sgtbush
-
Posts
1,815 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by sgtbush
-
Mobil version is needed, takes an age to load. not all of us have andriod or ios, I use a windows phone. The page jumps around to load adverts in. I dont need to try another browser, I've tried E. Firefox and chrome which are all installed on my phone. Same outcome. the colours are awful and clash.
-
completely confusing. where is mobile version? latest posts? latest posts I've replied in? colours merge and mingle and are not attractive to the eye menu options are confusing the type bar keeps jumping to put bloody advertising in. that's all I've found in the 1st min
-
People are judging you because you have an appalling attitude. If I were an employer id hope that the interview process would pick up on your insecurities, of which you have many and lack of people skills, as you have shown here with your rant. You need to engage a social filter
-
So people that work in fast food industry are dogs?? And working in a supermarket is great?? Reality check required.
-
If I were an employer id rather employ someone who wants to work and better themselves even if its their 1st job @26 than some other 26 year old who has had multiple jobs only lasting months.
-
Annual Leave - USE it or LOSE it!
sgtbush replied to w4ter_Boy's topic in Employment and minimum wage problems
Then use it. Holiday pay is part of her pay and she is entitled to it, either in time off or money. If she earnt £15/hour and the employer said I'm taking £1.00/hour back you'd hit the roof. -
When was your MS90 Failure to give information as to identity of driver. This carries 6points and stays on your licence for 4 years from date of conviction. Penalties for uninsured drivers: The police could give you a fixed penalty of £300 and 6 penalty points if you’re caught driving a vehicle you’re not insured to drive. If the case goes to court you could get: •an unlimited fine •disqualified from driving The police also have the power to seize, and in some cases, destroy the vehicle that’s being driven uninsured.
-
Neighbour Ignores Party Wall Request
sgtbush replied to WoodDD's topic in The building trade and installers
Id double check your legal cover on household insurance. Its not for you issuing proceedings against someone. Its used when someone issues proceedings against you. If it was the first way you wouldn't have no win no fee solicitors as we would all be going thru our household insurance. -
Neighbour Ignores Party Wall Request
sgtbush replied to WoodDD's topic in The building trade and installers
Well that would mean that 99% of extensions/builds/permitted builds without planning permission would need a party wall agreement.... And they don't. I put an extension up around 5 years ago, I needed PP but no party wall agreements with either side. Their will be someone that will be able to explain why, in legislation, I didn't. I went on the advice of the surveyor, architect and local council planning dept. Like I said , if you think your right, hire a solicitor and a surveyor and take legal action. Ps if you look on the .gov website it says below foundation levels or near the party wall. I did enquire on the definition of "near" as I was 750mm on my side to party wall. PP dept said you dont need one -
Neighbour Ignores Party Wall Request
sgtbush replied to WoodDD's topic in The building trade and installers
Then go hire a solicitor if you think your right. A junior solicitor will cost around £100/hour. A more senior one around £200/hour. From what you have said and from.me reading the rules on .gov website on party walls I cant see why you need a party wall agreement, unless your leaving bits of info out. -
Neighbour Ignores Party Wall Request
sgtbush replied to WoodDD's topic in The building trade and installers
Who advised you. You can view plans to see foundation depth. If your property has "no" foundations then the other party cannot dig below them. They prob took advice too and found that the extension does not require a party wall agreement. Solution... Make sure your bank account has tens of thousands in it as arguments of this nature will cost you lots in solicitors fees. Not so much for the defendant if they have legal cover on household insurance. -
Just because the invoice says zero charge does not mean the item has zero value. You have had previously dealings with the company so they are classed as goods sent in error, not unsolicited goods It may be a replacement for someone else and by human error sent to.you. Send it back, at their expense. Stop looking for a freebie.
-
Neighbour Ignores Party Wall Request
sgtbush replied to WoodDD's topic in The building trade and installers
Why do you believe that they are going to dig deeper than your foundations? You can view the plans. Also they are 90cm on there property and not building ON the party line. You must tell your neighbour if you want to: •build on or at the boundary of your 2 properties •work on an existing party wall or party structure •dig below and near to the foundation level of their property -
No the other residents wont be chased, the OP stated in 1st post that they knew that their name was on the water bill
-
Problem with Enterprise rent a car, legal advice needed
sgtbush replied to ref600's topic in General Motoring Issues
Dx the more important issue are the possibly unlawful fixed sum penalty charges, which are in most cases unlawful.. This is actually in the hire contract that the OP signed. Any charges can be charged to the credit card and an admin fee ontop. So its a bit more in depth than a speculative invoice for private parking. I'm surprised they allows you to leave a debit card number and not credit card... As seen as you stated (OP) that you have instructed a solicitor to take the case in not going to comment any further to why they come to get the car.. I would of done the same. -
I did find this on a google search tho. If you have already paid the beneficiaries their entitlements from the estate and you receive a letter from the DWP about a potential claim you should contact the beneficiaries to explain that there could be money due to the DWP which will need to be repaid. You should ask the beneficiaries to return the money they have received to you to hold pending the outcome of the DWP’s enquiries. You must ensure that you act quickly. As executor you could ultimately be personally liable for the sum due. If you are in any doubt you should seek specialist legal advice.
-
A sar wouldn't reveal much HB, the DWP are asking for 10 years of bank statements to decide.. They have nothing, zip nada zilch so they are asking for statements. My response to that would be apply to the courts for a court order. Again where that lies in law I'm not sure but they seem to be fishing for evidence
-
Well I would write back saying that unfortunately you [DWP] had ample opportunity to present yourselves as a creditor when you were informed of the death. You have not done so in a timely manner and the estate has already been distributed by probate. Where this lies within The law, well I'm not sure but it seems to me that they have had ample time but failed to act.
-
Reasonable Adjustments - Occupational Health
sgtbush replied to pukpuk's topic in Employment and minimum wage problems
I've been resisting to comment on this thread, but its gone so far off topic its of no use to the OP. The employer only has to do what is reasonable, and that's I they are a good, people orientated employer. They could trump everything by saying "business needs" and dismiss under capability issues. I'll take Thi to the nth degree and play devils advocate here. A window cleaner is employed by a company. The employee has an accident at work and is now unable to walk and uses a wheelchair. The employers liability insurance pays compensation and covers costs etc. Is it reasonable now that the employer is forced to carry on employing them with adjustments like a crane of some description? I'm pointing out the difficulties on defining reasonable. -
Yes. That's correct. It would be like buying a car with a smashed front end, buying insurance and then claim on the new insurance. Its pre existing damage, its not the concern of the insurance company.
-
I can see the road markings clearly in the pics. Accept the fine as advised above
-
Is this the site? The bit where the carriageway is divided? (though it isn't a true 'dual carriageway') https://www.google.com/maps/@54.8903...7i13312!8i6656 If so, they have even put up speed camera warnings and a reminder it is 30 mph..... there is a sign in that google street view pic with a 30mph sign AND a sign for enforcement cameras and a bit gurther on the markings in the road seem clear.
-
You need to upload the pictures you've been sent, with your reg blacked out
-
And where was it. Use google maps as all speed cameras are documented.
-
What type of camera got you? Gatso? Average speed check? Forward facing infa red?
