pridewat
-
Posts
48 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by pridewat
-
i send my 2nd lod almost a year ago and have never heard from them since.
-
yes, Rob dont worry. just send a simple letter of denial without giving any more informations than they already have . Be strong and firm. thats what i did last year and they are off my back for quite few months now.
-
i wonder if its being spread by one of crossley's gang member. I am sure few in this forum are indirectly working for his intrests
-
yes i agree with Andydd answer to you that not to panic, stay calm and just send another lod refer to section 16(1) and 20 of CDPA 1988. and deny . ANSWER AS SHORT AS POSSIBLE. No anger and no ping pong match.
-
I very much hope you dont get it but if you do, then dont ignore it. If you have not done it then answer with simple denial. Dont show anger inyour letter of denial. The less you say the better.
-
no did i after 2nd lod ( and its quite some time). i wonder what happend to so called forensic evidance? i agree its nothing to do with copyright protection of their client but more to do with making easy money by frightening many innocent people. its sort of black mail.
-
i suppose any one , random selection , as long as he can generate some revenue out of that he dont care. Even if he can scare 10 % (of people threatened) it bring millions for him and his fellow crooks
-
according to another forum total 30000 breakdown 25000 of BT and 5000 of kingston communications. i suppose in next round target will be the customers of these companies.
-
if i were you i wont becuse it could give them the impression that you are easy victim. dont worry too much, if you have not done what they allege why worry. I know its difficult but keep urself calm and cool and in time it will go away
-
i appreciate mr toms suggestion, but i would concentrate more on my defense. rather than suing ACS . in meantime if i had any more communication i woul d just send them another lod. i know its frustrating for most of us who have not done what is alleged but its waiting game. we know all of his letters are template too and so are the letters of ICO AND SRA and us lot sending template letter is in no way illegal. only think is he does not like the anwser he is getting because as most of us know his game is generating revenue out of threats and bullying a lot of innocent people.so i will not add anything other than simple denial will not engage myself in silly argument like template issue less you say at this stage the better. i will save everything else if and when he goes to court to present his so called forensic evidance
-
the most effective things that can help our cause is if significant number of MPs take intrest and the mainstream media .
-
i had a reply with same wordings from them back in july except above three lines. i think their investigation will take indefinate time. As i said before and say again most of these regulatory authorities are no more than toothless tigers in my opinion.
-
yes you right , but i wonder why ? that could be part of ACS's game
-
In my personel opinion complaining to SRA . your MP and reporting to consumers groups and Media could be most effective. You can by all means report to ICO but they can not do much if there was a court order to release your personel informatiuons from ISP. But under DPA ACS Law can not pass those informations to a third party other than parties related to his so call claims
-
SRA is investigating DL for so many months and they still have not come out with their report on that.
-
other day i had reply from ICO . there reply is no more than b..l sh.t in my opinion these bodies are no more than toothless tigers
-
welcome welcome mr A C I am sure you will happier here
-
my MP has sent that to secretary of state for culture,Media and sports in JUNE have not heard anything so far
-
i certainly go with the view that if innocent why should i pay a penny ....but the letter and it's terminlogy are surely designs to confuse the lay men . Would it be too much to ask for another letter formatt to be published which i could alter ( as the first LOD ) ...I know it says just repeat the first letter but surely i should address the points they raise in relation to the CPR36.10 ...... Please help ...... you are right an innocent should not pay a penny. Although fisherman06 (on page 41)have made very valid points in his reply to them but i personally think that the minimum you say at this point the better. its better not to tell them what you are doing and these things should be saved to tell in the court (if they are foolish enough to take any innocent to court). i would just deny infringement . 2nd LOD says just enough and if you wish you can alter to suit you. I will just ignore if they say template letter in not acceptable. And please dont worry too much . You are innocent untill proved guilty.
-
yes you are right . off cousre we will get them at the end
-
I have last week from SRA last week.This is a paragraph from their reply: "As you may know from the media coverage of this issue,the SRA is already aware of the concern being raised about ACS Law. R ather than investigate each case individually the SRA is dealing with these concerns by way of a single investigation that encompasses all the reulatory issues raised, which do not vary significantly between cases. The information you have provided will be passed to the releveant team in SRA to be considered within that investigation" "SRA will notify you when the outcome has been reached" Well i think that will take a littele time before i hear from them
