Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

#PPI : No account number


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4676 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks for that , that was a bit sneaky me thinks !! Im just waiting for a call back from RBS but it looks like they are now putting tham all together so the total will be over the £5k limit for small claims :-(

 

thanks

CB

Still Fighting 4 PPI claims getting there slowly :smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi That was my original idea however now it looks like they have decided to deal with all 5 claims as one however they have not confirmed this as yet I am still a waiting there reply :-(

thanks

CB

Still Fighting 4 PPI claims getting there slowly :smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

By all means wait for their reply but remember what they want to do and what you want to do may be poles apart if you know what I mean :wink:

 

ims

That was my thoughts exactly! If your in control, they will have to deal with them as you guide. Don't let them take control - its your claim(s)

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all for your advise , think I will go the court way any body any ideas who and what address for the RBS to send the N1 ' s to ?

CB

 

 

Have you looked in the RBS forum stickies?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all for your advise , think I will go the court way any body any ideas who and what address for the RBS to send the N1 ' s to ?

CB

 

Have you looked in the RBS Forum Stickies?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all for your advise , think I will go the court way any body any ideas who and what address for the RBS to send the N1 ' s to ?

CB

 

Have you looked in the RBS Forum Stickies?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you not send the N1 forms to the court?

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all thanks for the advice sorry for the delay in posting back but am having broadband probs decided that i am going the court way how ever can any one clear this up although I think I know the answer had RBS on the phone stating that as they made me an offer on one of these complaints ( I rejected the offer ) "on the 1st March 2011 as this was before the judgment date so they dont have to pay the 8%" oh and forgot to add the best bit " that it is against the law !! to try to take court action unless its been to the FOBS first and they will ignore any such action ???

 

Thanks

CB

Edited by curly bob
still a muppett

Still Fighting 4 PPI claims getting there slowly :smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

so they dont have to pay the 8%" oh and forgot to add the best bit

 

what a load of bullworks!!

 

its even in the fos pdf's

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oooh this could be good

 

They say they will ignore such action....so

 

Court papers issued

 

They ignore

 

Judgement by default in your favour

 

Job done!

 

And of course that's against the law!

 

Where do these people get their ideas from?

 

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

well Ive just had an offer from RBS on one of these claims and it is around £550.00 less than I had worked it out to, also they want to take tax off at 20% has any one else has this ?

Thanks

CB

Still Fighting 4 PPI claims getting there slowly :smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

well Ive just had an offer from RBS on one of these claims and it is around £550.00 less than I had worked it out to, also they want to take tax off at 20% has any one else has this ?

Thanks

CB

 

Hi

 

How much had you calculated? is it the amount of £2,500 you mention in the early part of the thread?

 

RBS can take tax off the stat interest part providing they give you a certificate of tax deduction. You may be a non taxpayer and would have to claim that back from HMRC.

 

RBS is the only bank I've come accross that makes the deduction at source, all the others advise you that you should declare it but they pay you gross.

 

Can you post up their calcs so that we can check it?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ims thanks for the reply , no its not the claim for £2,500 this is a different one i worked it out at around £1,770.00 I will post up the original agreement and there offer for you to have a look at the offer letter is very small ? almost you may think to stop it being posted up:madgrin: ( thats if your a bit suspicious)

not me of course :wink:

 

Thanks

CBcust off.doc

agree be.doc

Still Fighting 4 PPI claims getting there slowly :smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm..

 

they are deducting the tax

 

dont think they can actually do that?

 

its written somewhere p'haps the fos pdf's i think

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm..

 

they are deducting the tax

 

dont think they can actually do that?

 

its written somewhere p'haps the fos pdf's i think

 

dx

 

Well I wasn't sure but there's another thread on here where they did it but I can't find it now.

 

The 8% stat is potentially a taxable income if the claimant is a taxpayer of course but RBS is the only one I've known to try and tax it at source.

 

I'll do some looking and post any findings I come accross.

 

Regards

 

ims

Edited by ims21
  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...