Form k Restrictions on 2 different properties - one RE: HMRC Business vat CCJ 2012

[dx100uk]

she does not need to do anything.

the rest k's cannot harm her. 

all that should happen is the buyers sols write to the rest k holders simply saying the property has sold. though luck.

all that normally happens is it simply gets removed by land registry when they get informed of the successful sale/deeds update by the buyers sols

[dx100uk]

nothing, ignore.

no they can't

no, ......

 

once any property is SOLD the restriction k vanishes dead gone parrot.( it NEVER WAS ANY GOOD on a jointy owned property in the 1st place!!)

[dx100uk]

no they cant, a rest k is useless it is not security and cant be 'changed' to anything.

HMRC dont get CCJ's there no need too.

if you have an issue with an existing restriction k please type out the text for it from the deeds via the land registry site.gov only mind!! the others charge scam fees.

[dx100uk]

Ok ..

Well they didn't need to do that nor the rest k as HMRC debts don't expire. Weird 

So this isn't really about the sales, it's what HMRC want to do to get their £ of flesh 

What were these HMRC debts?

Dx

[dx100uk]

Debts for what to HMRC , it might be the key here  

But the fact is they won't get any money out of the sale via the rest k 

When were theses  ccj's and did she not attempt to defend them?

Dx

[dx100uk]

forget the divorce one, 

and im pretty sure the hmrc can't enforce a business vat debt further either.

but was she sole trader or ltd co.?

 

id just forget about them and sell and go start a new life,

t

[dx100uk]

ok thats explains why they went ccj route then

 

Fact Sheet - VAT | VAT debt | Business Debtline | Business Debtline

BUSINESSDEBTLINE.ORG

 

 

i dont think there much more they will want to do the ccj is +11yrs? old too.

 

read me

 

dx

 

[dx100uk]

scroll down to the CCJ section.

 

Fact Sheet - VAT | VAT debt | Business Debtline | Business Debtline

BUSINESSDEBTLINE.ORG

 

[dx100uk]

Read that arcticle

[dx100uk]

They got judgement 11yrs ago!! 

Can't do it again . The rest k dies with the sale. If they wanted the money they'd have done something in 12yrs.

 

IMHO she simply shuts up, they can't get blood out of a stone .

[dx100uk]

Well that arcticle says they can't use HMRC bailiffs as they could of used those in the 1st place without any court 

 

Something smells here and I think it means nothing more they can do nor they want to .

 

Dx

[dx100uk]

nothing ignore them.

 

dx

 

[dx100uk]

SD for who ? from who? about what?

 

[dx100uk]

to remind posters ,

.......................

the default CCJ was from 2010 and resulted in a CO/Restriction k - debt was from her divorce solicitors who totally saw her coming, we owned several properties,

my divorce bill was £2,000

hers was the order of 15k and rising.

.......................

im not too sure they can issue an SD - its an abuse of process? 

the default CCJ/rest k (now gone due to sale)  is 13yrs old - 

p'haps @Andyorch will clarify . 

[dx100uk]

brrr....working...brrrr...working....

so an SD can be issued as the security (the rest K) no longer exists....i think....

[dx100uk]

ah right so security still exist for this CCJ/CO now SD debt.

then i dont think they can go for an SD.

and as for interest, thats cheeky. but the CCJ no post judgemental int plays no part.

dx

 

 

[dx100uk]

cant force sale no and never could. 

if the ccj did not mention post judgemental interest then it cant be added. and a s the sun of the rest k has not changed, i dont think they can add interest on a statutory demand no. but anyway the security still exists on the debt (so they had a rest k on both properties?  i didnt ask this before) so sd cant be done too from what i understand. 

dx

 

[dx100uk]

an SD is not enforcement of a CCJ.

 

[dx100uk]

i dont think they can.

if a restriction still exists on her other property for the same debt.

is this true?

 

[dx100uk]

but does the existing rest k name her  like the one that was removed from the other sold property?

[dx100uk]

hope im right im sure @Andyorch will clarify further about if the SD is ok to be raised......

 

dx

 

 

[dx100uk]

[dx100uk]

for the same debt and in her name?

dx

[dx100uk]

On 22/07/2023 at 21:18, ohitsonlyme said:

Yes form k is in her name for both creditors and still live on unsold property 2

is this correct?

 

 

[dx100uk]

11 hours ago, Andyorch said:

If the restrictions are still in place they cannot issue a SD as the existing CCJ/s acts as security.

so the above applies.