Schindler
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
33 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by Schindler
-
A must read
Schindler replied to ploddertom's topic in Bailiffs and Enforcement Industry - General discussions
Completely unreasonable but warrant might still be live. Good point though. Good point by Coughdrop too about vulnerability, financial hardship and the national standards. -
A must read
Schindler replied to ploddertom's topic in Bailiffs and Enforcement Industry - General discussions
Well said. Keep on topic and forget other sites. -
A must read
Schindler replied to ploddertom's topic in Bailiffs and Enforcement Industry - General discussions
Agreed Coughdrop. Pompous posts by know it alls are pointless. Much better to have real experience to understand these things. Leave Dodgeball to his ramblings and Bailiff Advice to her huge number of enquiries. -
A must read
Schindler replied to ploddertom's topic in Bailiffs and Enforcement Industry - General discussions
Some good signs, some not. This forum lets you grind your axe, but as you said no real contribution. -
A must read
Schindler replied to ploddertom's topic in Bailiffs and Enforcement Industry - General discussions
Good post Coughdrop -
It was appropriate as Shailesh Vara was reported to have said it was in the TCEA by Bailiff Advice. Couldn't have been more appropriate really. Your link goes to a different Act, I assume that's just a mistake so await the correction with link to the right Act
-
Your link isn't legislation just the final notes before enactment. Unfortunate for you but true. The legislation's imprecise. Intent and what's written are different. Convenient when all that's been asked is where the TCE states what Shailesh Vara said. I'll stop now as you can't answer my question
- 44 replies
-
- bailiff
- county court
-
(and 10 more)
Tagged with:
-
Shailesh Vara stated something incorrect. The TCE doesn't state what they claim, an appalling and amateur error.
- 44 replies
-
- bailiff
- county court
-
(and 10 more)
Tagged with:
-
No, I asked where in the TCE it says £75 can be retained. I didn't ask for an explanation. I haven't had an answer to the question.
- 44 replies
-
- bailiff
- county court
-
(and 10 more)
Tagged with:
-
I thought explanatory memoranda were just put to parliament as a bill goes through so isn't legislation really. I don't think you're going to answer the question. Thanks for trying though.
- 44 replies
-
- bailiff
- county court
-
(and 10 more)
Tagged with:
-
Above is a response to a consultation and section 50 TCE about judicial appointments, so where is bit about the £75 as I can't see it
- 44 replies
-
- bailiff
- county court
-
(and 10 more)
Tagged with:
-
Trying to find where TCE says £75 can be retained as Bailiff Advice said
- 44 replies
-
- bailiff
- county court
-
(and 10 more)
Tagged with:
-
They can't. Bailiff Advice and others don't understand people can be in that position or if they do what should people do?
- 63 replies
-
I still can't see where in TCE this is said can you give a link please?
- 44 replies
-
- bailiff
- county court
-
(and 10 more)
Tagged with:
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.