Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Natwest credit card PPI reclaim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4058 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I need some help with a current PPI claim I have through Natwest credit cards. In February 2013 I decided to check on a credit card ( which had defaulted payments) to see if I had ppi. I am currently making monthly payments to an external company who have acquired the debt, and pay based on personal circumstance.

 

Today I have recieved a letter from the financial ombusment, who have made me a offer with no exact figures of how much ppi I paid as the bank is not admiting liability. This letter also states thy f I have any outstanding debts with the company I will not recieve my claim as it will pay off the outstanding debts.

 

So a few questions;

 

Is there a way around this? I.e should I go to an external company? As I did have the ppi and I wouldn't have gone I to areas if I had of known it was on the card because I could have used it.

 

Should I accept this offer, with no details of how much I paid? Can I make sure the pay me and not Natwest.

 

 

Thanks

X

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The normal process would be that fos will instruct the lender to make an offer to you and it is they who should set out the amount of that offer. Do not accept any offer which has not been quantified to you.

 

It is not the fos who will be making payment...it will be the lender.

 

You say that an external company is collecting on this. Has the debt been sold to them or are they collecting on behalf of the original creditor?

 

If the debt has been sold then there can be no set off against it. If you have other debts with the same banking group then they will be allowed to set your PPI refund against other debts but only to the extent of notified arrears.

 

If you have other debts with the same group and the accounts have been terminated then set-off is allowed.

 

If none of that applies then the refund must come to you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for your response. I have just called the collections company (Newman & co) who are now working as Transcom?and after a sheepish hesitation and two minute hold the gentleman told me that they are working on behalf of natwest. Should I trust this response?

How would I go about asking for accurate figures so I can understand if a settlement figure given to me is correct?

 

 

I do greatly appreciate your help

 

Thankyou x

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can check your credit file to see who is listed as the owner of the debt.

 

Did you receive a notice of assignment. If not then the Original Credit still owns the account and they will be able to set off.

 

The lender should make you a written offer detailing the premiums paid and the interest awarded.

 

To check it you would need all of the account statements.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...