Sorry ken if you have already put these up,the ones i picked are all easy to work with ,i think.What about the ;without hinderance ; bit at the bottom of these ,Sch 2/2...... c and e look good

We are working to the new extra hours, not signed the new contract yet.about 6 weeks have gone by and we arenot getting any answers. The new company said they would sort out extra money for the extra hours [ about 3 a week ] but have nat come back to us yet.By working the extra hours can they insist we nave excepted the new contract.Also the area we covered has grown to a 2 hours or more as opposed to 1 hour.Not heard about holiday money owed to me either.many thanks

any of the above seem like a good reason for unfair terms

) making an agreement binding on the consumer whereas provision of services by the seller or supplier is subject to a condition whose realisation depends on his own will alone; (d) permitting the seller or supplier to retain sums paid by the consumer where the latter decides not to conclude or perform the contract, without providing for the consumer to receive compensation of an equivalent amount from the seller or supplier where the latter is the party cancelling the contract; e) requiring any consumer who fails to fulfil his obligation to pay a disproportionately high sum in compensation; (f) authorising the seller or supplier to dissolve the contract on a discretionary basis where the same facility is not granted to the consumer, or permitting the seller or supplier to retain the sums paid for services not yet supplied by him where it is the seller or supplier himself who dissolves the contract; k) enabling the seller or supplier to alter unilaterally without a valid reason any characteristics of the product or service to be provided; o) obliging the consumer to fulfil all his obligations where the seller or supplier does not perform his; m) giving the seller or supplier the right to determine whether the goods or services supplied are in conformity with the contract, or giving him the exclusive right to interpret any term of the contract;

Please look at the above and let me know what you think ,many thanks

Thanks,its a new company who won the contract from A.The new contract has big changes such as more hours for same salary but they are working to try and give us some money to cover the extra hours,personaly i prefere same hours for same money,many thanks

Thanks Beau,it turns out that A never informed B about the unpaid hol money,we have now been with B 4 weeks and i am due o/t money from A.I have not signed Bs contract yet .Howlong can i work without commiting my self to either contract,many thanks.

A is still running ok ,just lost this contract to B .I believe that they should have paid hol money ,they say they donot ,company B said they are still liable for the money as they are still solvent? I have looked throgh the tupe rules and cannot find anything otherthan entitlements to the no of holidays many thanks.

sorry answered wrong thread but sim problems

If you tupe from company A to company B and you are owed holiday from A does A pay the holiday money to you when you change/leave A to tupe over to B ,many thanks for any replies

Of course they cannot ,its take it or leave,go to the next bank and it will be the same

No negotiation in terms when you sign,are you fully aware of them though,i suppose you should be.If you are aware of the terms and sign could they say you could have negotiated at that time

Allowing the payment to go out of the account knowing a charge would be levied could be unfair,maybe?

Never got another meeting ,after all the worry they caused and now he has moved to the new company .So thanks for every ones help ,it gave us confidence which was conveyed across to upper management.Many thanks to all

Why not say no you cannot have the money,what reasons do they have for allowing unauthorized payments.Is it all auto to a certain point,what or who decides it stops.This all might sound silly but just looking at another angle.

do they decide no, its auto paid then they charge you ,

They decide to make the payment that they then charge you for

Unfair Term,=Reg5 UTCCR maybe. Also section 4 of the Fraud act ,i think i might add .

Any charge that cannot be justified is unfair to the consumer and if this action puts the consumer at a dissadvantage and the only course of action is to take it to court then it can only be termed as an Unfair Term ..I have to reply to banks letter saying their charges are fine, does the above make sense many thanks

Its so nice to hear good news , well done

Should they have all the docs they mention in the POC WHEN they start legal action, if so should this be stated and they should be put to strict proof.Although we know they cannot in this case.all the best

Thanks all but the meeting was cancelled do to bad weather. Time is short now as we change in jan to new company so i donot realy know what they will do.We are at work upto and after christmas so they still have time to arrange a meeting which i believe should take place to try and resolve this before we move over.Idid phone the next higher manager twice, left a message but no reply.I am a co-worker and i will advise about the grevance point.Many thanks

The meet is tomo so not enough time to put in a greiv but i will speak to my friend early tomo,any more help much appriciated and thanks to all of you for help recieved so far

It would not be good to go over with a grievance as he is starting anew not tupe.How about the result of the meeting,