Jump to content


Excess mileage charge following Voluntary Termination


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2913 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have voluntarily terminated my finance agreement with Mercedes Benz Financial Services, having paid 50% of the full value of the agreement. The vehicle has been collected. MBFS have now written to me claiming excess mileage charges, where I have exceeded the contracted mileage per year (when calculated on a pro-rata basis). My enquiry is simple: Do I have any right NOT to pay the excess mileage charge? Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have thought not. Calculating it on a pro rata basis seems a reasonable approach to a reduced term contract.

 

If you had kept the car for 6 months longer than the original term, I am sure you would have expected them to add in a further 6 months allowance on a pro rata basis, so the same should work when reducing the term.

 

Isn't there any reference to it within the contract? How much is the charge per mile and the amount of extra miles they are claiming?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response. I agree it's a reasonable approach, afterall I am talking about some 30k+ miles over. This was the simplest (and cheapest) way of getting rid of the car, even with the penalty.

 

My enquiry was whether or not anyone had challenged that part of the VT clause that states "nothing more to pay" once 50% of the overall sum had been paid. i.e. With a literal interpretation of the wording of the Act, could it be argued that there is indeed nothing more to pay? It seems the Finance Company contract has to use the wording of the Act (quite rightly), and avoids any additional wording to the VT clause.

 

I appreciate the intent of what was in the original contract; I just wondered, with nothing further to lose, whether it was worth quoting the wording of the CCAct and the contract to see if i could avoid paying it all together?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your contract will also include a phrase like " and have taken reasonable care of the goods". I suspect they would be able to sucessfully argue that putting an extra 30K miles on the clock has not been reasonable and, quite rightly, has devalued the car below it's reasonably expected value.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I know most contracts have a total mileage and a yearly mileage clause. So theoretically if you'd kept the car and laid it up the mileage will reduce back to the contract figure. Test it by all means but I think you'll find the leasing co's latched on to this a long time ago. The simple fact is you're way over mileage and thats that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crem, I have to say it was all a bit of an anticlimax.

 

My query was based on the wording of the Act, which had been replicated in my contract. It was the part refering to 'nothing further to pay' once 50% of the agreement had been paid, providing the goods had been taken reasonable care of. It was clear that the Finance Company have to cite the Act word for word and did so in isolation of anything else. It is only in their own Terms and Conditions that they refer to Excess Mileage etc and then it is tenuous whether it applies in the case of a VT.

 

So, long story short, I phoned the company and they asked what my query was. I said that 'As I have invoked my statutory right to voluntarily terminate and the paperwork says in that case I have nothing further to pay, can you explain how you can invoice me for further costs?'

 

The immediate reply was 'Can you hold for a minute?'

 

After a minute of waiting and steeling myself for a debate, the chap came back on and simply said, 'Yes, we'll withdraw that invoice. There is nothing further to pay.'

'Is that it?'

'Yes. We will cancel the invoice.'

 

'Er, Ok. Can I have that in writing then please?'

 

We didn't even talk about whether or not I wanted to pay it. I was, afterall, just asking them to explain it. So, I now have an e-mail stating 'We confirm that the above account has been closed. The amount of £####.## has been classed as void, due to the terms of your agreement with regards to voluntary terminations.'

 

All I can think is that Contract cannot overwrite Statute, but I was amazed how simply it was just made void. They very obviously knew where they stood given the speed of the response.

Like I said, Happy Days. Thanks for your interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Only just seen this when searching for similar info - that really was a cracking result! - 30k miles over the allowed and that happens? thats like 2 years worth of free car - well done!

 

My situation is slightly more complicated in that its a conditional sale where I defaulted and they are attempting to invoke an excess mileage charge

 

I'm claiming UTCRR on the basis the excess charge would make them a serious (£K's!) profit over and above actual costs

 

Time will tell how that argument goes - claim is due at hearing in a few weeks time

 

:|

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Hi

I am going through the same but Mercedes are not backing down any advice or have you a copy of the actual contract I can see, I am onto Onbudsman but first feed back from them is I would need to pay, just wondering if the contracts are the same I took mine out in 2012 a bit later than yours

Any advise from you may be helpful.

dcpenno

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I am going through the same but Mercedes are not backing down any advice or have you a copy of the actual contract I can see, I am onto Onbudsman but first feed back from them is I would need to pay, just wondering if the contracts are the same I took mine out in 2012 a bit later than yours

Any advise from you may be helpful.

dcpenno

 

 

thread is from 2011

you wont get seen here

start a new thread

of your own please

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...