Parking Eye ANPR LOC Now claimform - Teanlowe - Booths Poulton Le Fylde

[brassnecked]

Yes if there are two seperate PCN potentially 2 claims put each on e on the correct thread, so they are not mixed up.

[brassnecked]

They seem to have learned they cannot add anything to the original Invoice if chasing keeper at least.

[brassnecked]

Its the back of the Original PCN we need

[brassnecked]

As LFI says indicate they have another 2 weeks to give you the information or you will bring a Claim against them for failure to provide the requested data.  if you read Hitman's thread below they obtained a succesful CCJ against a fleecer for just that.  Would make PE look a bit silly if you did the same.

 

 

[brassnecked]

Having read through the PE missve that passes for a WS, I have to concur with FTMDave and DX  it initially is a ramble through Beavis taking it out of its contec=xt as many other fleecer's do, its not a universal automatic case winner at all, and can be used against a fleecer equally when they do that.  Seems that many judges are now awake to PPC shenanigans, and one reading that might lose the will to live after the big expansive ramble on beavis.

[brassnecked]

makes you wonder if they have even submitted it, its that bad

 

[brassnecked]

There we go, as was assumed another frightener, they would be stupid to actually submit that garbage.

[brassnecked]

 perhaps checking MCOL again for claim status might be an idea, they would be extremely silly to submit that guff as LFI has given an absolute dissection of their argument that would be excellent in a defence WS if they actually had.

[brassnecked]

Just read through your WS with Dave and Nicky Boy's suggestions it is superb, the arguments around timing accuracy and synchronisation will really puzzle them, so they might bail and pull the case if they don't want their camera system to be forensically examined as to connectivity and time stamps.  The PE WS was more like War and peace than a WS for a parking claim.

[brassnecked]

So somewhere near the beginning of WS use LFI#s points first as evidently are suing the wrong person, Keeper cannot be held liable POFA not followed.