Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

can i still take on egg, even though i have a CCJ against me through them ?


Richard Thomas
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6600 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i got an egg credit card about 3 years ago, with a credit limit of £4000, i genuinley thought id only spent £2500, the repayments were that high i couldnt pay them, thus cut a long story short i now have a CCJ against me through them, can i still claim back against them ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Way to go....i had a letter from egg solicitor, i posted the DPA to him asked if he would pass it on to his client, as i had no luck with them responding to my letters in the past, have not heard a thing yet hehe.!!

 

I also pointed out i had PPP with them and that they had failed to pay out after an accident i had whilst on holiday. So i have given them plenty to think about.

 

Once you get a result, i would be inclined to ask for a lower repayment one you can afford, with capped amount owing and the ccj set aside. And all defaults to be removed. If they go along with this your credit history will improve as you will have a record of steady reguler payments and thats what credit companies look for. Long winded i know but should work in your favour at the end of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly they know these charges are unlawful, you need to do a few things here to get the debt collectors off your back. Write to them and tell them you dispute the actual amount owed and you are pursuing the repayment of unlawful

charges, and that you are going to write to the court to set judgement aside.

You can set judgement aside for serveral reason's, Include this copy of the letter to the court in with the debt collectors letter,

One reason is you accepted the full amount in the begining, and you have new information that you didnt have that you are now disputing some of the debt.

In other words you were not aware that the charges applied to your account were unlawful and that you could claim these back. Remember to keep copies of letters too.

I was in the same position Saturday and i spat venom down the phone to those nasty debt collectors because i now know about this site and the unlawful charges. I googled removal of ccjs and found out how to ask for judgement to be set aside. My letters went off this morning. Hope this is helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thank you very much for the advise. I will get the debt collectors off of my back first. Would you be so kind and show me the link that showed you how to set judgement aside?

 

I will need to find a reason to set judgement aside but I think that just saying new information has become available to me informing me that the charges are unlawful will suffice.

 

once again thank you for the help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 09 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6600 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...