Jump to content


lowell and fredricksons chasing returned car finance from 2003


jimmid
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3785 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a very old debt with black horse for a car loan (started 4/11/2003)

 

shortly after I had money Problems and BH suggested taking car back and selling it to clear most of the debt.

 

I have not spoken or witten to them since 2005,

 

yet this year I recieved a letter from lowells saying they owned the debt and put a default notice on my CR on19/8/2010.

 

I have ignored them and have now recieved a letter before action from Fredricksons dated 23/01/2014.

 

I have not spoken or acknowledged this debt for at least8+ years,

 

can anyone advise what I should do or not do please. (Q. SB maybe)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes if more than 6 years has passed since any debt would have been incurred on the defaulted loan, then send the statute barred letter by recorded delivery. I say recorded because the letter before action is normal a signal that a court claim may follow.

 

I would also question the actual default date that has been put on your credit record. Perhaps you should also make a complaint to the Data Protection Officer at Lowells if the default information they have posted is wrong. If you handed the car back in 2005, they should have sold the car within say a maximum of 6 months and by now any default information should no longer be on your credit record.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, thanks for prompt reply....

 

..just to check,

 

the car was sold within 3 months and

 

I argeed then to pay £10 per month.

 

I stopped paying in early 2005 and although recieved letters,

I never contacted them again.

 

its only when 3 months before debt would have been 6 years old

lowell put the default on my CR.

and now threaten me with court costs, sol. fees,etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

usual trick for BH to pull.

 

they allowed you to VS the vehicle

rather that doing a VT

 

sadly VS exposes you to the full agreement payback

and the car being sold [supposedly] fpr a fraction of its worth

 

the real truth is it get sold via credit to someone else on a new deal

and they get paid twice

 

get an sar off to BH.

 

even though it 'appears' the debt is SB'd

it prob is not

as if BH did not default the loan and terminated it

it will still be live

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

usual trick for BH to pull.

 

they allowed you to VS the vehicle

rather that doing a VT

 

sadly VS exposes you to the full agreement payback

and the car being sold [supposedly] fpr a fraction of its worth

 

the real truth is it get sold via credit to someone else on a new deal

and they get paid twice

 

get an sar off to BH.

 

even though it 'appears' the debt is SB'd

it prob is not

as if BH did not default the loan and terminated it

it will still be live

 

dx

 

I think the agreement would have to be terminated on the return of the vehicle, the accrual of COA would be reset by any subsequent payment of the defaulted balance.

 

I would work on the assumption that the last payment represented the start of the clock in this instance.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

as said.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as said.

 

dx

 

?

 

I am inclined to agree that in this case the date of last payment will be the start of the limitations clock.

 

My reasoning is, when they accepted the car back and sold it they accepted that the contract was over. The issue of the default notice is a red herring although it would be needed for court action.

 

This is why statute barred is so very complicated and there is no one size fits all

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

none

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...