Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Smear tests new test on horizon


SHIRLI
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3548 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

academics at barts and London school of medicine have found that urine tests identify the presence of h.p.v were 87% accurate whilst not being as accurate as the smear test it could be improved. 1 in 5 women fail to turn up for smear test because of the intrusive nature of this test.

good news for 1 in 5 of us. ABOUT TIME

Link to post
Share on other sites

academics at barts and London school of medicine have found that urine tests identify the presence of h.p.v were 87% accurate whilst not being as accurate as the smear test it could be improved. 1 in 5 women fail to turn up for smear test because of the intrusive nature of this test.

good news for 1 in 5 of us. ABOUT TIME

 

Not all cervical cancer is due to HPV's : does their test do anything to protect against this?

 

HPV infection is common in sexually active women aged under 25. It is rare for these to cause cervical cancer in this age group. What do you propose to prevent false positive tests, unnecessary anxiety, "swamping" of colposcopy clinics (by 'the worried well') and the consequent increase in miscarriage rates from unnecessary cervical biopsies?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me too, Leigh. It isn't particularly pleasant, but I'm sure that treatment for cervical cancer is much more difficult.

 

I would always prefer to be diagnosed early and treated than leave it too late and face the consequences.

 

HB

 

Exactly HB , im high risk both my mum and aunt died from cervical cancer and both uncles have had bowel cancer, I have never missed going for mine I cant take the risk.

Yes its unpleasant but for a few minutes I dont care if it saves my life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly HB , im high risk both my mum and aunt died from cervical cancer and both uncles have had bowel cancer, I have never missed going for mine I cant take the risk.

Yes its unpleasant but for a few minutes I dont care if it saves my life.

 

I agree completely and I'm very sorry about your relatives. It's only a couple of minutes as you say, and the nurse doing this has done hundreds or thousands of smear tests. It may seem intrusive to me or you, but it's routine for them and they've seen it all before. They don't look at it the same way.

 

I just want to be safe, as I think you do. :)

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree completely and I'm very sorry about your relatives. It's only a couple of minutes as you say, and the nurse doing this has done hundreds or thousands of smear tests. It may seem intrusive to me or you, but it's routine for them and they've seen it all before. They don't look at it the same way.

 

I just want to be safe, as I think you do. :)

 

HB

 

Thankyou HB,

Well after having four kids I dont find much embarressing so a smear test is easy for me to do bit I do understand that for some they find it awkward but as I have said never have and never will miss my test I want to be able to see my grandkids ( none yet tho ) grow up

Unlike my mum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 9th Septmber, ITV's This Morning ran a feature on the subject of the Smear Test. Dr Dawn Harper had the procedure done on live TV and seemed very relaxed through the process.

 

http://www.itv.com/thismorning/health/what-really-happens-during-smear-test-dr-dawn-harper

 

They also showed the improved plastic speculum and smear brush that are designed to make the process better.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 in 5 women do not go for smear tests because of it intrusive nature, 20% is a high number this urine test is not perfect but it is a start and when it is perfected it will cover all all virus leading to cervical cancer according to the british medical journal.

this morning program on i.t.v wheel out the smear test every year trying to tell us this is really quite a simple test with a couple of familiar faces volunteering to have the test on tv this is how concerned the medical is about the negative views on the smear test trying to persuade women.

I am happy 80% of women are happy to have the smear test

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 in 5 women do not go for smear tests because of it intrusive nature, 20% is a high number this urine test is not perfect but it is a start and when it is perfected it will cover all all virus leading to cervical cancer according to the british medical journal.

this morning program on i.t.v wheel out the smear test every year trying to tell us this is really quite a simple test with a couple of familiar faces volunteering to have the test on tv this is how concerned the medical is about the negative views on the smear test trying to persuade women.

I am happy 80% of women are happy to have the smear test

 

SHIRLI / ALIGRUBS/ (whichever log-in that parrots the same info, with the same posting style, and the same [common & unusual] grammatical errors) :

Which part of which BMJ article says "when it is perfected it will cover all all virus leading to cervical cancer" (since you note this "according to the british medical journal")

 

I've actually read the recent source articles (rather than just the press's interpretation of them) and can't see where they say that....

I might have missed that bit, and since you have quoted it ... no doubt you'll be able to point it out (since I'm sure you actually read the article(s) and wouldn't just make it up as you are going along, or blindly believe some journalist who can't interpret what the article actually says......)

 

However : they do say ......

"In cervical cancer screening, patient important outcomes are cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or invasive cancer. We were unable to consider these in our meta-analysis as too few studies reported adequate data."

(Quoted from the recent paper by Pathak)

 

The authors expand on this by noting "In the case of cervical cancer screening, patient important outcomes that must be considered include acceptability of testing, prediction of CIN or invasive cancer, management of positive test results, and safe intervals for testing between negative test results. Although acceptability of urine HPV testing has already been shown in published literature, the remaining outcomes have not."

 

How do you know the urine test affects CIN and/or cervical cancer rates?

 

No one yet knows how long to wait before retesting after a negative test, or what to do with a positive result.

(Do all positives need colposcopy? If a smear test was an issue for the woman, how are they going to react to the suggestion of a colposcopy??)

