Kevboy_telford Vs LLoyds

[zomerzet]

Goodluck Kevboy

[Guest bong]

Has anyone noticed that in the case of Tom Brennan V NatWest - which is proceeding today - Natwest is claiming that the case is about Breach of Contract.

 

This happens to suit them because Tom is claiming the charges amount to a tort so that he can pursue a claim for exemplary damages, whereas these damages are not recoverable in contract.

[indebtstudent]

The suspense is killing me (how selfish!!!)

[sabrina1041]

Good luck Kevboy, kkep strong and don't let the Bs get you down

[BarclaysHater77]

Just to let you all know my bank have told me i am getting a letter by end of the week with full final settlement for £3200 so dont dispair they are still paying up before court

[TANZARELLI]

Just to let you all know my bank have told me i am getting a letter by end of the week with full final settlement for £3200 so dont dispair they are still paying up before court

CONGRATS

[indebtstudent]

So I guess there is no appeal?

[carter56]

how you doing kev ? hope things arent getting you down and that work is being done off site. keep going and i am sure it will all come good

linda

[monopoly23]

Isn't the 14 days for an appeal up tomorrow? Does anyone know what's happening with this?

[TANZARELLI]

I'm sure he will post when he is good and ready folks.

 

Not sure on the deadline, but I am sure that he is egtting some good support now, its just a shame he didn't seem to get it before.

 

Good luck in whatever you decide Kev.

 

Tanz

[Mistermind]

see 6 links in

Sticky: Lloyds victory in Birmingham - in perspective (Last Page post #181)

[archer_66]

well lets wait and see then what happens was the other man rudd from CAG does anyone know?

[dommcd]

Havent Been On Here For A While But Heard About The Case And Had To See What The "good Guys" Thought About It. Im About To Send Off Some Peliminary Letters Am Still Very Confident In The End Results. Shame There Was No Appeal But I Suppose He Got The Best Advice And Made The Right Decision Based On Said Advice.

 

Had A Quick Look Through The Ruling (or Whatever Its Called) On The Case And Had To Laugh At Point 33.

Because A Customer Doesnt Get Charged For The Automatic Doors Opening For Him At His/her Local Branch, He/she Should Be Happy To Pay Penalty Charges. (maybe Thats A Little Pedantic)

 

An I Cant Believe A Judge Made Reference To Digging A Whole To Hide Money. Ive Heard They Are Out Of Touch But But I Didnt Realise It Was Measured In Millenia Lol. (mind You Most People Would Probabally Find That Preferable Considering The Way Banks Behave Themselves These Days)

 

I Mean Thank God The Banks Dont Charge For The Things That Banks Are There For In The First Place, Shouldnt We Be Greatful! I Bought A Car Recently And Was So Thankful That It Came With Wheels And At No Extra Cost! The Munafacturer Must Have Been Paying Attention To The Actions Of Those Generous Banks Lol.

 

I'll Stop Now

[Kevboy_telford]

Dommcd - hear hear (just not sure about 'propering' each word!)

 

I am still here, at present am keeping a low profile as several things are still in the air. When everything has been worked out / decided I WILL let you know.

 

Everybody keep up the fight - especially those with the hull case going on.

 

Just remember there is always more than one way to skin any cat

[TECHSPEC]

I did read your were going to the FOS:-

 

New Bank Charges £100,000 Fighting Fund & Legal News - MoneySavingExpert.com Forums

 

But on the FOS site it states:-

 

" If you decide to go to court instead, you should be aware that if you lose you will not then be able to bring your complaint to us"

 

I know you are keeping your cards close to your chest, so don't feel obligated to clarify it, but i am a bit confused now.

 

But with them bankers reading these threads, maybe thats the way it needs to be

[remus]

"We understand that the ombudsman has discretionary jurisdiction to adjudicate on financial complaints from consumers after legal proceedings have been issued".

The above is a bit further down on the post.

All hope is not yet lost:)

[dommcd]

I wrote the post with CAPS LOCK on so it should have all been in upper case but that is how it turned out when it was submitted.

[calvi36]

Don't worry about it Dom, we don't shoot people for that in here!

[dommcd]

Well thats good, I can sleep easy tonight ha ha.

 

I've also just noticed I used the word whole instead of just hole. Makes me wonder why I'm having to pay off that student loan lol.

[curlychic]

Dommcd - hear hear (just not sure about 'propering' each word!)

 

I am still here, at present am keeping a low profile as several things are still in the air. When everything has been worked out / decided I WILL let you know.

 

Everybody keep up the fight - especially those with the hull case going on.

 

Just remember there is always more than one way to skin any cat

 

 

Good to see you back Kev ....

 

Looking forward to seeing whats 'in the air' .... lol

 

XxXxX

[calvi36]

Don't worry about that either, could have been worse you could have added the letter A infront of whole or hole ahem. Just remember two halves don't always make a hole but a cpl of bankers normally = an A in front lol.

 

Back on track now, keep going kev and I hope FOS come down in your favour .

[Gez]

I was quietly hoping that this judge was actually trying to be a bit clever by making this ruling, therefore forcing an appeal which could then go onwards & upwards to set a precedent. But no such luck, if you can only appeal with the same evidence you had the original hearing, so just as Martin Lewis says, this judge really didn't know his ISA from his elbow.

 

On the bright side, I'm sure you will successfully turn this around one way or the other & you'll have a great story for your grandkids

[fendyweather]

Ooooh riveted to this thread now........... need to be sure how this pans out for my own case, lol xxx

 

Go Kev, go Kev, ooooo yaaaaaaaaaaay, go Kev............... forgive me, twirling with meeee pom poms now..............

 

Fendy xxxx

[paulson1985]

Good Luck Kev,

 

My friend has a court date for 21st June no reply from SC&M.

 

His court bundle went in weeks ago nothing from them.

 

He is scared he will end up in court as well.

 

You are not on your own.

 

It does not make sense some are getting refunds some are not, it is indeed a lottery with Lloyds.

[Kevboy_telford]

Hi all

 

Firstly I want to thank you all for your support, help and well wishes over the past few weeks.

 

Unfortunately I have to inform you that I have decided that I will not be going ahead with an appeal. Although there were potential grounds for an appeal, I would have to rely on my original bundle of evidence - which as most of you know did not include T&Cs - and this would make my argument shaky.

Ultimately I decided that the risk of losing at an appeal - and the impact that this could have on everybody else's claims - was just not worthwhile.

 

I am now planning to contact the FOS and see if anything comes from that.

 

Cheers

 

Kevin