Jump to content


employment tribunals perjury and slander


iconoclash
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3885 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

if the respondent submits false allegations, everything from theft, drug use, violence etc., in the desperate attempt to defame the whistle-blower, can they be sued in turn for making defamatory claims and committing perjury, hearing goes public shortly??

Edited by iconoclash
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Statements made in the course of court and Tribunal proceedings are privileged, which means you cannot use them to bring a slander or defamation claim.It might be perjury, although whether the CPS would pursue this would depend on the circumstances. In any event you would need to wait until after the hearing.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Statements made in the course of court and Tribunal proceedings are privileged, which means you cannot use them to bring a slander or defamation claim.It might be perjury, although whether the CPS would pursue this would depend on the circumstances. In any event you would need to wait until after the hearing.

hi and thaks. so as the case mangement orders talk about witness statement to be read at the hearing, which is public, then all that information will be public i assume. what about bringing a private civil case against such abuse? any thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ET hearings are public in the sense that anyone can go in and listen, but in reality it is unlikely that anyone will be interested. ETs hear all sorts of cases every day, unless the case involves a famous person its unlikely anything will get recorded or published.

 

A private civil case is not possible since statements made in court/Tribunal proceedings are privileged and cannot be the subject of a defamation claim. In theory I guess you could start a contempt of court action through the courts but this is generally not advisable except in the most extreme circumstances.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...