Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Could I clam PPI?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4461 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI,

 

Me and my partner took out a loan with the halifax a few years ago, and were sold PPI. I dont think the lady specifically said that our loan would be refused if we didnt take PPI, but it was definately implied, however she did say we were more likely to be accepted for the loan if we did.(we actually had good credit at the time). I know we had initially said no, especially not really knowing what it meant, but obviously we wanted to get accepted so agreed.

 

I think a few years later poss 1/2 I got a call from the bank regarding the loan (well i presume it was for that loan, we had 2) asking how getting the loan went and were we happy? obviously not knowing about mis-selling back then, we just thought it was all the norm and said yes.

 

The thing is I want to know is could we claim on this as we defaulted on the loan after a few years I think, and I think the PPI stopped when the debt got passed to a DCA. I mean it might not even be worth claiming as I said we fell behind after poss 2/3 if that, and with the loan not fully paid off not sure if its even poss.

 

I am about to start repaying this loan when I set up a payment plan, but will probably get all my papers just to check, but i'm pretty sure the PPI stopped a long time ago. As we couldnt keep up with repayments.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW,

 

When we took out our mortgage, we were also given insurance TMP- total mortgage protection.

We never had a choice in this, or told we could shop around, just that we had to have it........is that correct with it being a mortgage or is that mis-sold aswell??. This also stopped about 2/3 years ago as we fell behind with payments on the mortgage,(had it for about 6 years i think),

so we just got a letter 1 day saying it was cancelled.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ims21,

No not at the moment, I will have to send off a SAR to be sure of dates and totals. Do you think they are likely to payout as both were defaulted on and also not paid off yet?(both PPI and TMP ahve stopped on them though now because of this).

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Have a read of No.1 in my signature...there'some information there

 

When you cancelled the PPI you should really have received a rebate but the SAR will confirm or deny that.

 

Best do the SAR first and then you can do your calculations knowing what the actuality is.

 

In your SAR, add a paragraph which says you want a copy of the loan agreement as they may not provide it unless you highlight it.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...