Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/09/23 in all areas

  1. If you don’t know what they actually did or didn’t say : you might get duff advice if it is based on incorrect info. Best they post here so we only get the one (accurate) version. They absolutely don’t have to mention other journeys if not asked about them. But that doesn’t mean TfL won’t have an idea there were more journeys. Hence why it’s a bad idea to say “it was a one off, spur of the moment thing” when it’ll be obvious to TfL that it wasn’t! I think I phrased it as “You / your friend don’t have to tell them it has been for 2 months if they haven’t asked. That doesn’t mean it would be good to get caught in an obvious
    1 point
  2. Supplementary ws indeed! I think Hedgehog has put in more than enough effort already. Why put him/her to the trouble and effort of writing yet another WS? This could go on ad infinitum... The fleecers had their chance to make their case and obviously now think they've blown it! I say ask for their latest missive to be thrown out...
    1 point
  3. 1 point
  4. Hi Dixon, I suggest you respond to HMCTS immediately :- 1. Updating them about your ongoing medical issues. 2. Confirm any dates that you know of when you'll be unavailable for a court hearing. 3. Apologise for not submitting the Witness Statement within the latest 14 day deadline and confirm your intention to reply to them as necessary within 14 days from now. Confirm you only just found their email sent to you 3 weeks back.
    1 point
  5. Thanks FTM Dave. Really appreciate your feedback and I will contact RBH Properties. I certainly know now not to admit I was the driver, but basically I'm an honest person who made a genuine mistake. I will let you know the outcome of my request to RBH Properties.
    1 point
  6. We certainly don't recommend appealing, but that's not an absolute, an appeal done now & again for tactical reasons can be a good idea. So I agree with you. On top of that, NCP are serial non-respecters of the 14-day POFA time scale. In the cases I mentioned upthread they didn't respect the 14 days. But we have a big, big problem. The person in legal dispute has thrown the paperwork away. They can hardly appeal, saying NCP didn't respect POFA, if they haven't a clue whether NCP respected POFA or not! Hopefully they will learn from this huge mistake, as we all do.
    1 point
  7. Hi, it's a shame you didn't ask for help in preparing and that there wasn't a legal advisor available at court. Unfortunately the only way to challenge the judge's decision is if they made an error in a point of law in their judgement which it doesn't sound as if they did. If you managed to get a job and could prove the job offer, start date and salary you might have a chance to go back to court and show you can pay going forward - it's not guaranteed and it sounds like your lender is pretty set on possession of the property. Did you ask for time to sell ?
    1 point
  8. Yes that's right. Let us know when you get a mediation date. Do your reading – but don't forget you are entitled to every penny that you are claiming. EVRi are simply wasting time and they are wasting taxpayers money and simply trying to make you regret that you had never started your claim – and making sure that you are held up as an example to others who are less confident then you.
    1 point
  9. Hi Keith, just wanted to put in my twopence... Not sure whether you missed it, but the "individual" who wrote the email isn't just a poor lowly worker with no skin in the game... The signature was: Partner & Director Relations Case Manager (note the red highlight.) Clearly this individual does have some level of control and influence in the matter and probably isn't as constrained by internal processes as you believe.
    1 point
  10. That all sounds very decent and noble – but the people are paid by John Lewis to carry the message and to promote the attitude which you are having to deal with and which is causing you all of these problems, using up scarce public resources in the County Court and also taken up our time as a volunteer advice group. If these people's names are known they will then think a little bit more about what they are doing and maybe they will speak their line managers and maybe somebody will feel sufficiently uncomfortable to reflect on the way they are treating you and other customers. I'm afraid that protecting these frontline staff in this wa
    1 point
  11. Yes it needs to stay up just in case the company is phoenixed.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...