Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PCW Order cancelled after payment


danoli
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5585 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I placed an order for a printer on the 25/1/09. The items was a clearance item in that it was classed as an open box, although still new.

 

The order ws accepted and confirmed, the payment was taken and shipping was scheduled for 26/1/09.

 

Over a week went by and nothing arrived, I checked my online account and it said it was still awaiting shipping.

 

I called customer services, they applogised and said it was still in the warehouse awaiting dispatch, they tried callling the warehouse but it was engaged. They said they would call me back before 5pm that day, no call was received.

 

The next day I called back, I got the same response almost exactly with a promise of a call back, no call again.

 

The next morning 5/1/09, I got an email,

Dear xxxx

Unfortunately your order number 1xxxxxxx placed on the 25/01/2009 cannot be fulfilled due to a system error I have cancelled this order and will arrange a full refund back to your card. I do apologise for any inconvenience that this has caused.

I called and told them the order was accepted and paid for. They claim that their terms and conditions say the contract is only formed on despatch and that the item was no longer available. They also said that the terms and conditions for clearance items allowed them the cancel the order even after payment (or words to that effect)

 

I have printed their terms and conditions, but was tolds that point 5:

 

5. Please note that we reserve the right to cancel or refuse orders for items shown on our website with an incorrect price or with any other incorrect information. No contract is made with you until we have dispatched your order.

 

Although the customer service person told me on the 4/1/09 that the item was in stock but delayed in the warehouse, I am now told it was never available and that point 5 above covers them as the 'incorrect information' means quantity or availability.

 

The printer is NOT end of line and is still available althoug hPCW have no stock at present.

 

Can they do this or do I own the printer that I have paid for even if I haven't received it yet and therefore can demand a replacement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When they take funds they are obliged to supply you with the goods or cancel the contract. They have cancelled it, as they cannot supply it... You have a refund, I don't see the issue.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

When they take funds they are obliged to supply you with the goods or cancel the contract. They have cancelled it, as they cannot supply it... You have a refund, I don't see the issue.

 

Quite simply, loss of bargain. See here. Case law is Robinson -v- Harman(1848 ).

Link to post
Share on other sites

5. Please note that we reserve the right to cancel or refuse orders for items shown on our website with an incorrect price or with any other incorrect information. No contract is made with you until we have dispatched your order.

 

A lot of companies try to claim this, but I can't see it standing up:

 

* If there is no contract, on what other basis are they helping themselves to payment?

* What constitutes acceptance is defined by case law, not just by what the accepting party claims.

* If they are trying to define acceptance in the contract, the terms of the contract do not apply until it is accepted, so it's a paradoxical claim.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also don't see the issue. Item was sold, mistakes were made, item was out of stock, apologies were given along with a full refund.

 

I mean.. you were missing funds for 3-7 days, which is the worst of your inconveniance, and you didn't miss out on a bargain, as there was none to be had. They didn't have the item to begin with.

 

I can't understand the whole "No contract is made with you until we have dispatched your order". Buisness, but I'm pretty sure thats just to cover specific incidents like yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The issue is they're probably not entitled to do that.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The issue is they're probably not entitled to do that.

 

Common sense would dictate they have the right to do that under the curcumstances. In a international company the size of DSGi it's hardly inconcevable that an item of stock could go missing or a stock file could be one or two units out. We get it all them time in my branch due to anything from written off stock to shoplifting.

 

So, they can either magic up some stock, which with a clearance line is impossible because clearance usualy dictates that the manufactorer is no longer supplying them. Or they can issue a refund, and you can choose something else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they provide another item at the same discount, that's fine, but they can't just unilaterally increase the price.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they provide another item at the same discount, that's fine, but they can't just unilaterally increase the price.

 

Where did the OP say anything about a price increase?

 

He bought a clearance item at a reduced price, the item was out of stock and due to a stock error they didn't notice until after payment was taken, so they apologised and refunded his card.

 

You can't seriously expect them to knock money off a current line item simply because a clearance item was out of stock?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really dont see where the issue is here? As it was said before, mistakes were made. These were honest mistakes on the part of DSGi and they have given a full refund!

 

It seems like your just looking for an excuse to have a moan about DSGi!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...