Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Johnboy v Halifax - SETTLED IN FULL!!!! -


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6587 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wrote to the Halifax with the first outlining letter and asking them for a list of all charges made on my account over the past 6 years. They replied within 7 days saying they are looking into my complaint. I have just received a letter saying they basically disagree that the charges are unlawful BUT have offered me 10% back - which is over £300.00 !! Oh and they have listed the charges for no cost as well. They want me to sign a statement to say I accept the refund as full settlement of my complaint. Not the reply I was expecting actually. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It's a good start. Tell them that you want the other 90%, and that they can stick the statement where the sun don't shine.

 

If they are lawfully entitled to the money, why on earth are they offering to give you some back? After all, they have a duty to shareholders to maximise profits...

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They've offered me around 50% of the charges levvied. This is before they have sent me the statements under the DPA request with 5 days left to comply.

 

Reading around tonight I get ups and downs on whether to accept or not. The story about being offered £1200 when a court case was filed was a spur, but I'm still unsure what is the most cost effective route.

 

Any words of encouragement to go on or advice to accept would be greatly received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have spent about 2 hours reading peoples stories and like you I am unsure of carrying on after their offer. But I have paid £3595 in charges over the past 6 years :evil: and it is only the success stories on this site that are keeping me going and probably insist on the full refund. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have spent about 2 hours reading peoples stories and like you I am unsure of carrying on after their offer. But I have paid £3595 in charges over the past 6 years :evil: and it is only the success stories on this site that are keeping me going and probably insist on the full refund. :lol:

 

Go for it. Keep us posted.

The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

john boy 999,

 

Your claim is very very serious as compared to my paltry £361. I sympathise with your dilemma more than my own, but perhaps we can view the position as a matter of principle, and go on, but you've have much much more at stake than me, if you were to fail.

 

let's wish each other good luck, and see if we can both come to a decision that will satisfy our concerns about going on or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a phone call from the Halifax today. (We had very serious financial difficulties from October 2005 up to re-mortgaging our house in early January 2006). I kept very calm when I spoke to the woman and she started off by offering me all January's charges back (our total charges are about £800 and this represented about £100). I held out and she then went on to offer December and January (about £400 of charges). At this point I nearly caved in (WHAT WAS I THINKING?) but then she asked if I was willing to accept reimbursement of last 6 months! I accepted (hey, I'm only human) and she is going to send me a letter of 'full and final settlement'. I was very reasonable with her and stressed that I didn't have a problem with them charging me SOME interest on overdraft but that these charges were way over the top.

 

I wish you all the best of luck and happy outcomes. Hang on in there and thanks to everyone on this forum for giving us all the encouragement to go for it

Link to post
Share on other sites

All our circumstances are different. You did what was best for you. God luck in the future. Tell your friends about us.

 

Howver, be carefull of what you sign. Come back if you have doubts.

The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Q: If they are legally entitled to the money, why on earth are they offering to give you some back?

 

This is the best unanswered questionof all!

 

A: Guilty conscience!

 

Action: Use it to the FULL!

Taming the Halifax!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evenin' all,

 

I'd heard the talk on the radio and and I am an avid fan of moneysavingexpert.com where I got the link for this site. there is a short article on MSE which outlines quite clearly the belief that if you stick to it, court or no court:

 

That money is yours.

 

For some the figures are less - for me it's not just about the money.

These last eighteen months have been the most financially stressful of my life. The cruel irony that says you should be reamed for more at the very moment you have the least to give stinks. It stinks for the same reason it take five days to clear a cheque while your transaction money gathers interest in their coffers. It stinks the same way they make you pay off low interest balance tansfers, before high interest purchases. It stinks because we're easy targets, afraid to rock a boat we think we'll sink without. Don't forget, you do them, the favour of keeping your hard earned wage in their safes and it is they who make you pay for it. I've paid more than enough for my overdraft and I'm looking forward getting those unlawful charges back.

Every available penny

21st June - Halifax offer £357 - responded 25th june in the negative

2nd June - Sent letter requesting repayment of charges over last 12 months tatalling £1,977

10th may - Confirm (by phone) I will pay for statements

2nd May - Halifax requests payment for statements and confirms no manual intervention has been carried out.

10th april - Request (by phone) investment report & details of manual intervention

Link to post
Share on other sites

phew!

21st June - Halifax offer £357 - responded 25th june in the negative

2nd June - Sent letter requesting repayment of charges over last 12 months tatalling £1,977

10th may - Confirm (by phone) I will pay for statements

2nd May - Halifax requests payment for statements and confirms no manual intervention has been carried out.

10th april - Request (by phone) investment report & details of manual intervention

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

After reading all the threads and scanning the site for over a week, I have told told halifax that I am NOT accepting the 10% refund on my bank charges that I have paid over the past 6 years. I will let you know the outcome in a week or so.........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you keep all your updates for this claim in this one thread please

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you it's just easier for you and also easier for others who are following .

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My son told me about a guy who won his case today, when i asked which bank he was claiming the charges back from he replied i don't know look on google,

 

So i did, and just look at the news today, How MOTIVATING ...and what a scream, I just love the comment the bank used for the judgement.....and no way would i even consider 10 % especially with this site and the amount of support and guidence you get from here.

 

Have got the link so u guys can be encouraged to go on, as i am. and it certainly made me smile on my Birthday today.....

 

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=399172006

Link to post
Share on other sites

In reply to your original question jon-boy.....

 

I would say something along the lines of.... "In response to your recent offer with regard to ...... May I remind you of the details of my original letter stating my request for re-imbursement of unlawful bank charges (quote the bit about unlawful in common law, statute and recent consumer regulations).

 

Although I appreciate your offer, I would like to notify you that my request was for £xxx, and should a positive response not be received by xx-04-2006, (quote your original deadline for payment) then I shall have no option but to file court action.

 

I do hope this matter can be resolved amicably blah blah.

 

Best of luck mate! x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds good to me! Just adjusted the wording on my first letter and it is stamped and ready to go later tonight. Also, have you heard that the Office of Fair Trading has concluded that credit card charges are UNLAWFUL as they are - let's hope that they publically conclude that bank charges are also illegal as it would make our plight alot easier. I will keep you informed of the outcome in a couple of weeks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im Back....... Well, after sending a letter of decline last week the Halifax telephoned me today and left a message asking nicely if I would ring them in the morning. As I am not that good at saying NO - person to person and I dont like using the phone as it is...... DOES ANYONE HAVE A GOOD ACTION PLAN THEY COULD SHARE WITH ME? I dont want to give in to them but I also need replies to their possible threats etc. Can anyone help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't call them if you don't feel comfortable/confident doing so.

 

If they call you, just politely tell them that you wish all communication to be done via written letter. Then end the call. Do not get coaxed into a conversation.

 

Maybe you could tell them "I'm sorry now is not a convienient time. Any further communication should be made via written letter" Tell them you are at work/have house guests for a fortnight/have a double glazing salesman drinking tea with you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I have just had my local news on TV and a Plymouth man has just lost (sort of) a court case against 6 banks and their charges. BUT the case was lost on the basis that the court did not have the power to say the charges are lawful or not and basically left it to the Financial Governing Body to investigate. BUT - he did NOT have to pay the massive court costs - THE BANKS DID. Bloody marvelous news. I will still be pressing ahead with my court claim just because of the shere determination of everyone on this site and it's operators. Lets go get um!

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6587 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...