directions.

the Cheque has been cashed today. so need to add that to the final bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

timeline northern rock

 

22nd dec 06 sar request

 

1st jan 07 letter 1 sent requesting 836.00 back

 

8th jan 07 looking in to it letter

 

11th jan 07 nasty reply one charges are legal so tough

 

20th jan 07 letter 2

 

31st jan telling me letter forwarded to legal dept

 

02nd feb 07 letter 3 before action

 

6th feb 07 nasty reply two

 

15th feb 07 issued moneyclaim online

 

16th feb acknowledged by northern rock

 

 

then nothing until this morning cheque thru post for £1016 with a covering letter spitting there dummy out (notwithstanding your abject failure to adress the legal issues raised in the previous letters,for reasons of commercial expediancy and without any admissions of guilt blah blah full settlement chq enclosed 1016.5)

 

 

many thanks for all the advice and dont buckle keep going till the end:-) :-) :-) :cool: :cool: :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Northern Rock's Address

 

Your address

 

Date

 

A/c no.

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Notwithstanding my abject failure to address the legal issues raised in the previous letters, I find it highly amusing that you EDIT rolled over and coughed up so easily.

 

I can only presume that you have realised that your EDIT has been rumbled and clearly havent the b@lls to attempt to face a judge.

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

 

 

rscottw

 

 

PS: Thanks for the return of my dosh and dont forget, I will always be delighted to humiliate you in court, should the opportunity arise in the future.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...