Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Default Notice Petition


inewton08
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5785 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

 

Please read, sign and pass on to others to sign my petition on the following link: http://www.gopetition.com/online/19136.html

 

I have today begun a petition to call on the Government for legislation re: Term of Default Notices.

 

This is not only because there is no legislation at present which states how long a default should remain on a credit file, but to clarify several points.

 

I.E. If you have a Default worth 20 pounds compared with that of somebody with a Default worth 200 pounds, you are punished for the same period of time without any legislation stating how long you SHOULD be punished.

 

If you committed a criminal offense such as council tax evasion, you would be punished less (or i hope) than a murderer would - in these cases you are assessed on a case by case basis yet the world surrounding Default Notices remains vague.

 

If there is no law stating it should be there for 6 years, then why is it? If there is no law stating you can't remove it prior to the expiration of 6 years then why not remove it?

 

It is not an attempt to aid people avoid their responsibilities, it is to justify the actions taken by lenders and to possible force a more understanding and considerate approach to people who have defaulted less than others.

 

If you would be so kind as to sign my petition on the following link, it would be greatly appreciated.

 

Law Reform: Term of Default Notice*-*Online Petition

 

Many thanks for your attention, and if you have any queries or additions you might want to make to the petition, let me know and we can discuss it.

 

Ivan :-)

Edited by jonni2bad
Link removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Signed.

Thanks

- Hobbie

 

--------------------------------------------------------

Under no circumstances should you speak with a Debt Collections Agency via telephone, request that all future correspondence is done in writing, a letter template for this can be located here.

 

Any views expressed are solely that of my own, any advice or information offered is provided in genuine good faith, and should be checked prior to acting upon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Signed

If my posts have helped you please use the scales at the top of my posts :)

 

Any opinions from Jannercobbler are strictly my own and I have no affiliation with any group or services.

 

The two most beautiful words in the English Language are "Cheque Enclosed" - Dorothy Parker

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/399-abbey-letter-sent.html

 

Me v Abbey - £3000 + Int + Costs + Credit File Cleaned.

 

LBA Sent 12/3/06

Court Claim started - 31/5/2006

Allocation Questionnaire Filed - 24/7/06

Court Date allocated 31/10/2006

 

Me v Citi-Cards - CCA Sent 27/07/06

Me v Citi-Cards - Data Protection Act Sent 03/08/06

Me v Capital One - Data Protection Act Sent 03/08/06

Me v Hillesden Securities - CCA Sent 03/08/06

Me v Hillesden Securities - DPA Sent 03/08/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Signed.

I would like to add that one-sided authority of the financial institutions / lenders to register a default on anyone's credit history should also be waived. If a default has been caused by a borrower, it should be mandatory upon all financial institutions to inform the borrower that they are about to register a default on his credit history and he has one last chance to rectify the situation. If the borrower still does not respond and take remedial measures, then the lender could register a default. But a unilateral authority to register default on any one;s credit history should be waived.

Link to post
Share on other sites

INEWTON08,

 

I think we are in danger of splitting our fcorces here. We have a thread running ...

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

 

On that we are trying to challenge all unfair practices, for instance defaults with out CCA agreements, time of default notices, no real right of a fair appeal etc.

 

we are asking everyone to sign a petition there and send a mass complaint letter to the OFT. I don't know if you agree but we may end up splitting between these two petitions and weakening both.

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...