Jump to content

afee12345

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    47
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by afee12345

  1. any help in writing a template to judge before the case hearing?
  2. accept MF have no right to audiance however can MF forward questions to LIP reasonably undermines the case to put across to witness?
  3. i meant questioning the witness,(what questions to put forward) is that possible?
  4. offence is for careless driving, problem is accused cannot speak English and never been to a court, i would help him with a written statement to present the court and help him with any cross examinations.
  5. friend of mine is in court for trial,first time in court and wrongly accused of a motoring offence. has no idea of court procedures and unable to afford a lawyer to represent him. i would like to help him through the process and guide him what to say , when and any questions to raise with witness.
  6. Is a McKenzie friend allowed to assist for a motoring summary offence in a magistrate court? I need to write a letter to court to be allowed a McKenzie friend and need help in writing one, any template please?
  7. I’m looking to purchase a used vehicle past manufacture warranty in the near future; some dealers offer various types of aftermarket warranties. Reading about feedback purchasers experienced from these warranties, it seems they are not worth the paper it’s written on. It seems most claim handlers seem to wriggle out with the term “wear and tear”. My question is, are these regulated and referred to an independent adjudicator if things do go wrong if purchased one? Thanks
  8. need some info as to proceed further.. had my appeal considered by the local force and its been partially upheld on certain aspects,. there's no further appeal process. I want to claim my losses and have the appeal reconsidered as I still believe its not been fully investigated. will the next route be small claims?
  9. umm, in that case if payment are made to clear the outstanding balance or alleged default, then vm have to remove the default mark?as the account is no longer in default. Still marking the account as late payments. Any thoughts?
  10. If there's no cca regulated and no default notice applicable, am I correct then vm are incorrect to mark CRA as default as it's incorrect?if so then ICO need to intervene if vm refuse to remove as not within cca act and information incorrectly reporting?
  11. Been digging further in this vm reporting, spoken to a consumer advisor and they give a conflicting explanation, a default notice needs to be served for it to be defaulted and further action taken. Default notice can be issued if a cca is in place in the first place. ICO saying data can be reported as you have consented according to t&c,but once account closed, no longer consent valid. now from the post , if it's a service agreement, then a default notice if any or default marked will be incorrect? or if account is closed, service terminated than there's no service agreement in place?and if VM have marked a default on account , then if outstanding monies are paid , the account is no longer in default? Any feedback in this as thinking to proceed further to OFT or ICO..
  12. if there's no cca 1974 agreement, can they still report to CRA's and mark a default on my report? my account was closed down in may, they carried on reporting late payments and then marking default. i just want it removed from my name as its affecting my credit by lenders' had a very good record and this has just knocked me back, no fault of mine.
  13. Hi, I recently applied for a c/c and was turned down(very surprised). I decided to check my credit file to see everything in order, uprising realized adefault by Virgin Media in my file for £40. I was a customer with vm and terminated my package(giving 30day notice ) with them in may to move on to sky (better deal )and was out of my contract. Services terminated on 10/5/13 and thought account was cleared all up to date. In my credit file they have been marking late payments d,3,2,1,0,0,0,0 etc. Under effective dates it says start date .xx/xx/xx default .08/13 end.20/8/13 Now my services ended on the 10/5 and in the report it says20/8??.(any one knows what that means) I haven’t received any final bills from them, and readingabout defaults, never received a default notice as required. I have written to them enclosing a £1 po, requesting a CCAas i did not even know this was under the xxxx1974 act.... Any members here can shed some light on this and can theystrike a default mark? What them dates above mean? if there is true an amount outstanding I would want to pay off and have this default removed, any advice thxs
  14. ADMIN thanks for editing the thread title, in my scenario its not even crushed, it was sold/scrapped for a packet of crisps. £5k car under £100
