Adverts warn of passive smoking risk

[eddie1234567]

But I've already done that test, 60 per day for more years than you have lived and I'm still here so science can't always be that accurate, it relies a lot on good guesses as well.

 

Good for you, a sample of 1, put you next to my grandfather and my aunty, both smokers work environment, both died of smoking related diseases, one a smoker one a Barmaid non smoker, I am sure someone somewhere is going wow at the statistical significance of your test

 

I think on smoking, science is very accurate, started with good guesses that smokers seemed to die, they then came behind and said how

 

(edited: fingers going to fast missing words)

[Conniff]

I hope you realise that all I'm saying is tongue in cheek stuff although I do believe most of what they say is bunk for the simple reason they come out with so many facts and figures and then further down the line they are refuted and shown to be off the truth, like that nutter giving mis-information about the MMR jab.

[InformedSearcher]

This is simple - ask the NHS to show you the data to show their results! They will direct you to a website that shows simply results.Ask them to show you how they got their data, as in raw surveys and they cannot do it. In reality ALL things like road vehicles, Diesel trains, planes and ships will have to stop because they emit more dangerous fumes that some person having a smoke (whatever they are smoking).Kind of puts paid to 'Ramadan' too!

Michael