 

These questions arise naturally from reading the source paper. I came up with them myself, although I then found them summarised in the editorial by Kitchener : "urine samples have not been evaluated for the outcome that matters most—the detection of CIN"!

 

So, you are advocating a test merely because it is more acceptable, but without knowing it actually protects those tested? Or knowing what to do with a positive result?

 

+ve result : they don't know what to do with the result ... Do they need a colposcopy? A smear (after all)?

 

negative result : how long is safe before a retest? How many women will be falsely reassured by a "negative test" & go on to get cervical cancer (either from HPV 16 or 18, from a different HPV, or from a non-HPV cause).

 

When it is known the urinary testing is adequate & safe, then it should be offered to the 20%, and the 80% : with the information regarding the benefits and downsides of each - to allow them to make their informed choice. Until then : it is a work in progress.

 

You shouldn't let your dislike of smears allow you to put women's health at risk by suggesting a test you can't yet know protects women.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 in 5 women do not go for smear tests because of it intrusive nature, 20% is a high number this urine test is not perfect but it is a start and when it is perfected it will cover all all virus leading to cervical cancer according to the british medical journal.

this morning program on i.t.v wheel out the smear test every year trying to tell us this is really quite a simple test with a couple of familiar faces volunteering to have the test on tv this is how concerned the medical is about the negative views on the smear test trying to persuade women.

I am happy 80% of women are happy to have the smear test

 

 

GOOD AFTERNOON aligrubs

you are wrong 80% of women are not happy to go for a smear test they just have no choise .

this morning on i.t.v are trying to say this test is easy.

I think it is wrong to lure women who have never had a smear test by using well known women trying to tell them it is nothing. the very nature of the test puts women in a position likely to be abused by a sadistic cruel nurse. all effort should be put into finding a test as good and accurate as a smear test

Link to post
Share on other sites

GOOD AFTERNOON aligrubs

you are wrong 80% of women are not happy to go for a smear test they just have no choise .

this morning on i.t.v are trying to say this test is easy.

I think it is wrong to lure women who have never had a smear test by using well known women trying to tell them it is nothing. the very nature of the test puts women in a position likely to be abused by a sadistic cruel nurse. all effort should be put into finding a test as good and accurate as a smear test

 

 

 

 

 

 

I thought it was just me who thought the smear test was an horrific experience I am all for anything that replaces the test way we women are expected to endure

Link to post
Share on other sites

GOOD AFTERNOON aligrubs

you are wrong 80% of women are not happy to go for a smear test they just have no choise .

this morning on i.t.v are trying to say this test is easy.

I think it is wrong to lure women who have never had a smear test by using well known women trying to tell them it is nothing. the very nature of the test puts women in a position likely to be abused by a sadistic cruel nurse. all effort should be put into finding a test as good and accurate as a smear test

 

Hi Shirli.

 

I'm a bit confused by what you say. We have what we have as things are, and as I've already said, I would rather go through a few minutes of indignity with a smear test to stand a chance of being diagnosed and cured early on.

 

I'm sorry that your first smear test offended you, but have you ever had a baby or undergone treatment for cervical cancer like friends of mine? I have been told that the last two are a lot worse.

 

I'm sure efforts are being put into finding an alternative test, but for now my view is that we accept what there is because it seems to enable a diagnosis and in the meantime we hope for something like a urine test that will be equally effective. It's up to you whether you attend future smear tests or not, but then you need to accept the consequences if something is not picked up at an early stage.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought it was just me who thought the smear test was an horrific experience I am all for anything that replaces the test way we women are expected to endure

GOOD EVENING HELENA

you are not alone most women are either too afraid to complain or just think they have to put up with anything the n.h.s tell them, we must make our voices heard until they find a more civilised way to detect virus's that cause cervical cancer

 

Hi Shirli.

 

I'm a bit confused by what you say. We have what we have as things are, and as I've already said, I would rather go through a few minutes of indignity with a smear test to stand a chance of being diagnosed and cured early on.

 

I'm sorry that your first smear test offended you, but have you ever had a baby or undergone treatment for cervical cancer like friends of mine? I have been told that the last two are a lot worse.

 

I'm sure efforts are being put into finding an alternative test, but for now my view is that we accept what there is because it seems to enable a diagnosis and in the meantime we hope for something like a urine test that will be equally effective. It's up to you whether you attend future smear tests or not, but then you need to accept the consequences if something is not picked up at an early stage.

 

HB

GOOD EVENING honeybee

I have had many smear tests in my life both here in the uk and abroad whilst I have found them very unpleasant and felt and at the mercy of the nurse I continued with them, the last one I had here in Bournemouth at my doctor's surgery was torture the nurse assaulted me during the test. physically I was immobilised and could not defend myself. it is the nurses word against mine.you are right it is up to me whether i trust anyone ever to do the smear test on me. whilst i am afraid of having cervical cancer in the future i will never allow anyone to put me in that position again

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am closing this thread. It is an extension of a thread that was closed some time ago.

 

If you want to start a campaign in respect of changing the system from what it is - then I would suggest you do this using the Government campaign website. You can then post an e-campaign link on our forum.

 

Please do not attempt to resurrect this subject in another thread.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3548 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...