Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Fraudulent Card Payments Laws **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4922 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know the specific law/s that relate to an organisation taking payments from your card without your approval ? I know they exist but I don't the specifics of the law and I need to write a letter to Natwest about Quick Quid having done exactly that to me.

__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope, I made a payment to them over the phone with my debit card. The next month they took the entire outstanding amount and a £12 penalty late fee without my approval, and against my direct instructions NOT to take any payments without me being on the other end of the phone approving it. I agreed a payment plan with them and they just ignored it.

 

I claimed the money back entirely from Visa/Natwest but Natwest didn't receive my later fax (although the fax machine I used confirmed their receipt grr) explaining the situation when QQ protested at the refund, so Natwest gave the money back to QQ. I now have to write a later to Natwests Fraud Department to claim the money back again. So I need as much accurate info as possible to make it as hard hitting as possible !!!

__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers I'll move it to the Legal Issues forum :)

__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I was advised to post here to get some advise.

 

I (stupidly I know) had an account with Quick Quid. I found I couldn't make the payment plan so I restructured the payment plan. I made a payment to them over the phone with my debit card. The next month they took the entire outstanding amount and a £12 penalty late fee without my approval, and against my direct instructions NOT to take any payments without me being on the other end of the phone approving it. I agreed a payment plan with them and they just ignored it.

 

I claimed the money back entirely from Visa/Natwestlink3.gif but Natwest didn't receive my later fax (although the fax machine I used confirmed their receipt grr) explaining the situation when QQ protested at the refund, so Natwest gave the money back to QQ. I now have to write a later to Natwests Fraud Department to claim the money back again.

 

So I need as much accurate info as possible regarding the laws about payments and use of card details to make it as hard hitting as possible to ensure that Natwest will give me back my money !!!

 

Anyone able to help ?

__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have grounds for a complaint to the Banking Ombudsman here, Natwest have failed to have in place proper refund procedure, and have flouted a direct request for a refund when monies were taken in error.

 

Quick Quid will take the money - in this case you now need to make sure they do not have access to any further funds of yours.

 

Get a new bank account and do not fall for the 'we need your bank details' trick, if anyone phones up. They tried it with me and I said I would go to a branch to confirm my identity and bank details.....

 

You can also involve your local MP, they might be interested in the way NatWest encourage these companies to misuse the banking codes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the loan company processed a payment on your card without your signature they would need to process it as a telephone payment and this would mean that they would need the 3 digits on the back of your card. If you originally gave them the 3 digits for the first transaction that is fine, however there are new standards being introduced called PCIDSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards) which means that they if they retain your 3 digit code (CVC) they are in breach of these regulations. No-one including banks are allowed to store this number and if used it must be destroyed. It might be that they were able to process the payment without this number but normally if the cardholder isn't present they would be asked for it.

 

https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...