Jump to content


Supreme Court rules deductions unlawful during BR and DRO's


ErikaPNP
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4501 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Applies to England and Wales only

 

This is big news, news which we have awaited since March 2010. The Supreme court have finally ruled on the case of Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne and Another

 

Since the ruling of R v Secretary of State for Social Security, Ex p Taylor and Chapman [1997], the DWP have been allowed to make deductions from benefit during a period of insolvency to recoup overpayments and Social Fund Loans.

 

In March of 2010, the legality of deductions during a moratorium period of a Debt Relief order was challenged and then began the battle. Cut to the chase - DWP have lost each and every court battle on it. The Supreme Court have dismissed their appeal and not only have the ruled that deductions during the moratorium period of a DRO are unlawful - they have also ruled that the judgment in Taylor and Chapman was wrongly decided. This also means that deductions can no longer be taken from benefit in the 12 month period between the commencement of a bankruptcy order and being discharged from bankruptcy.

 

In a nut shell: DWP can no longer make deductions to your benefits for overpayments or social fund loans which are included in a DRO or a bankruptcy order.

Link to the judgment here

 

DWP have released a bulletin on it also. View here

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...