Jump to content


Reclaim credit card charges more than six years old


cavern
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3640 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

I was told that I can reclaim £18 and £15 Late Payment and Over Limit charges on my old Natwest Credit Card account from more than six years ago.

 

Natwest say that because the charges are so old I cannot claim as the Limitation Act prevents it. However a friend says that as I didn't learn about reclaiming these Natwest charges until 2011, Section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980 could entitle me to claim;

 

“the period of limitation shall not begin to run until the plaintiff has discovered the fraud, concealment or mistake (as the case may be) or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it.”

 

In that respect I paid the charges mistakenly thinking they were lawful, the bank deliberately concealed their true nature. It was a random conversation in 2011 that led to my being alerted to the possibility of reclaiming.

 

I still have statements from 2000-2003 showing the individual charges which total approx £250 when you include 8% flat court rate interest.

 

The correspondence so far:

 

August 2011 - I sent in the claim. Natwest replied “you have no valid claim as the OFT confirmed the timescale is a maximum six years. ……..as the account was closed more than six years ago we no longer hold information on the account”.

 

Sept 8 2011 - I quoted section 32 of the Limitation Act and enclosed copies of the statements showing all the charges.

 

Sept 2011 - Natwest reply "unfortunately you are only able to claim back charges dating back six years; these time periods are limited by law. This includes late payment and 'over the limit' fees".

 

Aug 13 2012 - I read some forums then wrote to Natwest re-stating section 32 of the Limitation Act.

 

Aug 21 2012 - Natwest reply, "thank you for contacting us again with your complaint. We are unable to address your claim for a refund as the account has been closed for more than six years. We therefore no longer hold any information on file. The 6 year time period to which you refer applies to the length of time we are obligated to hold on to a customers information for. As this time period has elapsed we no longer have this information.

For the purposes of the FOS this letter may be considered as the Bank's Final Response."

 

Natwest's seem to have dropped their time-limit objection. They claim they no longer have the information but this is not true as I sent them copies of the statements in September 2011.

 

Please can I have some advice on my options now to pursue the matter. Should complain to the FOS, send Natwest a Letter Before Action or something else? Also can I claim contractual interest rather than a flat 8%?

 

Thanks in advance for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have the information, then I dont see what their problem is !!

 

I am sure someone with more knowledge will pop in and advise soon :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm..

 

if you are going to court

 

you claim int in restitution

 

with 8% stat ON TOP>

 

lots more than £250!! for charges of that age.

 

This second spreadsheet is a compound interest calculator and can be used both for PPI claims and Charges Reclaims on Revolving Credit Accounts such as credit cards. Compound interest is not an award that foslink3.gif will give in respect of PPI claims but it can be used in PPI cases that are pursued through the courts. It is the standard sheet that is also used for charges reclaims both on credit cards and loan accounts where interest in restitutionlink3.gif is claimed.

 

CISheet v101.xls

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is very important that you are clear it is section 32c.

You will be relying on mistake as opposed to concealment or fraud since these are near impossible to prove.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the input.

 

Now I undertstand that as a result of Natwest's mistakes over the charges I should claim restitution as compound interest with the flat 8% court rate on top. I read the interest tutorial and have some queries.

Please can someone explain how to calculate compound interest on charges from 2000-2002 when I only have Natwest's credit card interest rates for those years. Does anyone know how to get hold of the rates for the last ten years? Without it I cannot see it is possible to calculate accurately.

 

Secondly, how is the 8% flat interest calculated. Yearly on top of the compound interest calculation or another way?

 

Lastly, If Natwest refuse my claim, I want to be sure my Particulars of Claim for the court are as watertight as possible. I cannot find a sample POC for credit card charges reclaiming on here but perhaps I haven't looked hard enough. Please could someone help with this?

 

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

avg out the int that you know use - that.

 

you cant claim int in rest & stat.

 

just fill out the spready i sent

 

it does it for you.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sample poc is in shelleys barclays thread in the bc success forum.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

bump this went quiet....

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

user not been here since aug 2012

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...