Jump to content

northmonk

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    167
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by northmonk

  1. This was the first time I've ever gotten a claim form, the only previous one back in 2020 was lost in the post I simply never received it. I should've put a reminder in my phone calendar on this one to remind me of that defence date, 19 days later or whatever, I'd completely forgotten about that date tbh. I still have an ongoing one on here in London, E3 - let's hope I have more success with that one! Regards
  2. Ok noted about the screenshot uploads. In terms of screwing up I had one previous ticket that defaulted and ended up in a CCJ from Southend airport because for some reason during COVID I didn't receive their claim form just a notice of default. This hospital ticket was the 2nd ticket that went to CCJ due to a lack of knowledge of the process. Maybe it's easier just to pay them in future I'm thinking though, I don't get them very often anyway
  3. Yeah I figured, unlikely I'll need credit anyway mortgage all paid off etc so I'll take that on the chin and learn from the experience. Probably would've beaten that too had I remembered the protocol, first time ever going through the process though sob it wasn't familiar to me Oh well
  4. oh no just logged in and it says a judgment was issued literally 2 hours ago! Claim History Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 02/04/2024 at 10:36:44 Your acknowledgment of service was received on 02/04/2024 at 14: 05: 15 A judgment was issued against you on 29/04/2024 at 19:07:08
  5. Ok I've done my defence and printed it out ready to post first thing tomorrow to the court, see attached pdf for my generic defence copied from sticky obviously with my reg not left in on the defence form. This defence is relevant in my case since I was there 90 seconds so couldn't possibly have entered into a contract right? Regards 1. Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of xxxxxx 2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. (
  6. Oh shoot i didn't! I've not been through this process before and had completely forgotten the 19 days rule etc from the forum sticky, what happens now then?
  7. Yes I only contacted you on this hospital charge at the claim form stage, I'd discarded the NTK months ago thinking they'd dropped it. In future I'll hold onto any NTK for much longer, although a year is a fair while, until it's obvious it's been dropped
  8. Right that's exactly why so many drivers got caught, it had been that way for many years then suddenly changes with no warning
  9. Right would that be grounds for a dismissal right there then, 90 seconds?! Lookingforinfo - you're getting crossed wires buddy, we're in the hospital thread here, the ICO complaint was my other appeal the Locton estate one Regards
  10. I'll dig through their documentation see if I can find it, if needs be could I request a copy from the PPC since they seem to want to take it to court? Actually looking at the original post of mine in this thread it appears that I didn't retain any of their original NTK docs etc as I thought they'd dropped the charge since I hadn't heard anything on this in over a year.
  11. I obtained the original from my company who is the hirer and then whatever came through from the SAR recently, but I've got all documentation and I'll put it in order and post it all up including my letters etc
  12. No they must've redacted the contract, that was like that when I received it. Yes correct I was there for 90 seconds! Yes I uploaded the whole contents of their response to my CPR31.14, which included the original PCN
  13. No the ICO complaint was definitely this one, I hadn't had any correspondence from the St Thomas's hospital one in almost a year and then out of the blue a claim form hit the doormat that was it on that one! I sent an SAR on this one back in December to which they completely ignored it and just sent another threatening letter in March asking for payment hence the ICO complaint
  14. Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
  15. Thanks FTMDave, I like the cut of your jib - I'll go with that and obtain proof of postage. Encouraging that NPE have never followed through and seem to blowing hot air, let's see where they go after this Regards
  16. The paploc is from the PPC not their solicitors, see attached I search the site for national parking enforcement snotty letter? Regards 2024-04-03 NPE PAPLOC.pdf
  17. Interesting. Ok so everything they sent in response to my CPR request was part of that attached PDF, there were no other documents. I'll re-upload the original PCN from their response pack and leave dates and times in this time.
×
×
  • Create New...