Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mackenzie Hall offering discount on QQ debt - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3909 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everybody thanks in advance for help

 

I have various debts all of which i am paying a small amount a month to (accepted by creditors)

 

I have however had no joy communicating with Mackenzie Hall who have bought my Quick Quid debt. I originally sent them letters to stop phone calls which have now resumed after a break, and they are constantly sending me completely irrelevant letters.

 

However today i have received a letter headed

 

REDUCED SETTLEMENT OFFER

 

Our offer of full and final settlement : £149.40

to be paid no later than noon 18th August 2013

 

 

 

Now the original borrowed amount from quickquid way back in Jan 2012 was £200 (£237.50 total to be paid back)

 

I lost my job very shortly after this and everything spiraled from there. Quick quid literally ignored me for months (i was not hiding as stated above rest have agreements) and Mackenzie Hall just constantly rejected my £5 per month offer.

 

I am wondering why today they have sent this as on paper it looks a fair reduction?

 

Thanks for any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You need to send them a letter, go to the template library copy and paste the document and adjust the wording with regard to your circumstances send it to the D.C.A concerned with a £1.00 Postal Order. Mackenzie Hall

must send you the information concerning the alleged debt you have with them. I am not to sure How long they have to to reply (I am sure someone knows reading this) .If they do not reply or more likely reply and do not give you the information requested . Then come back onto the site and report. If they are offering a reduced settlement offer then normally it means that the debt is unenforceable by the courts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, deepinthedoo,

heres the format of the letter

Dear Sir or Madam

 

Re:− Account/Reference Number xxxxxxxxx

 

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit, which is 12 working days. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77 will apply.

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection From Unfair Tradingicon Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

I hope this helps you more

Link to post
Share on other sites

Deepinthedoo Mackenzie Hall may have no right in law to collect the debt, also you do not know the make up of the debt, have illegal charges been made? They must prove the that they own the debt. Yes make the Postal Order payable to Mackenzie Hall.

Edited by mr_mastiff
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Deepinthedoo, just a quick question did Quick Quid inform you at any time that the loan had been reassigned to Mackenzie Hall, or sold etc. Also you stated that you had sent them a letter to stop phone calls. Diid they respond to this letter. If they keep ringing you then please keep a record because a complaint to the ICO may be in order. I have only a small amount of experience in writing to the ICO but I am sure that with help we can find a template letter of one of the more experience members of CAG will lend a Hand.

Edited by mr_mastiff
more questions to ask
Link to post
Share on other sites

i complained to the local trading standards very early on and the contact stopped

 

They are now leaving voicemails (automated) on my home phone

 

i have to be completely honest i dont use my home phone so it does not bother me that much (they did contact my previous work before which sparked my anger)

 

I do not believe qq ever informed me but i could be wrong had a hell of a lot of paperwork at that time

Link to post
Share on other sites

Deepinthedoo, complain to your local trading standards again, if you take the complaint further i.e to ICO etc it gives more weight also in the letter add that you have complained again to trading standards about them harassing you by phone. Also you can make a complaint to Mackenzie Hall,s compliance officerI am sure there is a format letter somewhere that you could adapt. I,ll have a look and get back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...