Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Section 78 advice passed to another DCA


debtkiller
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6377 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone give me some advice about s78 please.

 

I am being chased by our freinds American Express, they have been VERY unhelpful and have in the past employed a lot of DCA's.

 

The last DCA they employed was VIL Collections. I sent them the s78 letter and £1 and got a fumled response from them but not what is required so I ignored them. At this time VIL were acting as agents for Amex. I did not send the s78 letter to American Express though (not even sure where to send it)

 

I have now had a letter from this forums old freind capquest sying that they have bought the debt but have had no letter of assignment, do they have to provide this? if so by when?

 

Do I have to now ask them for s78 and give them the 12 working days, or is the fact that another company did not supply what is needed mean that capquest can go and fall off the nearest cliff??

 

All help is greatfully received

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Capquest have now bought the debt, and own it then yes send the CCA request.

 

Dont worry that they have not executed the debt correctly, or provided the requested documents as it will be for them to explain why not IF it gets to court. and ultimately face hefty fines.

 

Let them dig their own hole, as they should be fully aware of their responsibilities by now....;)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

As Capquest have now bought the debt, and own it then yes send the CCA request.

 

Dont worry that they have not executed the debt correctly, or provided the requested documents as it will be for them to explain why not IF it gets to court. and ultimately face hefty fines.

 

Let them dig their own hole, as they should be fully aware of their responsibilities by now....;)

 

As turnaround said, let them dig their own hole.. Send a CCA request to them, that way if they default and sell the debt the buyer of the debt is also automaticallydeemed as defaulted....

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes agreed.

There have been lots of dealings with Capquest over the months.

In fact I had dealings with them myself and they soon backed off when I fired off the letters.

Dont be intimidated by them,in fact a search on here will throw up lots of stuff you may find interesting.

 

have a look at this too;

sorry on second thought I will pm it to you.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your help, but I'm still a bit confused. The CCA request was already sent to the last DCA VIL Collections who where acting as agents for Amex, this went into default. From what you are saying capquest is now automatically deemed in default as a result.

 

My dilema is if I send capquest the CCA request and (by miricles) they fulfill it and then want to take me to court the court will probably look favorably on them as THEY fulfilled their legal obligations, now if I do not send them the CCA request at all and say its in default, this could get messy if taken to court - can you see my dilema.

 

I also have another query about this - sigh!! Amex registered a default against me in 2004. As this is now owned by capquest - do capquest have control over removing the default? and reporting to the CRA's any payments, satisfaction etc? or is that still left with Amex who could not care less about it (out of their hands).

 

As usual all feedback is gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry that is not the case. The only company that can default under a CCA request is the owner of the debt... They are the only people that are abilged to provide you with info, copies of docs etc......

 

Their agentd don't have to provide anything....

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes, well pretty much all the time really, the agents acting for the debt owner, act as if they own it. While they may not be obliged to send you any documents they do very little to make sure the owner complies with the request either. In my experience I've come down hard on both the agent, the owner and the original creditor and told them all they are equally responsible. While the agent and the owner tend to bluster and continue harrassing and bully the original creditor, usually the high street bank with a "good name" takes action and calls these parasites off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that the debt has been sold from Amex to capquest does anyone know who can remove/update the original default issued by Amex??

 

Usually when a debt is assigned (sold) to a DCA the default gets changed into the name of the DCA

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...