Jump to content


ACS:Law copyright file sharing claims, Gallant Macmillan - and probably some others along the way...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4982 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Looking at the document there is no evidence to suggest that a 0-10 point system is used. It is more likely that things are scored out of 5 or even 3.

 

1 = No

2 = Maybe

3 = Yes

 

A scale from 1 to 10 would be impossible to score accurately don't you think?

 

Well this comes from the Google translator version of the 2nd link given.

 

"Finally, there is an overall assessment for the implementation of an action. These values are given on a scale 1 to 10 Ten stands for "Action Guaranteed" to zero for "at rest". All values in between indicate such trends."

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was bound to happen at some time.

 

Alledged leaked documents have started to surface on the internet around this whole practice. (edit), documents on Wikileaks.

 

(edit)[/url]

 

Davenport Lyons and DigiProtect Actionpoints for filesharers, 14 Jan 2009 - Wikileaks

Edited by freakyleaky
Unauthorised commercial link removed.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a suprise really, other companies use a points system (Marlin for one) to assess the likelyhood of success in taking legal action.

 

Probably a bit of a blunt tool but mabey better than going eeni meeni.....

 

Downfall of all scoring systems is that it's only as good as the info given.

 

In DL & ACS cases if you deny it flat and tell them to burger orf they don't have a lot to go on. A flat denial will only indicate that you are no pushover and would probably defend. OK the points system might well say forget it but would only tell them what they already know ie, if someone defends, the action will fail.

 

Not exactly rocket science.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

at this rate the whole of the uk will be in court,

 

yep see you in prison soon.. baggsey i get the top bunk if were sharing cells lol :D

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how many of these 30000 new claims will be 'new people'. I wouldn't be surprised if many of them will be a further claim to people who have maybe already paid up or have given no response to the first claim.....?????Maybe we should prepare ourselves for a second or more claim. As far as the ISP's are concerned I think a mass switch should happen to kick these people in the teeth, as it seems they put up no fight for their customers in Court, nor do they have the decency to write to ALL their customers who's details have been handed over. The ISP's have the money and lawyers to fight these ridiculous claims, they should be our first target I say - switch to a different ISP as soon as possible, that's my answer to BT.:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too received a letter being accused of copyright infringement and like you all was freaked by it. At first i disregarded it as i thought it was a [problem]. When i got a 'part 36' I have since went to my local mp who has been absolutely fantastic. He has written to acs law and the law society for england alerting them to this unjust action. If you are in a trade union they sometimes allow you to have a free 1/2 hour advice from a solicitor. I since then, i have heard nothing from them so everday i keep my fingers crossed that i do not hear from them again. Try not to panic, but do advise that you are pro-active in preserving your innocence. I also wrote to the WHICH magazing and they too have asked me to take part in a campaign to highlight this attrocity that people are being subjected to. Good luck to you all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is it scooter again or a game or porn?

 

 

i suppose any one , random selection , as long as he can generate some revenue

out of that he dont care. Even if he can scare 10 % (of people threatened) it bring millions for him and his fellow crooks

Edited by pridewat
Link to post
Share on other sites

30,000 Internet Users to Receive File-Sharing Cash Demands Derren Brown Blog

 

Not heard from my 3rd LOD.... - a joke really.....

 

Terran

 

no did i after 2nd lod ( and its quite some time). i wonder what happend to so called forensic evidance?

 

i agree its nothing to do with copyright protection of their client but

more to do with making easy money by frightening many innocent people. its

sort of black mail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some lovely quotes in the BBC article..

 

A lawyer who has defended people who have received similar letters described it as a "scattergun approach" which would catch "innocent people".

 

ACS:Law said it was "unaware" of anyone that had been wrongly sent a letter.

 

Really? Are you not reading your mail?

 

ACS: Law are "currently under investigation" by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), but a spokesperson said it could not divulge any more details about the nature of the complaints. The Law Society has also received complaints.

 

Mr Crossley said his firm had been targeted by an "internet campaign" and was cooperating with the inquiries.

 

"It doesn't of itself indicate that I have done anything wrong," he said. "I have no qualms or concerns about what I am doing."

 

 

In addition, technology exists that can hide or "spoof" an IP address.

 

Mr Crossley said that "spoofing" did not apply for file sharing purposes.

 

Ahem, does he know something no one else does?

 

Although Mr Crossley admitted the software had never been analysed in court, he denied it had never been scrutinised.

 

By who?

 

The report was compiled by "an independent expert" and confirmed that the "data being collected is accurate".

 

"That is the starting point for us," said Mr Crossley. "It is very important for us to be accurate. If it is not, everything that comes from that data must be flawed."

 

And finally he admits why he does not want a single case to ever make it as far as a courtroom.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

that should fund them for a few years to come! Could the government mess it up any more? Make mr crossley a lord thats what i say :p

 

The law is so stupid forget killers or worse and go for copyright infringer/alledged they are the **** of the universe once there all broke or banged up the world will be wonderful :)

Edited by halfords
Link to post
Share on other sites

that should fund them for a few years to come! Could the government mess it up any more? Make mr crossley a lord thats what i say :p
Probably need a new photo copier....

 

Took some time to write to my MP tonight especialy when relating to madlesons new proposals as legal scams ( or is that too strong a term ? ) like this will pop up all over soon and proposals such as his ( and imho on the whole correct bar the disconnect thing ) will be getting a massive public back lash.... no doubt starting with the jan 15k....

 

Hope this link is OK by admin - WriteToThem - Email or fax your Councillor, MP, MEP, MSP or Welsh, NI, London Assembly Member for free

 

Terran

ACS:Law Dont Accept Photos But I Unfortuntly Admit To Owning The CD :|
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi can i ask for a list of all ISP who have rolled over and given our IDs out to this ACS-law so i can avoid to re-new my contract with all spineless ISP. Tiscali/Talk-Talk, BT, Virgin, are the few i have on my list of avoidables, can any m8s add to this please? and i would also like to invite all CAGs to add to my campaign im sick of reading about us having to fight our own little corner, if one ISP took action against ACS this would come to a end as quick as it started BUT they havent, if they lose 30.000 customers they have lost lots of £££££££££. The only ISP what i havent hurd of rolling over is AOL is this true? THANKS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

AOL is carphone warehouse.

 

When i win the lottery the 1st thing i will do is chase ACS Law and hit them hard. who the hell can fight them with a solicitors letter starting at £250!!

 

I thought carphone warehouse was gonna fight the NPO's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4982 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...