  15. vehicle removed by constabulary under s99, recovery agents sent a standard notice to dispose with no dates marked on letter , letter arrives by recorded post and signed. now interesting bit was I had to respond back within 7 days to arrange collection or contact ,responded back on 7th day of receipt of letter. received letter back saying 'vehicle disposed on xx/xx/xx (which is 3 days after receipt of letter) as no contact was made within the 7 day period as in letter. made contact back and this constabulary period starts the day the letter is generated ( in black and white). now what they were not expecting was I kept the envelope with sorting office markings (time and date),track numbers,track proof delivered. now I have forwarded all this forward to them and are still trying to fob me off, so just waiting in black and white to arrive. I am now compiling a file so I can take the matter forward(courts)as there is a major flawed in the system for vehicles recovered .(in other words its impossible getting the vehicle back) If any one has any experience in this, send us a private message btw this is so behind curtains because the innocent motorist does not realize what's happening as 99.9% ,its the vehicle owners insurance that pay out not understanding what has happened. IMO it will be the motorist in these categorizer that may get affected: vehicle stolen and found by constabulary abandoned vehicle broken-down and removed by constabulary when recovered under s99 and motorist has no interest in claiming vehicle
  16. Hope I posted in the right area as it relate to a motoring issue,if not admin plz place in right area. I need someone to shed some light on a matter had motoring issue a nd vehicle was recovered by the police recovery contractors. My question is when a letter to respond within a 7 days is posted, does the 7 day period begin from the date of the letter posted or when served (i.ewhen received by signed post and proof is available) In my situation, letter was sent and received 7 days later. (i could not respond as the period had already ended before getting the letter by signed post) If someone can shed some info on this and the relevant law. Thanks in advance
  17. The area is approx 70 mtr in length with only 2 signs erected, first about 10 meter from start of bay down and second 40 mtr down from start of bay, leaving the last 20 mtr bay with no signs. It seems i will have to go for the discounted fine if paid within 14 days
  18. Hi Have searched but have an unclear understanding of the signs in parking restriction areas. If a designated parking area is marked with a rectangle box, parallel to the pavement: Môn-sat 9.30 -4pm 30 min parking no return 30 min My question is, what are requirements for the local authority to place signs in that area? The marked area in question can fit approx 20 cars. Currently there is a sign at the beginning of the bay and another ¾ down the marked area. I parked my vehicle at the end of the bay and just exceeded the 30 min parking time and was issued with a pcn. I wanted to challenge this pcn on the grounds that a sign was not erected at the end of the marked area and was not aware of the restriction (which is truly the fact).the nearest sign to the end of the bay is 21 mtr away I have read in posts that signs need to be erected at each end of the box area (or where the line turns in to the pavement (L shape).can someone shed some light on this and any links to the legislation. Thanks in advance
  19. hi i have a freind who has a running business.the business has been running since 2008. the business was setup with a bank business loan to purchase the property so it is secured against that.the business made a small profit first year and a little loss in second year,probably a loss in third year due to current economic conditions the question is if the business loan payments are kept uptodate untill the business is gone in profit,can the bank ask for its money back as it is currently in a loss and a risk. the loan was setup on a repayment period for 10years and my freind is making repayment payments to decrease the business loan.he has reduced the loan by 1/7.he also has secured his personal property as a garantee.so the bank have a big equity. please advice as he is worried he may loose all his hard work. thanks
  20. a big thanks to dj for your help is this the refund i should be expecting +the upfront ppi minus from my total loan?
  21. finnally had an update from FOS. FOS have upheld my complain and lloyd boys will pay out. i kindley ask if any of the members can help me work out the exact figures as what i should be reimbursed,as reading from posts lloyds have a habbit of shortfall. i took out a loan with lloyds in may 2006 for : 12778.13 + 3801.39 ppi = 16579.52 m/payments= 341.9 + 101.73 ppi = 443.69 apr 19.9% t/payable = 20517.60 + 6103.80 ppi = 26621.40 60mts first payment in aug 06 followed by 9 more. then loan was restructured in may 07 13198.35 + 3170.30 ppi = 16368.65 m/payments= 351.14 + 84.35 = 435.49 apr 15.1% t/payable = 17557.00 + 4217.50 = 21774.50 50mts made first payment in june 07 total made 39 payments to date and 2 holiday payments thanks in advance
  22. last sentence should had read good news for the banks bad news for the consumers. does anyone know what the new rules are imposed by the FSA
  23. are you refering to this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/moneybox/9074699.stm that is good news for the consumers
  24. i only left my mobile number which was lost in the crash.
×
×
  • Create New...