Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×
Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

fossn

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    40

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by fossn

  1. fossn
    My insurance company has been doing this for years.
  2. fossn
    Hi I have received notification from police on last day of six month prosecution limit saying I am to answer for speeding. Thing is its not a summons its headed Postal Requisition. It isn't dated, it has no magistrates details other than a name which the MoJ say doesn't exist. It lists a hearing date at a different magistrates court address. Any advice or explanation welcome.
  3. fossn
    Hi I have received a summons from a magistrates court that doesn't exist. It is not on MoJ list and email enquiry confirmed it does not exist. Does this mean the summons cannot be enforced? Any advice I can read anywhere on how magistrate courts come into being or where they get authority to exist/issue summons would be appreciated. Magistrates actually hold court in another courts building. Thanks.
  4. fossn
    The TPT is NOT a court. It is a privately funded strong arm enforcer for local authorities. I have a JR being considered by a high court judge right now. I don't need your patronising, support the system abuse attitude so will not be debating the matter any further.
  5. fossn
    Make the most of it because unlike your car there is nothing to stop the baliffs taking your PC to pay your debt. There's my locked front door!! You must be one of those who ask how high when someone says jump. I will never stop fighting the imposition of morally and legally wrong practices which have no basis in law. The TEC was set up as part of the system of civil parking enforcement. Neither it or the TPT have any legal basis for existing outside of that legislation. TPT adjudicators have no legal standing and cannot make any truely enforceable legal decisions. They hide behind the fact they are not employed within a real legal setting and keep all their recordings of hearings them selves, refuse to honour the FOI system and need to be taken to a real court and overturned. The TEC is a collection service for local authorities and again has no real legal basis. Everyone has the right to a hearing in their own local court but the TEC write a load of illegal conditions on their warrants giving the impression that there is nothing you can do. There is. FIGHT
  6. fossn
    Well said Marincor. I join sites like this to fight the system . I find it strange how many people give advice which is to roll over, pay up or otherwise give the state exactly what it wants. I will never roll over, I spend all my time looking for loopholes and fighting the unfair, corrupt, biased system which is designed to keep the minions in their place and the rich, elitist minority in the lap of luxury at everyone elses expense.
  7. fossn
    The TEC have been created using dodgy legislation and a system totally stacked in favour of their system. They should be unable to register debts and send in bailiffs without checking the validity of the information they are using to persecute and intimidate people. If they did not receive any money they would be unable to exist, every organisation needs funding. Any other view would be extremely naive. Do you work for them or something?
  8. fossn
    Hi Marincor I received a PCN. I appealed. it was rejected. I took it to the TPT. The councils expert witness said I was right to suppose I could legally park where I was. The adjudicator said if the law was ambiguous then she must find in my favour. However she then backtracked and adjourned for the council to submit further evidence. The second hearing found in the councils favour. I know the bailiff law but what they do in practice and what the law says they should do are completely different. disabled people have had their motability cars illegally clamped by bailiffs and been forced to pay or go to court to get their vehicles back. Also they can't force entry but they do intimidate vulnerable people. See the CAG forum for cases. I have received information regarding the TEC. They seem to be interpreting the law very favourably to their advantage but are not being challenged through the courts unfortunately.
  9. fossn
    Politicians appear to be intensively trained to mislead the public with their crocodile tears and false sympathy for the plight of victims of thier incompetence and failure to address the majority concerns. They only represent big business and very rich individuals who can afford lobbyists and contributions to party funds. The rest of us are an inconvenience to their masterplan. Responding to calls like this for interaction and debate, are, IMO utterly futile without root and branch reform of our political system.
  10. fossn
    The TPT was last year. I applied for a review but it was refused. I had time to apply for a judicial review but the TPT avenue was exhausted. I didn't get the barrister until legal aid was granted for the crown court appeal against the magistrates conviction of the police tickets. I could still have taken the TPT to a judicial review but wouldn't have had legal aid to do so.
  11. fossn
    Thanks for the help guys. I offered £5 a week which is genuinely all I can afford with everything else I have to pay. Actually zero is left after I pay everything but thats not an option. I don't drink or smoke or go pubbing or clubbing. I have asked my MP to asist and he has contacted some head honcho at the council to intervene. Lets hope that works.
  12. fossn
