Jump to content


Virgin, mystery extra line: 2 judgments for Data Protection breaches - so far!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 671 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On 10/07/2021 at 16:47, BankFodder said:

The other side may well want to have evidence that you have suffered in some way physically – maybe you had to go to the doctor or you have been unable to work et cetera and that your damages for distress should follow on from that physical injury.
This used to be the rule but then there was the case a few years ago – Google against somebody and there the court held that the data protection statute should be read to mean that damages were available for pure distress without any evidence of any other physical injury or damage. You will have to look it up and find the name of the case.


Google v Vidal-Hall

 

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/google-v-vidal-hall-judgment.pdf

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...