Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bookworm v Barclaycard ***she's only been and won it! :-D***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6033 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I think the judge will mostly be interested in coming to the correct figure, whatever it is. I think the fact that they didn't provide the information when asked in a SAR will only become relevent if they try to have it thrown out for being incorrect. In truth though, I doubt they'd even try. Small claims is a fantastic leveller, and in my experience the judge/sheriff will focus most on 'seeking the truth' rather than legal technicalities. And if you think about it, small claims pretty much has to operate like that, because if it didn't, the average layman would get a good kicking from any professional litigation lawyer they came up against.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Something else to bear in mind, which is rarely mentioned on the forum. There is an assumption that if the bank defends your claim you will all go off to court one day and the matter will be dealt with there and then. The reality is quite different. What actually happens is that you case will be heard in four or five hearings spread over about six months. Which gives all parties ample time to get all t heir ducks in a row.

 

There's no doubt that the first time you go to court against a huge company it's a very scary experience. But actually, when you come out you wonder what the fuss was about. Most of what happens in court is simply common sense, and if you're a layman the judges usually do a pretty good job of making sure that if you lose it's because your argument was wrong, not your procedure.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I missing something here? Is it me?

 

To sum up, I asked B/card to refund me 2.6 k, based on their cr*p printout.

 

They replied, saying they only started charging for o/limit from mid 01, so my estimation was out of whack, offered me £60.

 

I answered last week, saying: ok, taking in that point (from 01) into account, still worked out 2.5k, prove me wrong.

 

Answer today: (now remember these people have claimed that my information is not covered under DPA, as microfiche)

 

1st, he encloses copies, clearly labelled "copy statement", clearly showing account number, name, account address. Now if that is not a relevant filing system, I sure as hell do not know what is. (they claim the microfiche is filed by date, btw)

 

Then, he says, that "on an exceptional basis", he has obtained copies of the statements frm december 02, but hasn't had a chance to retrieve earlier ones yet, and has reviewed the ones he has. For that period, says he, only 1 charge, which was refunded, and encloses copies of the said statement.

 

Therefore, surprise surprise, my calculations are wrong, says he. Accordingly, the offer of £60 stands, and is still open for me to accept.

 

He then proceeds to explain about DPA, bla bla bla...

 

I am currently seething at the arrogance of these people.

 

However, I think he may well at last have given me what I needed to go to the IC with it, (thank you, Mr Walker, if you're reading this!).

 

I will now unleash my last volley before launching court action. (shhh for now)

 

For those who wonder why I haven't followed our own forum guidelines, letter/letter/court claim, let's just say that I wanted to test a few issues first, and see what came out. I'm really not that fussed about the money at this stage, since I never expected to see it again anyway in the first place...

 

More as it becomes available...

 

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting. funny how things kind of 'turn up' when they suddenly get backed into a corner!

 

Good one for putting in the effort to try the different tactics - the microfiche argument in particular seems to causing a lot of issues so it would be nice to crack it.

If you found this post useful please click on the scales above.

 

Egg - £400 - Prelim sent. On hold.

Mint - On the list Est £800

GE Capital - On the list (3 accounts!) Est £4000

 

MBNA - £545 Prelim sent 13/11/2006

LBA sent 1/12/2006

£350 partial payment received 18/12/2006.

Full settlement received 20/1/07

 

NatWest - Est £4000 not incl interest

Data Protection Act Sent 10/1/07

Statements received 24/1/07

Prelim sent 3/2/07

Full Settlement received 22/2/07

 

The contents of this post are the sole opinions of The Cornflake and not necessarily the opinions of any other members of this group. They do not constitute sound legal or financial advice and if in doubt you are advised to seek advice from a qualified professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

bookworm

 

I await your outcomes as I too am having the same microfiche issue, just posted a similar question.

 

Feel like im banging my head on a brick wall here, and it aint pretty, Im going in a foul mood :(

 

All the best to you

Lynz

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

bookworm

 

Do you think there is any point in phoning them up at b/card and saying to them, if you can give me my statements at £3 a copy then you blatantly have them there for me under the DPA

 

Or shall I just sue their asses? Dont really have the money to take this one to court as well, but will find it if I have to ? Its SO scandalous that they can even try to get away with what is one of the most used peices of legislation in the UK.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope. I'm a firm believer that whatever bull they're going to feed me, I want it in writing, this way, no wriggling room. I've had too many prats saying I had misunderstood, what with me being "one of them bloody foreigners an' all, know what ah mean, mate?" notwithstanding the fact that my English is probably 20 times better then theirs... I don't take chances any more... :)

 

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Bookworm, this is an interesting development. Are you going to take this to the IC? Wonder what their answer will be?

