Cap1 & CCA return

[ladybird17]

ok - I'm MRS BLOBBY!!!!

[un1boy]

Are you saying the summons has been served and they are basically ignoring it ?

 

Certainly sounds like a proxy acknowledgement to me

 

Sorry, I haven't been clear enough!

 

They said that once they had received a copy of the court notice with the hearing date they would cease collection activity.

 

I sent it recorded with a letter (which I want a reply to) detailing each area she had contradicted herself etc. I sent the court paper with it.

 

she hasn't acknowledged receipt of the papers but then I did a DPA request as part of the letter I sent with them and they have actioned the DPA.

 

The court summons was sent about 2 weeks after she received everything....

[tamadus]

Sorry, I haven't been clear enough!

 

They said that once they had received a copy of the court notice with the hearing date they would cease collection activity.

 

I sent it recorded with a letter (which I want a reply to) detailing each area she had contradicted herself etc. I sent the court paper with it.

 

she hasn't acknowledged receipt of the papers but then I did a DPA request as part of the letter I sent with them and they have actioned the DPA.

 

The court summons was sent about 2 weeks after she received everything....

 

Ahh ok as they should have been served with the claim summons well before any hearing date. at that point when they have to acknowledge they should stop all enforcement action until the court claim is resolved.

[elizabeth1]

Good God, that old chestnut again........and you've got me mentioning food items now!! Hussy!!!

 

Did someone mention food?? I am all ears!!

[un1boy]

Ahh ok as they should have been served with the claim summons well before any hearing date. at that point when they have to acknowledge they should stop all enforcement action until the court claim is resolved.

 

Oh, Tam they acknowledge the claim back in december.

 

Then started chasing the debt in feb until I wrote about 3 stern letters and got it sorted - I was told hey were allowed to chase it even if it was in dispute!

 

They agreed to suspend action after i sent them a letter calling them a bully.

 

The summons she has received is the one from them, for the debt they started chasing in feb! :-/

[un1boy]

Did someone mention food?? I am all ears!!

 

 

Mmmm, me too!!

[ladybird17]

off thread topic

[Cornucopia]

off thread topic

 

Has somebody got a gun to your head Bird????!!

 

Have moved over now Tam, you can sit down again.......

 

Am I about to be told off????

[un1boy]

off thread topic

 

sorry! :-/

[elizabeth1]

off thread topic

 

 

OK - sorry - sorry - sorry - won't do it again!!

 

I promise to behave now!!!

[tamadus]

Oh, Tam they acknowledge the claim back in december.

 

Then started chasing the debt in feb until I wrote about 3 stern letters and got it sorted - I was told hey were allowed to chase it even if it was in dispute!

 

They agreed to suspend action after i sent them a letter calling them a bully.

 

The summons she has received is the one from them, for the debt they started chasing in feb! :-/

 

one question comes to mind here.

 

Are these people even on the same planet as the rest of us ?

 

Somebody needs to tell her in no uncertain terms that persuing it once court action starts contravenes every rule in the book and could even affect any case they have.

[tamadus]

OK - sorry - sorry - sorry - won't do it again!!

 

I promise to behave now!!!

 

That will be a first

[Guest The Guvner]

one question comes to mind here.

 

Are these people even on the same planet as the rest of us ?

 

Somebody needs to tell her in no uncertain terms that persuing it once court action starts contravenes every rule in the book and could even affect any case they have.

 

In a short sharp answer no!!

[tamadus]

In a short sharp answer no!!

 

Then it should be fun when we set off that bomb we have been nurturing all this time

[un1boy]

one question comes to mind here.

 

Are these people even on the same planet as the rest of us ?

 

Somebody needs to tell her in no uncertain terms that persuing it once court action starts contravenes every rule in the book and could even affect any case they have.

 

No they aren't.

 

They told me, eveytime I called them that they are entitled to contact her even though the court claim has been issued and whilst it is in dispute!

 

So, would you suggest me just leaving it now and sending a copy of the letter as a defence?

[elsinore]

Els if we do utilise a database we must then comply with the DPA if we keep any personally identifiable information on it.

 

Yes, of course Tam, it requires a lot of thinking through.

 

Els

.

[tamadus]

No they aren't.

 

They told me, eveytime I called them that they are entitled to contact her even though the court claim has been issued and whilst it is in dispute!

 

So, would you suggest me just leaving it now and sending a copy of the letter as a defence?

 

I suggest you stop phoning them immediately and put everything in writting. Also refuse to answer any calls from her by refusing to answer security questions. That should push them into committing it to paper which will boost your chances of winning if it gets into court.

[un1boy]

No they aren't.

 

They told me, eveytime I called them that they are entitled to contact her even though the court claim has been issued and whilst it is in dispute!

 

So, would you suggest me just leaving it now and sending a copy of the letter as a defence?

 

I've sent the court a copy of all of their correspondence and a copy of my replies too, so they are aware!!

[tamadus]

Yes, of course Tam, it requires a lot of thinking through.

 

Els

.

 

CAG itself is a registered data controller but I suspect this will operate seperately, owing to its nature.

[un1boy]

I suggest you stop phoning them immediately and put everything in writting. Also refuse to answer any calls from her by refusing to answer security questions. That should push them into committing it to paper which will boost your chances of winning if it gets into court.

 

Thanks Tam - I only really called them once,that was before I got them to tell me it was frozen - she also confirmed that my sisters number had been removed from their system and that all correspondence would be in writing, so that's done now.

 

It's just a waiting game now, huh?

 

And, they have added more charges to the balance on the summons!! lmfao!

[tamadus]

Thanks Tam - I only really called them once,that was before I got them to tell me it was frozen - she also confirmed that my sisters number had been removed from their system and that all correspondence would be in writing, so that's done now.

 

It's just a waiting game now, huh?

 

And, they have added more charges to the balance on the summons!! lmfao!

 

Nahhh start working on your court bundle so it's ready and waiting for all the extra evidence they give you and your not panicing at the last minute

[un1boy]

Nahhh start working on your court bundle so it's ready and waiting for all the extra evidence they give you and your not panicing at the last minute

 

Cool, nice one.....they are so stupid sometimes, aren't they?

[TANZARELLI]

CAG itself is a registered data controller but I suspect this will operate seperately, owing to its nature.

 

I didn't know that. Does that mean we a send a SAR to CAG requesting all data you hold on us a s data subject and you would have to provide a list of all our posts. lol

 

Only joking.

 

I suppose you would have to be as people register to the site and that means the site holds info re subjects.

[un1boy]

I didn't know that. Does that mean we a send a SAR to CAG requesting all data you hold on us a s data subject and you would have to provide a list of all our posts. lol

 

Only joking.

 

I suppose you would have to be as people register to the site and that means the site holds info re subjects.

 

Yeah, I didn't know that either.

 

Makes sense though!

[tamadus]

I didn't know that. Does that mean we a send a SAR to CAG requesting all data you hold on us a s data subject and you would have to provide a list of all our posts. lol

 

Only joking.

 

I suppose you would have to be as people register to the site and that means the site holds info re subjects.

 

Thats the gist of it as soon as anybody holds data which can personally identify a person the they fall within the scope of the DPA.