    hi Thanks for the email address. Thats the one I have been using to correspond with parking services. They replied by letter stating they will let the warrant take its course because it would take too long to pay them at the rate I was offering and ignoring all my info on my means and situation. My vehicle is a motability car.
  13. fossn
    It is North Lincs council. What does being a vulnerable person mean?
  14. fossn
    Definition of a Vulnerable Adult A Vulnerable Adult is a person aged 18 or over, "who is or may be in need of community care services by reason of mental or other disability, age or illness and who is, or maybe unable to take care of him or herself or unable to protect him or herself against significant harm or exploitation " " Law Commission Report, 1997 " Just thought this might be helpful in defining vulnerability. Copied it from Harrow council adult services webpage. Bailiffs are a remnant of a bygone age and should be abolished. Everyone has income, whether from the state or not and the IT systems of today should be able to deduct payments at source from that income. This would be much more efficient IMO, although I don't agree with the system of fining people who live on benefit which the law says is the minimum necessary to live on but thats another issue I guess.
  15. fossn
    Dear Green and mean Thank you for a completely irrelevant opinion.
  16. fossn
    Sorry forgot to ask. If the TEC is a court and issues warrants then I can file a N245 notice against them?
  17. fossn
    I fought the ticket at the TPT and lost. I was going to appeal for a judicila review in the high court but was advised by a barrister that although I was legally correct something called purposive law acted to allow the council to issue parking tickets for the offence. I had told the council I was issuing an application for the JR which then didn't happen so they issued the enforcement as they already had the paperwork ready without negotiating a payment plan with me. Can anyone give me the legislation which covers the creation and responsibilities of the TEC please.
  18. fossn
    Hi I have been issued an Order For Recovery Of Unpaid Penalty Charge by the TEC on behalf of my local authority. The notice states a Bailiff Warrant Application will be made in 28 days unless I pay the full amount. I made an offer to pay but my local authority refused on the grounds it would take too long to pay off and ignored my ability to pay( I am disabled and on benefit). I have found info on the net which says the TEC is not a court and has no legal authority to issue warrants. http://www.trafficenforcementcentre.org.uk/index.html However they do not fight the issue of the warrants but take action after the event. I want to stop the local authority now. I have also read through the DOT Guide to Local Authorties Parking Policy and Enforcement. I have also been told if I start paying at the rate I offered the council cannot refuse but would this stop them getting the bailiff warrant? Thanks for reading.
  19. fossn
    I think, Huggy, you are generalising in a big way. people visit for a variety of reasons and some of them want to get out of unenforcable agreements, thats why so many people signed up when companies started offering the service. I asked for advice, not self opinionated comments. I am not returning to this thread so don't bother wasting your time with a reply, although I'm sure you will as you probably have to have the last word as well. Cheers. Bye
  20. fossn
    The online application is just that. They sent a hard copy for me to sign. The agreement is only enforceable IF the courts order it so. If they had such an iron clad case they wouldn't be selling it all around the debt collection industry, the first ones they sent it to would have enforced it .
  21. fossn
    Hi Does anyone offer proper advice or just their own self opninionated comments?
  22. fossn
    Sorry, should have made clear it is a fine from the magistrates court. I had to make a means declaration so the court is absolutely aware of my situation. As I understand it they are the only circumstances where entry can be forced.
  23. fossn
    Hi Can anyone clarify the right to bailiffs to force entry when the person is a vulnerable person. I read the info elsewhere on the site but don't understand how it works fr a vulnerable person. The court knows I am vulnerable because I gave them the info when I was sentenced and asked how I would pay. If the bailiff forced entry when I was out how would they know I am vulnerable? Would the court make a note of it on the warrant if they know already? Can they just force entry even if someone is classified as vulnerable? Thanks.
  24. fossn
    Hi I have a similar problem for an unpaid fine. I have been reading the vulnerable persons part. If I tell the court I am a vulnerable person the bailiff has to go back to the magistrates for further instructions. What does this mean. I told the judge in court that I was in receipt of DLA and registered disabled etc. If the bailiff forces entry in my absence s/he won't know I am a vulnerable person or will the court know before they issue a warrant? If they continue to issue the warrant does that mean they are aware and have already considered it? is there a place on the warrant to register that the person is vulnerable and the bailiff can go ahead?
  25. fossn
    hi I have 2 debts with a mail order company. I have requested copies of the agreements under CCA. none have been provided thus far. The thing is I keep getting debt collectors trying to collect. 4 so far. I'm getting sick and tired of explaining yet again that I have requested a copy of the agreement. Every time I do this the debt collection agency goes away BUT a few months later a new debt collector is trying again. Who do I report it to? Should I take out an injunction against the mail order company?

Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...