Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Co-op Dn & Termination


molly13
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3793 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Having gone through my OH's paperwork this evening I came across the following:

 

I know the DN dated 3 may 2006 is probably not valid, however on 6th of may he received a letter demanding full payment.

Is this right?

 

Can anyone enlighten me on this please?

 

http://i649.photobucket.com/albums/uu218/molly13_01/co-op/coop019.jpg

 

 

http://i649.photobucket.com/albums/uu218/molly13_01/co-op/coop018.jpg

Thanks in advance.

Regards

Molly:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The DN is invalid - they didn't give sufficient time to remedy the breach. Termination on the back of an unlawful DN causes unlawful rescission ie they can only claim the arrears at the time of the DN but the Co-op are so stupid they don't even know they can do that. What your husband must do to seal the rescission legally is write to the Co-op and tell them that he accepts their repudiation of contract which ocurred when they terminated the alleged agreement on such-and-such a date following issue of an unlawful DN on such-and-such a date. The Co-op never learn - they are still doing this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually I also came across a letter from 2007 from DCA saying their client was prepared to offer a 20% discount for a limited time only...

Maybe they had realised their mistake:rolleyes:

 

Molly:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are truly amazing they did the same to me so i wrote to them informing them of the invalid DN their reply was a termination notice lol

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi pompeyfaith,

 

I don't think OH had an actual letter saying Termination Notice.. just the letter demanding full payment, which I assume means they terminated the account.

 

Molly:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i had a demand letter too giving me 7 days to pay up and then the termination came 14 days later

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres a letter from a solicitor demanding full payment within 7 days on 24th May 2006...LOL

Oh dear, I didn't realise that they were that useless.

 

A letter accepting their repudiation will be off tomorrow..:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you molly yes she is my darling and has just recovered from an RTA there is a couple of threads in the vets forum on this

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it cost me in excess of £5000 so glad i had the insurance in place

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good point Cerberusalert...but thankfully they just couldn't contain their enthusiasm and went on to send the rather un-cooperative letter just 3 days after issuing the dn, demanding full balance and terminating the account.

Thank goodness they are ethically guided!

(As opposed to guided by the law :rolleyes:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank You cerberusalert but the bubble is still floting lol as we are aware of that fact what the op was refering to was a letter of demand

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning all,

 

Thanks Cerberus, does that mean he shouldn't send the repudiation letter?

 

I'm quite confused now (for a change lol) but the DN states remedy of arrears by 17th May or else..and yet my OH got the letter dated 6th May demanding full amount. Are we to accept this as termination notice?

 

And where do we go from here please?

 

Thanks also to undercover-elsa and pompeyfaith:)

 

Regards

 

Molly:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

what cerberusalert is correct as for recinding/termination but the fact remains that they have given you a nice double wammy in that the DN was not correct the coop are systematic in getting the dates wrong they did this to me 2 years ago and another 3 times since you will find the date of the DN and the remedy date only gives 14 days and they allow no time to serve said doc on you

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

indeed the time between date of doc and remedy should be at least 19 days as they use uk mail to send

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Molly :)

So, it's unanimous that you do need to send the letter acception the unlawful recission of contract.

 

Something on the lines of: (edited from a Vint original :) )

 

Dear xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,

 

Re account no xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Unlawful Rescission.

 

I refer to your Default Notice dated xxxxxxxxxx, received by me on xxxxxxxxxxx and your subsequent letter terminating the agreement by demanding the balance in full, dated xxxxxxxxxx, received xxxxxxxxx,

While the default notice did technically give me the required statutory time in which to seek legal advice and/or remedy any alleged defect, your subsequent action only 3 days later in issuing a demand for full payment and terminating the account resulted in insufficient time for me to even obtain an appointment with a solicitor let alone remedy the alleged default. The Consumer Credit Act is absolutely clear on the requirement to issue a compliant Default Notice and allow the statutory period of time prior to having the right to proceed to demand the full balance or terminate an agreement. You have clearly failed to do so, which has resulted in you unlawfully rescinding the alleged agreement.

 

I have elected to accept your unlawful rescission of the agreement and I note that you are now entitled to claim those arrears genuinely due at the time of the termination (not including any unlawful charges ) and I would be obliged if you would advise me of the exact amount of those arrears, against which will be a claim for unlawful rescission

 

 

Yours xxxxxx

 

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you cerberusalert going back to the first post i stand corrected yes molly in your case it is indeed even better as it is 7 days plus service

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nice letter elsa

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...