Jane Austen
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
542 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by Jane Austen
-
Read the FAQs and step by step guide
-
Reply today from Richrard Waddington stating he is sorry to hear my concerns are not fully resolved. He anticipates it will take up to 4 weeks to investigate so this will take him way after the 14 days I gave them. Getting ready to file!
-
Just sent off the following E-mail to my new trainee solicitor who says them not filing the AQ was an oversight: Thank you for your E-mail. I find it difficult to believe that there has been another 'oversight' by your firm which I believe has an international network and therefore a correspondingly high profile. There have now been two such 'oversights' regarding my claim and I do not believe the same excuse can be used for both incidents. I am aware that Abbey has instructed your firm to 'defend' many similar cases and in every one of these cases, up to now, they have settled before a full hearing. Therefore, as far as I am concerned this is another time wasting tactic either by your firm or by Abbey. I would welcome the opportunity to take this to court where Abbey can provide me with full disclosure as to how their charges are calculated and the judge can then decide whether they are indeed proportionate. I trust you will infom your client both of my views on disclosure and my request for their default to be removed from all 3 main Credit Reference Agencies. Regards NN
-
Normal procedure for Abbey.
-
I WON !!! msneddon vs Abbey
Jane Austen replied to msneddon's topic in Santander/Abbey and Cahoot successes
IMHO you can't sign this - you would not be able to go for the rest. They are trying to frighten you off. You need to hold your nerve. Good luck -
Apparently he's the one dealing with most of Abbey's cases (but not mine). My trainee seems to have disappeared but I just wondered if we had the same as they missed AQ deadlines. It really is a sad state of affairs.
-
Odd, which trainee have you got?
-
Thanks again Robert. I E-mailed the managing partner at the DLA Leeds office today and asked (politely) what was going on as they had now missed 2 deadlines (The original acknowledgement and then the AQ). I got the following reply which may have useful contact information for some of you: Thank you for your e-mail of today addressed to Neil McLean who is the Managing Partner of this office. I have forwarded your e-mail to Rebecca Beecroft (direct line : 0113 369 2205) who is now dealing with this matter. Yours sincerely Julie Lang PA to Neil McLean Office Managing Partner DLA Piper UK LLP Tel : +44 (0)113 369 2801 Fax: +44 (0)113 369 2896 Wasn't it nice of them to tell me I had a different person dealing with it. Has anybody else got Rebecca Beecroft?
-
Robert Unfortunately the account is still open because they refused to close it on the grounds that I still owe them money. Any money overdrawn is made up purely with bank charges which I have obviously asked to be returned. There was no way I could allow any more money to be paid into the account so they have been adding interest and charges at a rate of knots since I opened my parachute account in May. Is there anything I can do? Most people have settled befor egetting anywhere near a position like this. Do I have to fight them in court over this too?
-
Excellent news. Well done
-
I know. It's like a never ending story. In the meantime I came home to the following letter: 7 September 2006 Re Notice pursuant to s10 of the Data Protection Act Dear Mr & Mrs XXXXXX I write further to the above notice that you have served. When you opened your bank account, you were advised that details about the conduct of your account would be passed to credit reference agencies as part of the operation of your bank account. The processing is therefore necessary for the performance of a contract to which you are a party and, in the circumstances, slO of the Data Protection Act does not apply to this processing. I confirm therefore thatAbbey will not comply with your request. Yours sincerely, David Humphreys Data Protection Consultant Data Protection Compliance Team I have phoned his direct dial number (01908 344104 for anyone who might need it) but it's on voicemail. Any ideas what he's on about? Anybody?
-
*Update* No AQ from Abbey's solicitors even though I E-mailed them twice this afternoon to remind them. The case now goes back before the judge so it will probably mean they get another 10 days to submit the AQ. One of the clerks I spoke to at the court said the judge could throw their defence out tomorrow! HERE'S HOPING!
-
Liverpool Lass V Abbey - ***WON***
Jane Austen replied to liverpool lass's topic in Santander/Abbey and Cahoot successes
Very well done you!! Another successful attack against shabby scabby Abbey!! :lol: -
Thanks for the advice. Mine is for £7000+ so I'm going to have to be careful too.
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.