 

If the IC do nothing are there other options for publicly embarrassing Barclaycard and revealing the true extent of the lie?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll follow your lead I think on this one Bookworm

 

PM me if you think theres anything specific i should add. im like a coiled spring on this one and dont want to cause a mess for the cause from being chaotic and angry

 

*takes deep breath*

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bookworm - I'm also having a torrid time with barclaycard and I'm reading this and other barclaycard threads with great interest.....

 

I hope that your claim is successful - The more you push, the more seems to be uncovered and comes to light for everyone on this site....

 

If you don't have one already, I'd suggest this one is stickied and moved to the top of the board!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bookworm - I've just read your complete thread from start to finish.

 

Fantastic.

 

Buoys me up no end for my relatively simple battle with Lloyds TSB.

 

But I have had several Barclaycards in the past - so with the benefits of your excellent efforts I'll tackle them next after Lloyds.

 

 

Again Well Done - you are an inspiration.

 

Nail 'Em

 

E.I.Addyo

Prelim Letter Sent 12th June 06

LBA Hand Delivered 23rd June 06 - Standard Responses.

Owed £2193.80

Court Questionnaire Completed.

S.C.& M AQ Received..........19th Sept 06

 

Pending Court Date

 

This is MY MONEY - I want it back !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Bookworm

 

How is your case coming on is it still on going?

Best Regards<br />

<br />

Clarkey1<br />

<br />

<b><font color="red"><img src="images/smilies/laugh.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Laughing" smilieid="25" class="inlineimg" /> <u>If I have helped then please click on the scales</u> </font></b><img src="images/smilies/laugh.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Laughing" smilieid="25" class="inlineimg" />

Link to post
Share on other sites

To my great shame and embarassment, it is going absolutely nowhere fast, simply because I have not done anything with it... I have 2 small claims going at the moment, and found that between those, life outside the forum, and mostly the forum, I just couldn't cope with adding on. So B/Card is on ice for now, but not forgotten. Hell no. When I take them on head on, I want to be sure I give them my (reasonably) undivided attention. :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

just read your thread and came across you asking anyone about charges before 2001

well i have an unauth o/d fee £20.00 charged to account on 07 Jun 99

and unpaids out @£25 on 5th oct 99 Prior to this thay called it overdaft ussage fee and was £5

and all my charges start from those 2 dates so what they told you is utter bull and now you can prove it i can supply proof that they lied to you regarding that date pm me and ill fax or post copys to you

Tesco Personal Finance Due to File in Court 03/04/07

 

Barclays 13/03/07 Paid in full £1998.78 :D

 

MBNA 10/10/06 Paid in full £1507.69 (inc 751.69 intrest):D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Right, well, putting my head above the wall, and resurrecting my thread.

 

I know, I know, I'm the one always telling people to stick their timetables, but what can I say... Too much going on in too many directions, sometimes, you have to pick your battles.

 

Anyway, I wrote to B/card before xmas with a narky letter about the ICO decision about Microfiche and to stop p...ing about. No reply. Silence. Is there any life out there?

 

Finally, 2 days ago, and 361 days after my SAR went, B/card have finally complied!!!

Well, when I say complied... Partly complied, they've only sent the info for one card and not the other. So another letter asking for info on card no2... Meanwhile, I am preparing my spreadsheet... As I had already sent them prelim and LBA on estimated amounts a long time ago, I can straight to court when I get the correct information, although I'll probably send them a reminder letter @ 7 days, just to refresh their memory...

 

Interestingly enough, quite a few charges may now have fallen behind the 6 yrs line, and I have no intention of letting them get away with that. :-D

 

More anon. I promise! :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I am a bad girl, have not been updating my thread.

 

Ok, let's see, got all info, sent revised LBA claiming just under £900, got letter today offering me £62, I kid you not. :rolleyes: This despite the fact that I told them not to bother with the "difference between OFT £12.00 and charges" rubbish, it just shows they don't read our letters, doesn't it...

 

Claim going in as soon as I can get court fee together, hopefully next week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a bad girl, have not been updating my thread.

 

Ok, let's see, got all info, sent revised LBA claiming just under £900, got letter today offering me £62, I kid you not. :rolleyes: This despite the fact that I told them not to bother with the "difference between OFT £12.00 and charges" rubbish, it just shows they don't read our letters, doesn't it...

 

Claim going in as soon as I can get court fee together, hopefully next week.

 

Please update your thread more often, this will allow me to guide you through the process!!! :p

 

*hides giggling behind the sofa*

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6033 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...