Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Faulty Acer Laptop from PC World.


Peteinhull
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5221 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

I'd appreciate any help that any of you could offer, although I suspect that my options are limited.

 

In December 2009 I purchased an Acer Laptop from PC World in Hull. I declined that additional warranty they always offer you. The laptop was for my girlfriend for Christmas who was, as you would imagine, thrilled at receiving it. Needless to say, that she has looked after the laptop like a new born baby!

 

Over the last month or so, it has developed a flicker to the left hand side of the screen, nothing major, just occasionally flickering to the left hand quarter of the screen. I reported this to The Techguys, PC Worlds repair people and they arranged for the laptop to be collected for repair.

 

I have just received the laptop back with a repair docket from Acer, on which they have reported the following:

 

LCD-X-7-Cutsomer has spilled liquid over the lcd panel. This is not covered by the customers warranty. The unit has been returned unrepaired as requested.

 

This is nonsense, there has been no liquid anywhere near the laptop. I called Acer and told them so, and they stated that I would have to take it up with PC World. I rang PC World and they basically stated that if Acwer has reported that liquid has been spilled over the LCD then it has.

 

:mad: So I am now at an impass. My word against theres. And by the look of it, they usually win.

 

I have heard of the Sale of Goods Act 1979, specificially sec. 47 & 48 and wonder whether this applied to this case and which would be the best couse of action.

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

 

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

get an independent engineers report done.

and take it from there

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would need an independent engineers report done as dx says. I'd be very wary though, as if he does find any liquid damage inside the unit you'll be stuck paying for the report with no recourse.

 

Normaly if acer or thetechguys wanted to cop out of a repair, they'd just claim the damage was neglectful. Claiming water damage is unusual because if you open the machine up it's very easy to prove/disprove.

Link to post
Share on other sites

[Normaly if acer or thetechguys wanted to cop out of a repair, they'd just claim the damage was neglectful. Claiming water damage is unusual because if you open the machine up it's very easy to prove/disprove.

 

I don't suppose using a liquid screen cleaner would cause this sort of damage would it? And if so, surely the design of the screen is such that it is not fit for purpose. I'm not saying she's hosed it down with the stuff, but she has used a specific LCD cleaning spray on it.

 

Also, anyone got any ideas of where I would find an independent engineer in the Hull area?

 

Thanks again guys.

 

Pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Total rubbish.

 

Under the sale of goods act the product is considered inherently faulty (within 6months as this is) unless the seller can PROVE (not say) it was).

 

If they can, and you are sure there is no damage, then you will need an independent engineer to say what the fault was caused by.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spraying anything on the screen can indeed cause damage, as far as I am aware you should always spray on to a cloth and use that, and not directly on to the screen itself.

 

It is liquid after all and the screen is not impervious to such products

Ex-Retail Manager who is happy to offer helpful advise in many consumer problems based on my retail experience. Any advise I do offer is my opinion and how I understand the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, re-call pc world

 

dont worry about explaining what acer said thats seperate

 

remind them you have a right to an uplift (probably under a u20 code - whatever that is) for a PCWORLD engineer to check the screen over

 

Poor_screen_quality.jpg

 

thats an example of what i would expect a liquid damaged screen to look like.

 

 

 

although re-reading the origional post where does the report come from LCD-X-7 sounds suspiciously like a pcworld code i beleave acer use a differnt report

 

if it is a pcworld report its probably on green paper, with a engineer number that ussually starts with a T or a W

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pete

 

 

Right been there, done that with PC World a few years back now.

I purchased a computer a few years back, had a fault with in the first few weeks. Ended up taking it back to the store 30+ times in that year, explained to the managed i was not satisfied with this and wanded my money back or a replacement or i would take them to Court.

 

Know there's two ways you could try, one if there is liquid in the PC you could try your Home insurance for accidental damage.

Or as was mentioned get an independent report, and take PC World to Court.

 

In my case i had to take them to Court, but good news i won the day and got a full refund of £2400.00 plus £250.00 costs back.

 

But push PC World as i've found that there aftercare is Cr...p.

 

 

Gaz

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...