Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Swift Advances - Where to start?


Chrysalliss
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3690 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I am looking for some basic information at this stage about how to handle swift finances. I don't have the exact figures in front of me but here is the background.

 

About 8 years ago I was very stupid and ran up a lot of unsecured debts. In my wisdom I decided to get a secure loan to clear these and this is what lead me to a deal with Swift Advances in the first place.

 

I struggled for years to make the payments till 2 years ago I was made redundant. I was off work for just under a year and fell very behind both with Swift and my main mortgage company. This all came to a head last November when my main mortgage company applied for a repossession hearing. I had at this time just started back at work, I attended court and succesfuly got a suspended possession order and have made every payment since. This feels under control.

 

At the same time, I was in a similar position with Swift. My original fixed payment to Swift was £505 a month. I explained to them my situation and since last November have made payments of £550 a month, so I am meeting my monthly obligations and clearing the arrears slightly. However, because of some £18,000 of charges Swift have added, the interest now means that Swift need a payment of £814 a month to keep the account in the clear. I can't meet this. Every 2 weeks at the moment Swift ring me and we discuss the account and go round in circles. For the past 2 months they are putting a lot of pressure on me to sell the property as they claim it's in my "best interests". The phone call today told me they'd have a valuation done and advise me to sell sooner rather than later, except their valuation is some £50k less than an independent one I had done last month out of interest.

Now, I have no intention of selling my home at the moment. It's my home. I have fought long and hard these past 3 years to get myself back on my feet and I think I'm starting to win. But the pressure from Swift is becoming and increasing burden and I'm actually starting to feel very frightened.

 

I am aware that discussing this with them on the phone may no longer be my best course of action. At the moment I have a month by month agreement with them for the £550 but today the girl that rang said they were unlikely to accept this any further and they refuse to discuss further options with me till I speak to my citizens advice bureau "who will likely advise me to sell also"???

 

What is my best action here, I want to keep paying as much as I can every month to clear the loan and it seems preposterous that the reason the loan is now so high is their so called charges. What written letters would be best to send at this point? Is the CAB likely to be able to help at all for either side? And I have seen others here recommend complaining to my MP? Is that a wise plan?

 

Any advice gladly received.. I feel like I don't know where to start to fight this but I am totally ready for a fight!

 

Thanks for reading!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

The CAB could be useful, as would Shelter: 0808 800 4444.

 

You should certainly look to reclaim all of the charges that they have added to the debt. If you're unsure on how to do this we can help.

I think it would be REALLY important to make a Subject Access Request under the DPA '98; this will cost £10 but they will have a legal obligation to supply you with the account information going back at least 6 years.

 

How much did you borrow originally?

 

For the record, the CAB will only tell you to sell if it is your only legitimate option.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Hi - new to the forum.

 

I also was in a similar situation with Swift advances. Long story short, they agreed a loan with my mother who was not working at the time. House had to be sold and a £60k fee needed to be paid.

 

I believe the loan was misold, is there any official way of making a claim against these people?

 

Thanks in advance and Happy New Year

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Evening all.

I was about a day away from being repossessed by Swift back in 2005. As a result I had to remortgage, and lost £28k in equity (which was massively more than I borrowed).

I would very much like to reclaim something, although I do not expect to get anything like what I lost back.

To be honest, I would just be happy to become a thorn in their side for a bit.

Is 2005 too far back for me to start digging things back up?

It's also worth noting that Swift do not sell property's to reclaim their debt, they retain them. Absolute ****.

I did read that there was a change in the law back in 2005 which means that their practices are being outlawed?

Could this be applied retrospectively?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - new to the forum.

 

I also was in a similar situation with Swift advances. Long story short, they agreed a loan with my mother who was not working at the time. House had to be sold and a £60k fee needed to be paid.

 

I believe the loan was misold, is there any official way of making a claim against these people?

 

Thanks in advance and Happy New Year

 

This may be useful http://www.which.co.uk/consumer-rights/problem/i-think-ive-been-mis-sold-my-mortgage-what-can-i-do

 

FCA ref http://www.fca.org.uk/firms/firm-types/mortgage-brokers-and-home-finance-lenders/mcobs/scope-of-regulation click on the Q1 and Q2 for reply to question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi all I stupidly took a secured loan out 7 years ago with Swift advance for £8000.00 got into difficulty 4yrs ago due to serious illness which I informed them off so the payments were reduced from £140.08 to £100 per mouth never missed any of these payments only today I find out I have only actually paid of £285.12 of the loan and still owe £7714.88 which I find outrageous I can only presume that I have had a lot of charges applied to my account I am waiting now for my statements to be sent out to me Swift Advances are no better than loan sharks and all these pay day money lending company's and need to made accountable for their corrupt way of selling loans I have read some of the stories on here and I am shocked and horrified that the lengths this company will go to to get money out of people can we not go to the newspapers or somebody about them as they have to be stopped

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all I stupidly took a secured loan out 7 years ago with Swift advance for £8000.00 got into difficulty 4yrs ago due to serious illness which I informed them off so the payments were reduced from £140.08 to £100 per mouth never missed any of these payments only today I find out I have only actually paid of £285.12 of the loan and still owe £7714.88 which I find outrageous I can only presume that I have had a lot of charges applied to my account I am waiting now for my statements to be sent out to me Swift Advances are no better than loan sharks and all these pay day money lending company's and need to made accountable for their corrupt way of selling loans I have read some of the stories on here and I am shocked and horrified that the lengths this company will go to to get money out of people can we not go to the newspapers or somebody about them as they have to be stopped

 

Hi Pejero,

 

Yes you are right, it's a scandal. These loans were sold as being 'helpful' even being endorsed by familiar faces on TV, one a well known mathematician. I presume they were duped as well. Thankfully, that advertising has ceased as far as I can see and I hear Swift are not selling these loans now so that says it all really. PayDay and others alike are being tackled and the next to bring into the fold should be this sector. You may have seen this in another thread but if not an interesting read all be it some time back

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/7034187.stm

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/7037933.stm

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/7034492.stm

 

There is a lot of interest but it's not apparent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...